hova- wrote:Red Auerbach ....
Nah honestly .. why puttin up all those threads "whos better" etc. ? It would be better to at least name it "name your favourite coach and why?" ... the forum is a bit spammed with topics right now ...
BIG GREEN wrote:So you're supporting phil or aren't? You're saying rings mean nothing but phil is HOF material? I'm confused.hova- wrote:Red Auerbach ....
Nah honestly .. why puttin up all those threads "whos better" etc. ? It would be better to at least name it "name your favourite coach and why?" ... the forum is a bit spammed with topics right now ...
Sorry moderator "hova" we'll change our discussions on the forum to suit you now.
LakersRule24 wrote:Phil is a great basketball psychologist, great at managing egos, and motivating players. But he is a terrible in game coach/strategist and simply cannot coach defense or offense. He is a basketball psychologist, nothing more. Most people will say Phil is the greatest coach of all time because he has 9 rings. He won those rings simply because he had arguably 3 of the top 10 greatest players of all time with him on all those championship teams.
shadowgrin wrote:Quick question: who is better in basketball, a black dude or a pinoy dude. If you thought or considered for a moment that it's the black dude then you're also a little bit racist.
End of any racist discussion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests