My reply to some of Matthew's points would be as followed:
I just can't understand how a place can dissovle so quickly... I think back to the old forums (and no this isnt a "well back in my day point") and even though there was spam, there was flaming, it was fair. There wasn't the inconsistancies that we see today. It's almost like its become upside down, whats left is right, up is down, coolmac is smart, dweaver is cool, sit is a winner. These are opposites that should never be confused with each other.
I feel I've been as fair as I can possibly be thus far in my term as a moderator. While nobody's perfect, I certainly make every effort to be fair, and have tried even moreso since its been called into question.
For starters, the new moderating team has to be re-evaluated in my opinion. The only guy I would keep is Indy, and thats becuase he seems to not be serving his own ego when he does his job. The new guys, cyanide, bighort, ty land, you say its inexperience or whatever, and if thats the case, then are you admitting that you really shouldn't be in a leadership role here at nlsc? Everyone knows it takes time to adjust to a new position, hell it took the Greatest Mod of all time (Jae) a few weeks before he understood what it took and he took it to a new level.
I respectfully disagree. I think the new moderators are all classy, respectible members of the forum who, a few months from now if not sooner, people will warm up to. I also feel that because there's so many new moderators, people have been 'testing the waters' so to speak, to see exactly what they can and cannot get away with. With yourself and Jae, they knew already, but that was due to time served. Again, with time, I imagine a similar thing will happen as people become more familiar with our methods of moderation. I am in no way saying that any member of the moderation team should not be in a leadership position at NLSC, though that question was likely rhetorical.
But what made Jae great? It was his passion (or lack of life ) to enforce the rules whilst using common sense. He became a leader and shaped these forums into somthing special becuase he never put himself or his ego infront of a decision he made, it was always the community first. I see a little bit of that in Indy, but at the same time Indy is still his own man. I'm not saying Indy is good becuase he is a little like Jae in that regard, I'm saying he's the best of the bunch so far becuase he actually interprets the rules with common sense.
I haven't noticed any of the new moderators placing their ego in front of their decisions regarding moderation of the forums. Maybe it's happened and I've just missed it - I don't know. It just seems like a rather large assumption to think that of four separate people who all happen to share the same position. You have to realize that none of us are Jae, and I won't speak on behalf of the other moderators; but I'm not trying to be. I'm just being me, doing what I feel is right, and talking to the other moderators & Andrew about things I'm unsure of. Beyond that, I'm interpreting the rules in the clearest possible way I can. Since the daily pot shots started, I've actually taken a few looks over them again to make sure I'm enforcing the way I feel they are intended to be, and I've yet to change my opinions. If that makes me wrong, so be it.
If you care about the site, you will take shit for it. It's just the nature of it. And just remember, if you don't like it, nobody is forcing you to stay. It's hard, there are expectations on you, and at times you will be unpopular. But that's what you volunteered for, not to roam around the forums with a title and the ability to move posts.
I couldn't agree more. In fact, in the short while I've been a moderator, I've experienced degrees of everything mentioned already, and while it was a bit of a change at first from not being a moderator, I'm now at peace with it all, and am really starting to enjoy doing what I feel is right for the forums, regardless of whether it's the popular thing to do or not.
This is what the problem was with Tales. Thats what the problem was with Nigel (cha ching ). As Jackal has said, respect is to be earnt, not expected.
If I earn respect, I earn it. If not, I don't. I feel if I do what I feel is for the best of the forum and remain consistant in my actions, anything beyond that is out of my hands. Maybe some people will respect me for it, maybe others won't. My main focus as a moderator is to the forums as a whole -- I think respect just comes with the territory of doing the right thing, as well as longevity -- something many of us don't have as a notch in our belt at this point. Maybe I'm wrong, but I can never see myself doing anything with the primary intention of gaining respect; I feel that that's something that comes later as a result of proper and just moderating.
I think I've spoken enough. If you have something to say, feel free to disagree or throw an idea or two into how to improve things.
Thank you for starting this topic. It's been much more productive than reading daily cheap shots by others, and I feel that there will be some changes made; be they small or large. If anything, at least we'll have explored the topic and given people a forum to let themselves be heard on.
It's time everyone stepped up.
