Fenix wrote:Meh. I get the 'subtle' point, but overally, it's just a crappy movie. Overrated.
Don wrote:I wouldn't call it brilliant. It's better than most "horror" movies coming out these days though.
nzspurs wrote:I watched "Nightmare on Elm Street" the other day. It is interesting to see how far the horror-genre has come, that movie in particular wasn't that scary at all to me but i'm sure it would have seriously freaked people out when first released.
Indy wrote:Unfortunately I have to give a somewhat negative review to Saw 3. By itself I think its a pretty decent modern horror film, but when compared to the other 2 it just doesn't measure up. The end sort of leaves you feeling like eh, yeah it makes sense, yeah its good, yeah good twist, but at the same time you feel a little disappointed and left out. It doesn't make you go "Oh man, if he had just waited 30 more minutes!" "Oh man, Imagine how bad it would suck to be in that position, ahhhhh!" like the other two.
Also they keep doing all these weird transtitional shots for like the first 45 minutes of the movie where it looks like their panning in the same room, but the pan ends somewhere completely different. It is clever the first 4 or 5 times they do it, but then it starts to get annoying.
I give it a 7.2/10.
it was announced that Nicolas Cage would play Superman in a fifth Warner Bros. Superman film, Tim Burton would direct, and Anthony Hopkins would appear as Jor-El, with Michael Keaton to appear as Batman. Several posters of a silver 'S' shield against a black background, stating "Coming 1998", were made before the project was eventually called off. Cage left the project after growing tired of the delayed production and Hopkins followed when it was clear it was going nowhere.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests