koberulz wrote:What was the score at the time?
Andrew wrote:I don't think it was a bad decision, it was his shot to take.
ixcuincle wrote:
benji wrote:LeBron is such a choker. And people were talking about him as an all-time great. As having possibly surpassed Kobe. What a joke.
velvet bliss wrote:Andrew, you the real MVP.
Andrew wrote:He who flops and flails to the Finals and a title, flops and flails best.
hova- wrote:Am I the only one who's seeing this guy averaging over six turnovers per game over the last six games? And also, does he even have a left hand?
No hating though, he's really overachieving, but he has to work hard to get better to become a really good player that does not have just a good span of games.
"What I see from Jeremy and what I hear in his interviews is he appreciates everything. He pursues his dream. His attitude is so peaceful, but there is strength to him. It is not a violent strength like fire or something aggressive. It is like the ocean, very peaceful, very quiet when you look at it. But you can never underestimate the power that is in there."
niharjhatn wrote:He was shooting 17% from 3's this season I believe before that game, and the score was tied...
I wouldn't want anyone apart from a real premiere 3 point shooter taking that shot. Unless it was Reggie Miller or Ray Allen.
hova- wrote:Am I the only one who's seeing this guy averaging over six turnovers per game over the last six games?
durvasa wrote:For those who are criticizing Lin on his recent turnover binge:
In 5 of his last 6 games, Lin has amassed 34 turnovers.
In those 5 games, the Knicks as a team have 84 turnovers. The opposing team has 86 turnovers.
Lin has played 192 minutes in those 5 games, so the rest of the Knicks have played 1008 total minutes and had only 50 turnovers in those 5 games. If you average it out, that comes to a turnover every 20.2 minutes for the rest of the players. So, if they all maintained their same turnover rates during this span and played without Jeremy Lin, they'd average only 11.9 turnovers as a team per 48 minutes.
For the NBA as a whole, if you remove PGs from the equation, there were 10005 turnovers committed in 172080 total minutes. That comes to 1 turnover every 17.2 minutes. Or, 14 turnovers as a team per 48 minutes (assuming same turnover rates, no PGs).
The point is just to illustrate that with Lin handling the ball a ton, his turnovers will be higher but also his teammate's turnovers will go down. What matters is overall team turnovers.
kevC wrote:Stolen from Clutchfans -durvasa wrote:For those who are criticizing Lin on his recent turnover binge:
In 5 of his last 6 games, Lin has amassed 34 turnovers.
In those 5 games, the Knicks as a team have 84 turnovers. The opposing team has 86 turnovers.
Lin has played 192 minutes in those 5 games, so the rest of the Knicks have played 1008 total minutes and had only 50 turnovers in those 5 games. If you average it out, that comes to a turnover every 20.2 minutes for the rest of the players. So, if they all maintained their same turnover rates during this span and played without Jeremy Lin, they'd average only 11.9 turnovers as a team per 48 minutes.
For the NBA as a whole, if you remove PGs from the equation, there were 10005 turnovers committed in 172080 total minutes. That comes to 1 turnover every 17.2 minutes. Or, 14 turnovers as a team per 48 minutes (assuming same turnover rates, no PGs).
The point is just to illustrate that with Lin handling the ball a ton, his turnovers will be higher but also his teammate's turnovers will go down. What matters is overall team turnovers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests