NovU wrote:So placing Dirk above Karl Malone is legit to you then?
NovU wrote:Dirk's stats are just as awesome. And he also has the Finals MVP trophy, beetch.
shadowgrin wrote:If the Mavs didn't win it all, none of you would be even placing him in your top 5.
Andrew wrote:shadowgrin wrote:If the Mavs didn't win it all, none of you would be even placing him in your top 5.
Possibly, but looking back at his career numbers he had a decent shot of making the top five even before this year. The 2011 Finals certainly does raise awareness of him and his career accomplishments, though.
shadowgrin wrote:KG may not have the stats that Dirk has but KG is a better all-around player and played both ends of the floor very well.
benji wrote:rayallen20 wrote:What if you let them play a real game? 5 on 5?
The former team (Walker-Rose-Pedja-Anderson-Fisher) would vaporize the latter team off the face of the earth. They have gobs of rings, the latter team has one ring combined. Anyone who doesn't have a ring is worthless especially compared to those who won rings.
Real basketball fans know this, anyone with a ring is better than anyone without one automatically.
Learn about the game already, maybe you could try watching it to start.
Qballer wrote:i think barkley does have a case to be higher on a lot of peoples' lists. i mean they created that 5 second back down rule because of people like him
He was also a one-time All-Star and the inspiration for the unofficially named "Mark Jackson rule," which dictates that players can't back down their defender for more than five seconds on the perimeter.
He was also a one-time All-Star and the inspiration for the unofficially named "Mark Jackson rule," which dictates that players can't back down their defender for more than five seconds on the perimeter.
benji wrote:rayallen20 wrote:What if you let them play a real game? 5 on 5?
The former team (Walker-Rose-Pedja-Anderson-Fisher) would vaporize the latter team off the face of the earth. They have gobs of rings, the latter team has one ring combined. Anyone who doesn't have a ring is worthless especially compared to those who won rings.
Real basketball fans know this, anyone with a ring is better than anyone without one automatically.
Learn about the game already, maybe you could try watching it to start.
NovU wrote:YEAH!
That's why Robert Horry tops basketball noobs like Tim Duncan or Charles Barkley in my unofficial list. What noobs. Can u beat 6?
benji wrote:rayallen20 wrote:What if you let them play a real game? 5 on 5?
The former team (Walker-Rose-Pedja-Anderson-Fisher) would vaporize the latter team off the face of the earth. They have gobs of rings, the latter team has one ring combined. Anyone who doesn't have a ring is worthless especially compared to those who won rings.
Real basketball fans know this, anyone with a ring is better than anyone without one automatically.
Learn about the game already, maybe you could try watching it to start.
x-uNdErRaTeD-z wrote:@SteveHTOWN
Ever heard of a guy named Michael Jordan?
He pretty much crushed Chuck's chances at winning a championship.
NovU wrote:YEAH!
That's why Robert Horry tops basketball noobs like Tim Duncan or Charles Barkley in my unofficial list. What noobs. Can u beat 6?
Andrew wrote:The Rockets really only had a decent shot at the title in 1997, where Stockton ruined the party in the Western Conference Finals. After that, age and injuries took too much of a toll on their big three.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests