Oznogrd wrote:The 1st one was so bad i never finished the 1st mission. this doesnt surprise me at all.
Which of the horrific hate crime console ports did you play?
el badman wrote:Only a 7.0 for IGN. I'm surprised, I thought it was gonna get a great review, but it's apparently marred by a mediocre pacing, repetitive action, and a false sense of roaming freedom (unlike GTA IV I guess). Still, should be fun to play, I guess I just won't buy the limited edition though, just the regular one on PC.
There's a ton of reviews and stuff out there bashing it for not being "open-world with tons of crap to do" because none of them played the first game and just assumed this was GTA IN MAFIA DAYS! That's the problem with console-only idiots. If they had played the first one it was the said shit console ports (which they probably didn't play as those reviewers have either moved onto real jobs or the games were thrown onto the low-pay reviewers who have to review all the crap) and plus they love average crap in the first place. (See: MW/MW2.)
That PC review for example is just a copy/paste of the 360 one, by the same guy. The original game was reviewed back when there was a separate PC review team and it got a 9.2. They gave the Xbox/PS2 ports a 6.8 back in the day. GameSpot is the same, the review now is just a copy/paste of the 360. They loved the original when they had a PC team. The fact either of them scored the console ports of the first game a 7 is even worse. Shit wasn't even playable. Although those reviewers seem to have understood it's not GTA, it's a story based linear game instead of a sandbox.
Not saying the game can't be worse than the first, or even terrible, just that IGN/GameSpot/etc. reviews are usually worthless as hell. They love blockbuster crap that they've been hyping themselves over for months, and anything else they just spit a 7-9 on depending on how much it fits into what they wanted the game to be like. It's only when you have something expected to be crap that turns out awesome like Batman that you can escape this obvious review system. But since they wanted Mafia II to be GTA IV but in the mob days, and it's not because it was never going to be, they could never give it a 9 unless they were trying to shift copies at GameStop, it has to be an 8 at best.
Any review for a game that's not marked with red on MetaCritic isn't worth the time to read.