shadowgrin wrote:Explain why.
z02 wrote:Let's quit the facepalms and talk about Overtime Lengths!
axelgomez13 wrote:OK, in that case benji, I think the current OT format is perfect because 5 minutes isn't too long or too short to decide a winner of a tie game. There, now I will ask nicely, can you stop with the questions? Please
axelgomez13 wrote:I must have been on crack
Sauru wrote:fisher showed why going for the steal is not always in the best interest. he ended up busting nash in the face again. worse yet he did it with no realistic chance to win at that point
z02 wrote:Sauru wrote:i think the new overtime rules should be another 4, 12 minute quarters. that should fairly determine the winner
one extra 12 minute quarter is good enough. You and eleven friends should play a 96-minute game and see how you like it. Then come back to this forum and tell us how you like it.
Andrew wrote:I thought it looked dirty when it happened but not so much when it was replayed from a couple of different angles.
Sauru wrote:z02 wrote:Sauru wrote:i think the new overtime rules should be another 4, 12 minute quarters. that should fairly determine the winner
one extra 12 minute quarter is good enough. You and eleven friends should play a 96-minute game and see how you like it. Then come back to this forum and tell us how you like it.
yeah it was sarcastic. then again, i usually play for 4-6 hours when i play so i am sure i could handle 96 minutes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests