No, this isn't about a certain politician saying the American economy is fundamentally strong, but with events that have transpired so far this week:
- The Lehman Brothers files for bankruptcy
- Merrill Lynch gets acquired by Bank of America
- AIG is saved by the federal government with a $85 billion loan.
These are big firms, so it's interesting to see Wall Street going into panic mode, but how much of it is just sensationalist or is it actually legitimately concerning? How does this affect Americans in the short term and in the long term? How does this affect everyone else globally?
Edit: A small overview
The American Economy
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The American Economy
by cyanide on Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:23 am
Last edited by cyanide on Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
-
cyanide - Dat steatopygous
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
- Location: US's toque
Re: The American Economy
by benji on Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:33 am
Didn't we already have a thread on this?
Sadly, this is one instance where Johm McCain is right. The government couldn't purchase companies if the economy was collapsing in on itself. Most of the economy is unaffected by Wall Street's panics and euphorias, energy prices do more damage to that part. (In a recent ad, Obama is attacking Johm McCain saying he's not ready to "run the economy." That's even scarier than businesses failing (which they all do) as apparently the President will again be personally running the economy. Hopefully our Dear Leader won't be picking gold prices based on lucky numbers and trying to figure out how to raise taxes above 100% this time. Of course we're basically there, what with there being no authority for the federal government to take over AIG.)
People confuse the failing of poorly run businesses with the failing of the economy as a whole. That "scary" Dow drop? It was 4-5% of the value. (Of which a third has already been recovered.) The one everyone is rushing to compare to 1987 because the point drop was around the same? 1987 was over a quarter of the DJIA value.
These state "bailouts" (which are really state takeovers) are a horrible precedent. I can't fathom why people who see an endless parade of government caused economic problems (energy prices, Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae, domestic auto industry, public education) want to have the government take over even more of the economy (including one-sixth of the economy with health insurance) to mismanage. And then they want to erect trade barriers to the rest of the world. We tried this before, it was called The Great Depression. And it was caused and made worse by government.
This stuff, this is just a blip. Baby boomers will destroy the economy and the country, not a handful of mismanaged financial corporations. The current economy is about $13-14 trillion. AIG was taken over for $85 billion. Microsoft might be a $260 billion company. Even combined, none of the major corporations are a $73 trillion liability. And none of them have police power to steal from you.
It's really too bad our first black President will be considered a failure because of it.
We might need another "bail out" though.
cyanide wrote:No, this isn't about a certain politician saying the American economy is fundamentally strong
Sadly, this is one instance where Johm McCain is right. The government couldn't purchase companies if the economy was collapsing in on itself. Most of the economy is unaffected by Wall Street's panics and euphorias, energy prices do more damage to that part. (In a recent ad, Obama is attacking Johm McCain saying he's not ready to "run the economy." That's even scarier than businesses failing (which they all do) as apparently the President will again be personally running the economy. Hopefully our Dear Leader won't be picking gold prices based on lucky numbers and trying to figure out how to raise taxes above 100% this time. Of course we're basically there, what with there being no authority for the federal government to take over AIG.)
People confuse the failing of poorly run businesses with the failing of the economy as a whole. That "scary" Dow drop? It was 4-5% of the value. (Of which a third has already been recovered.) The one everyone is rushing to compare to 1987 because the point drop was around the same? 1987 was over a quarter of the DJIA value.
These state "bailouts" (which are really state takeovers) are a horrible precedent. I can't fathom why people who see an endless parade of government caused economic problems (energy prices, Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae, domestic auto industry, public education) want to have the government take over even more of the economy (including one-sixth of the economy with health insurance) to mismanage. And then they want to erect trade barriers to the rest of the world. We tried this before, it was called The Great Depression. And it was caused and made worse by government.
This stuff, this is just a blip. Baby boomers will destroy the economy and the country, not a handful of mismanaged financial corporations. The current economy is about $13-14 trillion. AIG was taken over for $85 billion. Microsoft might be a $260 billion company. Even combined, none of the major corporations are a $73 trillion liability. And none of them have police power to steal from you.
It's really too bad our first black President will be considered a failure because of it.
We might need another "bail out" though.
-
benji - Posts: 14545
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am
Re: The American Economy
by cyanide on Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:02 am
benji wrote:Didn't we already have a thread on this?
Whoops, do we? A merger should be in the works then.
Interesting points. From what I understand so far, the federal government loaned AIG $85 billion, but AIG has to repay it with interest?
I'm wondering, why did the government intervene? From what I've read, if AIG went down, it would affect the global economy and more smaller companies would also go down, causing a chain reaction. Would this situation be better than government intervention? (I'm not saying I agree with government intervention, but I'm wondering what the ramifications would be if the gov't did not intervene).
Finally, when you said that the baby boomers will destroy the economy, are you saying that in 10 years time, America will be in a great depression that they can never get out of?
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
-
cyanide - Dat steatopygous
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
- Location: US's toque
by benji on Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:39 am
That one Hefty made is the same subject basically.
The Fed gave AIG $85 billion to take care of liquidity problems, and in return the Fed now owns 80% of the companies stock.
We're now setting a precedent where, it doesn't matter what the fuck you do, what risks you take or what books you cook, if you're big enough, the government will steal from American citizens to save you if it likes you. (This is where Microsoft failed, they hadn't involved themselves in politics before the government went after them. So there was no interest to protect them. Also, you wouldn't see this currently if an oil company was going under.) And if you're a political money laundering operation like Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae then you don't even have to hope the government bails you out, you know they will.
Moar like five years amirite? And you can always get out of a Depression by freeing the markets up. But we won't. We'll demand more and more government power, and want to stick it more and more to those evil employers and businessmen who are hurting us by providing goods, services and jobs. And when they all start to leave we'll have to start making it illegal to leave the country.
There's a reason Social Security and Medicare are considered the Third and Fourth Rails. No one is daring enough to plainly state to people that they have to take them away. It is political suicide. Congress won't touch it, and President Obama says there isn't even a problem.
This is what happens when you live in a fascist country with no regard for rule of law. Europe is facing the same thing on a smaller scale, we're already seeing it in the States as their pensions fail, and we're ignoring it while demanding and promising even more of it.
EDIT: Update with clearer picture out now.
It looks like the Fed has zero intention of saving AIG as a business. Instead they floated it $85 billion in a two year loan so that the company can liquidate the assets in a more orderly fashion instead of a panic sell-off. During this draw down of the company, the proceeds will be used to pay off the loan. In the meantime the government is most certainly taking over the company to force it to sell itself off.
From what I understand so far, the federal government loaned AIG $85 billion, but AIG has to repay it with interest?
The Fed gave AIG $85 billion to take care of liquidity problems, and in return the Fed now owns 80% of the companies stock.
I'm wondering, why did the government intervene? From what I've read, if AIG went down, it would affect the global economy and more smaller companies would also go down, causing a chain reaction. Would this situation be better than government intervention?
We're now setting a precedent where, it doesn't matter what the fuck you do, what risks you take or what books you cook, if you're big enough, the government will steal from American citizens to save you if it likes you. (This is where Microsoft failed, they hadn't involved themselves in politics before the government went after them. So there was no interest to protect them. Also, you wouldn't see this currently if an oil company was going under.) And if you're a political money laundering operation like Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae then you don't even have to hope the government bails you out, you know they will.
Finally, when you said that the baby boomers will destroy the economy, are you saying that in 10 years time, America will be in a great depression that they can never get out of?
Moar like five years amirite? And you can always get out of a Depression by freeing the markets up. But we won't. We'll demand more and more government power, and want to stick it more and more to those evil employers and businessmen who are hurting us by providing goods, services and jobs. And when they all start to leave we'll have to start making it illegal to leave the country.
There's a reason Social Security and Medicare are considered the Third and Fourth Rails. No one is daring enough to plainly state to people that they have to take them away. It is political suicide. Congress won't touch it, and President Obama says there isn't even a problem.
This is what happens when you live in a fascist country with no regard for rule of law. Europe is facing the same thing on a smaller scale, we're already seeing it in the States as their pensions fail, and we're ignoring it while demanding and promising even more of it.
EDIT: Update with clearer picture out now.
It looks like the Fed has zero intention of saving AIG as a business. Instead they floated it $85 billion in a two year loan so that the company can liquidate the assets in a more orderly fashion instead of a panic sell-off. During this draw down of the company, the proceeds will be used to pay off the loan. In the meantime the government is most certainly taking over the company to force it to sell itself off.
The government will install new management and will have veto power over all important decisions, including asset sales and payment of dividends.
Last edited by benji on Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
benji - Posts: 14545
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am
by diddy on Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:30 pm
part of Russian reserve stocks are in US dollars, but we won't be hurt much! America has printed too much dollars to be covered and supplied with gold! hope this problem could be solved quickly!
only god can judge me
My graphic thread My Recent Blog Entry
My graphic thread My Recent Blog Entry
Ricky Roma from Miami Heat forums wrote:" Celtic fans: We lead the league in age, fat aszes, O'neals, senior citizens, and acting! Don't mess with us, cause we got rondo!! YOU HEAR ME!! RONDO!!!!"
2pac wrote:through every dark night, there's a bright day after that, so no matter how hard it get, stick your chest out, keep your head up, and handle it
-
diddy - Miami Heat starting PG
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: Russia Tver
by cyanide on Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:05 am
benji wrote:Moar like five years amirite? And you can always get out of a Depression by freeing the markets up. But we won't. We'll demand more and more government power, and want to stick it more and more to those evil employers and businessmen who are hurting us by providing goods, services and jobs. And when they all start to leave we'll have to start making it illegal to leave the country.
I'm a little confused with that statement. America takes pride in being a "free" country, but the trend you're describing sounds more and more like a Communist nation!
benji wrote:This is what happens when you live in a fascist country with no regard for rule of law.
When you say "you," are you referring to Canada (me), or the States?
benji wrote:Europe is facing the same thing on a smaller scale, we're already seeing it in the States as their pensions fail, and we're ignoring it while demanding and promising even more of it.
To put it simply, the world's demanding Big Brother?
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
-
cyanide - Dat steatopygous
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
- Location: US's toque
by benji on Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:28 am
I'm a little confused with that statement. America takes pride in being a "free" country, but the trend you're describing sounds more and more like a Communist nation!
And dictators hold elections, it doesn't make them democrats.
When you say "you," are you referring to Canada (me), or the States?
The latter, but I don't see why it couldn't be both.
To put it simply, the world's demanding Big Brother?
Not Big Brother. But Big Mother. (Although I suppose the security cam fetish would be the former.)
Brave New World, not 1984.
Oh, and I said:
That "scary" Dow drop? It was 4-5% of the value. (Of which a third has already been recovered.)
Yeah, the rest of it was recovered today.
-
benji - Posts: 14545
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am
by benji on Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:21 am
Yep, that's exactly what we need, bank runs.
If you have less than $100,000 there is no reason to withdraw your money from banks. If you have much more than that sitting in one bank, you're doing it wrong anyway.
If you have less than $100,000 there is no reason to withdraw your money from banks. If you have much more than that sitting in one bank, you're doing it wrong anyway.
-
benji - Posts: 14545
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am
by el badman on Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:37 am
Correct, this is only concerning for people with actual investments, but not so much for regular banking accounts, that shouldn't have any effect.
Still, all of this current turmoil is definitely not a good sign, and it looks like it'll get worse before it gets better.
Still, all of this current turmoil is definitely not a good sign, and it looks like it'll get worse before it gets better.
El Badmanator VI: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X @3.7GHz, Nvidia GTX 3090 24GB; Acer Predator XB273K 4K 27"Monitor; Samsung NVMe EVO 970 1TB / Samsung EVO Pro 500GS SSD; Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite; T-Force RAM DDR4-4000 32GB RAM; EVGA G5 850W PSU; Corsair iCUE H100i CPU Liquid Cooler; Razer DeathAdder Chroma wireless gaming mouse; HyperX Cloud Flight S wireless headset; Logitech G560 speakers; Razer Black Widow v3 mechanical keyboard; PS5 Dualsense controller; Rosewill Cullinan V500 gaming case; Windows 10 Pro 64bit
el badman's bandcamp
el badman's bandcamp
-
el badman - Last of the Meheecans
- Posts: 4246
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:42 am
- Location: El Paso, TX
by cyanide on Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:49 am
benji wrote:Brave New World, not 1984.
Gotcha.
benji wrote:Yeah, the rest of it was recovered today.
Made me happy. My investment jumped 17% today.
benji wrote:If you have less than $100,000 there is no reason to withdraw your money from banks. If you have much more than that sitting in one bank, you're doing it wrong anyway
Agreed, though I'd love to have $100 000 to start off with.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
-
cyanide - Dat steatopygous
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
- Location: US's toque
by Joe' on Sat Sep 20, 2008 9:02 pm
Woah, Milan's stock exchange went up like 8% today, which hasn't happened in more than ten years. Has the situation gotten any better in the US?
Dear Old World, you represent everything that's wrong...
-
Joe' - Sir Psycho Sexy
- Posts: 2586
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:02 pm
by cyanide on Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:11 am
Joe' wrote:Woah, Milan's stock exchange went up like 8% today, which hasn't happened in more than ten years. Has the situation gotten any better in the US?
Yeah, it made a huge rebound on Thursday, and yesterday wasn't too shabby either. No reason to panic I guess.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
-
cyanide - Dat steatopygous
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
- Location: US's toque
by shadowgrin on Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:22 am
benji wrote:If you have less than $100,000 there is no reason to withdraw your money from banks. If you have much more than that sitting in one bank, you're doing it wrong anyway.
benji's right. You should spread your money to different banks so the insurance can cover the savings you might lose.
- shadowgrin
- Doesn't negotiate with terrorists. NLSC's Jefferson Davis. The Questioneer
- Posts: 23229
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:21 am
- Location: In your mind
by cyanide on Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:56 am
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
-
cyanide - Dat steatopygous
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
- Location: US's toque
by cyanide on Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:55 am
Benji, is Ron Paul our saviour?
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
-
cyanide - Dat steatopygous
- Posts: 9197
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
- Location: US's toque
by benji on Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:49 am
No.
This is actually good. Bailout was bad.
Because it failed, Fed did this. Notice the price tag.
Instead of the government owning a bunch of shit loans, and the Treasury Secretary having insane unconstitutional power, now the banks will have to deal with them but they get some extra Fed cash to help. (Which, was part of the House Republican plan. And now we see the Dem coalition was a farce if they had no cover.)
This is actually good. Bailout was bad.
Because it failed, Fed did this. Notice the price tag.
Instead of the government owning a bunch of shit loans, and the Treasury Secretary having insane unconstitutional power, now the banks will have to deal with them but they get some extra Fed cash to help. (Which, was part of the House Republican plan. And now we see the Dem coalition was a farce if they had no cover.)
-
benji - Posts: 14545
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:09 am
23 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests