answer my question pls...

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

answer my question pls...

Postby mr2ksports on Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:11 pm

hey guys!!
does a 512mb 7600gs performs much better than a 256mb one?
mr2ksports
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:53 am
Location: Manila, Philippines

Postby Platinum on Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:29 pm

yup
there's so much to do today that i have to set apart more time to pray
User avatar
Platinum
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 10:37 pm

Postby Patr1ck on Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:46 pm

Not necessarily. mr2ksports, post your system specs because going with the 512mb one might not be worth it, especially since the 7600 is a midrange card(probably low-end now).
Patr1ck
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 13340
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: Pasadena, California, US

Postby mr2ksports on Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:37 am

specs
P4 3.20E Ghz w/ HT (socket 478)
512 MB RAM Dual Channel set-up (planning to add 1GB more)
512 MB Geforce 7600 gs AGP

i bought this gpu cause this is the best gpu that my money can buy. hope it performs better than a 256 one :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
mr2ksports
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:53 am
Location: Manila, Philippines

Postby Platinum on Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:56 pm

yes. it would perform better. just take my word for it

you should add more RAM though
there's so much to do today that i have to set apart more time to pray
User avatar
Platinum
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 10:37 pm

Postby Fitzy on Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:07 pm

especially if your running vista, one gig or more is a must to run it at full potential
User avatar
Fitzy
 
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Horsham, Victoria, Australia

Postby mr2ksports on Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:15 pm

can you explain why it will perform better? explain briefly :D
mr2ksports
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:53 am
Location: Manila, Philippines

Postby Fitzy on Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:05 am

with vista?

its just a recommendation thats all, i mean you can run it on lower then a gig, but you will find after a while it gets really sluggy and slow, but upgrading to a gig or more will help it to run at full speed
User avatar
Fitzy
 
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Horsham, Victoria, Australia

Postby Andrew on Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:36 am

mr2ksports wrote:can you explain why it will perform better? explain briefly :D


Vista is extremely resource hungry, so the more RAM the better.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115126
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby mr2ksports on Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:02 am

not about vista thing.. i was asking what are the advantages of having more video memory (eg 512 vs 256mb) in games... cause i have read from the other forums that having 512 for 7600gs is useless.. and what does this memory for?(in gaming)

and lastly.. this is out of topic
if i have sata HDD instead IDE/PATA will i experience improvement on gaming? :D :D
mr2ksports
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:53 am
Location: Manila, Philippines

Postby Patr1ck on Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:59 am

Sata HDD's are generally faster, so you should see improvement, even if it's barely noticeable. When I bought my new computer I got a 500 mb SATA HDD with a 32mb cache and that perpendicular technology or whatever it's called. The difference from my 250 gb ATA 133 drive is very noticeable. Although, I am comparing an almost completely empty hard drive to a very full and probably fragmented hard drive on two different computers.

From my past experience, more video ram won't really run a game faster because cards that have more ram usually have a lower clock speed on that ram. The 512 mb on the 7600 might not be worth since it isn't a high-end card, but it could allow you to run a game in a higher resolution then you could normally run with the 256 version without having the framerate drop as much as it would if you had 256 mb.
Patr1ck
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 13340
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 5:54 pm
Location: Pasadena, California, US

Postby el badman on Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:00 am

From my past experience, more video ram won't really run a game faster because cards that have more ram usually have a lower clock speed on that ram. The 512 mb on the 7600 might not be worth since it isn't a high-end card, but it could allow you to run a game in a higher resolution then you could normally run with the 256 version without having the framerate drop as much as it would if you had 256 mb.

I would add that it won't really make anything faster or better looking, since it's not a high-end card as Pdub mentioned, but it may certainly reduce any stuttering and mouse lag you might experience otherwise, since it will buffer more info with 512MB compared to 256.
El Badmanator VI: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X @3.7GHz, Nvidia GTX 3090 24GB; Acer Predator XB273K 4K 27"Monitor; Samsung NVMe EVO 970 1TB / Samsung EVO Pro 500GS SSD; Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite; T-Force RAM DDR4-4000 32GB RAM; EVGA G5 850W PSU; Corsair iCUE H100i CPU Liquid Cooler; Razer DeathAdder Chroma wireless gaming mouse; HyperX Cloud Flight S wireless headset; Logitech G560 speakers; Razer Black Widow v3 mechanical keyboard; PS5 Dualsense controller; Rosewill Cullinan V500 gaming case; Windows 10 Pro 64bit
el badman's bandcamp
User avatar
el badman
Last of the Meheecans
 
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:42 am
Location: El Paso, TX

Postby mr2ksports on Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:10 am

thanks for that

and i just wanna ask why the pc games can't lock frames rates like the console does? and what about v-sync? is it different from locking the frame rate?
mr2ksports
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:53 am
Location: Manila, Philippines

Postby el badman on Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:02 am

Some games offer that possibility if you go tweak their .ini files and such, but trust me, you wouldn't want that on PC. On most recent games, even with the latest hardware, it's not like you would be able to stay at 40 or 50 fps for example. Of course it sucks when your performance sinks in the 10s or under, but if you understand what your PC is capable of and how you should set your in-game settings, you should be able to avoid that anyway and you'll be glad that your fps does fluctuate.
Except if you really have a great performance overall, you probably shouldn't use vsync (especially with this type of card). It will not only cap your fps, but it will just reduce it drastically, even if you use the Triple Buffer to offset its effects.
You might want to take a look at this guide if you have concerns about performance in general: http://www.tweakguides.com/Graphics_1.html
It explains all basic concepts very thoroughly.
El Badmanator VI: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X @3.7GHz, Nvidia GTX 3090 24GB; Acer Predator XB273K 4K 27"Monitor; Samsung NVMe EVO 970 1TB / Samsung EVO Pro 500GS SSD; Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite; T-Force RAM DDR4-4000 32GB RAM; EVGA G5 850W PSU; Corsair iCUE H100i CPU Liquid Cooler; Razer DeathAdder Chroma wireless gaming mouse; HyperX Cloud Flight S wireless headset; Logitech G560 speakers; Razer Black Widow v3 mechanical keyboard; PS5 Dualsense controller; Rosewill Cullinan V500 gaming case; Windows 10 Pro 64bit
el badman's bandcamp
User avatar
el badman
Last of the Meheecans
 
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:42 am
Location: El Paso, TX

Postby mr2ksports on Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:14 pm

thank you for the response..
how about putting a 8400 on windows xp?? is it better than 7900?
mr2ksports
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:53 am
Location: Manila, Philippines


Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests