BZ wrote:Oh and also, this still hasn't been answered yet but how come Aikido isn't prominent in MMA competition? Surely such an effective self defense art like Aikido would be part of some fighter's repetoire.
Eugene wrote:However, it's only effective to those who've mastered the art--since the moves require such timing, fluidity, and precision, it takes longer to learn and much more skill to pull off effectively in a real situation.
Adding to what Eugene posted, MMA fighters often train with multiple disciplines during training e.g. kickboxing, jiu-jitsu, wrestling, boxing. With attention divided amongst different disciplines, the MMA fighter wouldn't be able to completely master the art to its most lethal and effective level compared to what a master of the art has accomplished.
If you pit those MMA guys to a boxing only allowed match against a real boxer, the boxer would win.
Same if you pit MMA practitioners against Russian Greco-Roman wrestlers to a wrestling only match, the pure wrestler would win.
But if you take the MMA guys to an anything goes match against a boxer or wrestler, the MMA dude would whoop some ass.
BZ wrote:After watching Tony Jaa's movies, I was totally inspired to learn some Muay Thai
I read that Muay Thai is really an "offense is the best defense" type of martial art. Unlike other martial art disciplines that seek to neutralize or subdue the attacker without doing any unecessary harm than what is required, Muay Thai focuses on beating your opponent to a bloody pulp as possible as a form of self-defense.
I like it.
Eugene wrote:But if you're really stuck in a fight, like a real fight, the goal is to hit the other person as hard as you can with the biggest object you can find.
Now that's keeping it real.
