For informational purposes

by **Christopherson** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:28 am

First of all, I would like to apologize a bit to Riot. I went a little bit overboard, just taking out the stress of midterms on a video game board, thats all. I'm just tired of topics always getting diverted into some other random debate between two or three people. Riot, you need to not take shit so personal. All Scorer--20 said was that he searched gays and found that picture, bush, and james; then you took it as a personal insult. Oh and Scorer--20, you need to be careful about saying things you can't back up. Anytime you call the "leader of the free world" a freaking murderer, you aren't going to get a warm response.

by **Matthew** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:36 am

I wonder how Andreas feels now.

by **Riot** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:52 am

baldus_2004 wrote:First of all, I would like to apologize a bit to Riot. I went a little bit overboard, just taking out the stress of midterms on a video game board, thats all. I'm just tired of topics always getting diverted into some other random debate between two or three people. Riot, you need to not take shit so personal. All Scorer--20 said was that he searched gays and found that picture, bush, and james; then you took it as a personal insult. Oh and Scorer--20, you need to be careful about saying things you can't back up. Anytime you call the "leader of the free world" a freaking murderer, you aren't going to get a warm response.

I'm not going to try it but I highly doubt Mike James and President Bush both come up when you Google Image search the word "gay". If someone wants to test it go ahead. I figured he was doing it to take a shot at me (which didn't work) and I was curious if that was the best he had.

by **Scorer--20** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:12 pm

Im sorry , I just act like a retard ... my apologies.

Thanks baldus_2004 to make me think about this and can see Riot's point of view.

I didn't understand the whole idea ( maybe for the lenguage or just a bad reading )

Sorry , Riot for all the trouble.

PS: bush appears in the page 14

http://images.google.com.ar/images?q=ga ... t=234&sa=N

by **Nick** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:22 pm

Page 14? You dug very thoroughly through that google search didn't you.

by **Fitzy** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:26 pm

he didnt come up on page 14 for me, looks like he has 'safe search' off

by **bigh0rt** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:30 pm

Nick wrote:Page 14? You dug very thoroughly through that google search didn't you.

Tested it and that was the 2nd image. No Bush or James, unfortunately...

by **Jugs** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:46 pm

Wow. Get back on to the topic of the fucktards.

I have not much to say besides :shake:

by **The X** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:42 pm

Matthew wrote:I wonder how Andreas feels now.

probably the same as he did yesterday

by **Matthew** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:57 pm

Wow, thanks Andreas. I knew you would reply soon.

by **Matt** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:02 pm

what's going on here? What's this "revolt against the mods". Who's got problems, why?

by **BIG GREEN** on Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:10 pm

Buncha fuckers...they better keep their revolts off the forum...cause i warned um. I'll make no quams about banning people who got beef with me for no reason..cause i happen to be one of the "moderators".

by **Andreas Dahl** on Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:38 am

The X wrote:
Matthew wrote:I wonder how Andreas feels now.

probably the same as he did yesterday

Pretty much...

by **cyanide** on Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:59 am

Just adding to a relatively off-topic thread: What does Andreas have to do with this?

by **Jackal** on Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:06 am

I'm not sure if this is the case, but this is what I've gathered out of it.

Andreas isn't really interested in "punishing" Sit, I think he's more neutral towards the situation and Matthew feels he's being too "European".

That's my take on it, that's what I've made out of the tidbits I've read on the forums, I leave it to the two parties (Matthew and Andreas) to confirm or deny this, pure speculation.

by **Matthew** on Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:54 am

Andreas Dahl wrote:
The X wrote:
Matthew wrote:I wonder how Andreas feels now.

probably the same as he did yesterday
Pretty much...

Please don't spam.

The issue with myself and Andreas is his opinion that I should have just deleted the posts directed at me. So thererore, according to his excellent line of thinking some can be abusive to moderators, start a revolt numerous times, not follow rules and still be allowed to post their dynasty here (in the same thread ironically as the abusive tirade against the mods).

As I also said, it's easy for people to grandstand, but until they actually do grow some balls and have the ability to make a decision and punish someone, they really should "just offer an opinion" in a critical manner when they have no idea whats going on.

But hey, if you still feel that way, and wish to align yourself with Sit ( :lol:

) then by all means go for it.

by **Andreas Dahl** on Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:15 pm

Matthew wrote:I wonder how Andreas feels now.

Please don't spam. (:wink:)

And yes, it's about how I feel that deleting the entire thread was too much, or not right for that matter.
Now I told you that on MSN, and I don't see why bringing it up in public is worth doing; and why insulting me at the same time would be any good..

by **funk99** on Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:40 pm

What the hell is going on? Why the fuck are u making up this shit Nick? DO U FUCKING NOTICE MY NAME ON MSN IS || -=[Ĵ] ã [M] ĭ [Ĕ]=- || not Jami-e and i dont even have u on my list. Thanks for framing me man. I appreciate it

PS: i wasnt even online yesterday.

I use 3 or 4 question marks, i never full stop. i write in msn language. so u got it all wrong. if u want to frame me u gotta do bit better. I WRite gay as GEY on msn.

And i would never ask u Nick, cuz i hate u

Fucking Witless Bastards.

by **Nick** on Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:02 pm

Are you serious? That's an interesting angle to take - Complete denial.

I only posted what was copied to me from shadowgrin (J0seph). I don't see why he would make that up. And it's a bit too creative for someone to make up anyway, don't you think. If he or others would like to confirm that it's legit, by all means...

by **funk99** on Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:23 am

Nick wrote:Are you serious? That's an interesting angle to take - Complete denial.

I only posted what was copied to me from shadowgrin (J0seph). I don't see why he would make that up. And it's a bit too creative for someone to make up anyway, don't you think. If he or others would like to confirm that it's legit, by all means...

Yea he hates me too. Why wouldnt he make it up? Complete denial. Ask Pera, Ask Sit, ASk Fitzy. ASk Joker. HAS MY NAME CHANGED ON MSN IN THE PAST FEW MONTHS BEFORE THIS. NO

by **Nick** on Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:46 am

He hates you? He didn't even know who you were until the convo.

Oh, and you haven't changed your msn name? Well i didn't know that.

That seals the deal. That evidence is much too strong. Game over thread closed. Shit funk, you're good at this. Instant proof.

by **Jackal** on Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:36 am

It's a simple case of credibility...

Sit & Funk or Nick & Shadow, hmm, difficult.

by **Pera** on Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:35 am

I really don't want to get involved with this to much.
But since I have funk on my contacts list,I can say that funk didn't change his msn name (as far as I know).If you guys don't belive me,thats fine with me.I'm preety much neutral with this kind of stuff,so I'm not trying to be on anyone's side.Just seeing it from a neutral prespective.With that been said,ill just lay low as always with this kind of matters.

by **bigh0rt** on Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:40 am

I asked in the other thread, but maybe that was the wrong place... so I'll ask here.

If Sit and funk99 seem to be nothing other than giant pains in the asses, and are constantly causing problems and not much else; why are they still welcome here?? I've seen countless others banned at the drop of a hat for far lesser offenses. Why do these two get such a long rope that they continually hang themselves with?

by **funk99** on Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:06 am

bigh0rt wrote:I asked in the other thread, but maybe that was the wrong place... so I'll ask here.

If Sit and funk99 seem to be nothing other than giant pains in the asses, and are constantly causing problems and not much else; why are they still welcome here?? I've seen countless others banned at the drop of a hat for far lesser offenses. Why do these two get such a long rope that they continually hang themselves with?

If you think i caused this problem u are very very wrong. Think about it first and then write cause half of the time half of u's dont even know whats going on

For informational purposes

Who is online