j.23 wrote:i can tell you one thing -- anything past 15, with the exclusion of 16, is pure utter garbage. it gets uglier year in and year out. stick with the retros.
BZ wrote:j.23 wrote:i can tell you one thing -- anything past 15, with the exclusion of 16, is pure utter garbage. it gets uglier year in and year out. stick with the retros.
Except the Jordan 18's! Man, those were nice..
But on a sidenote, I think they should stop the collection at the 23rd design... awesome way to end it off
j.23 wrote:BZ wrote:j.23 wrote:i can tell you one thing -- anything past 15, with the exclusion of 16, is pure utter garbage. it gets uglier year in and year out. stick with the retros.
Except the Jordan 18's! Man, those were nice..
But on a sidenote, I think they should stop the collection at the 23rd design... awesome way to end it off
the jordan 18's that MJ wore were decent. the picture that you just posted up is exactly why i didn't exclude it from my decent list. hideous.. lol.
BZ wrote:j.23 wrote:i can tell you one thing -- anything past 15, with the exclusion of 16, is pure utter garbage. it gets uglier year in and year out. stick with the retros.
Except the Jordan 18's! Man, those were nice..
But on a sidenote, I think they should stop the collection at the 23rd design... awesome way to end it off
Andreas Dahl wrote:Lol, BZ, you should be very ashamed of youself![]()
Anyways, it goes without saying, the later the number, the more comfortable they get (with some exceptions, like with the XIV's ((y)) and the XV's ((n))). The I's are brutal for anything but casual wear, while the XXI's are the cream of the crop of today's shoes... My favourite are probably the III's or VI's though.
Matt wrote:^^That website is so annoying
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests