benji wrote:We're still on that stupidity? Giving Kidd the MVP in 2002 is as bad as giving Nash the MVP in any year...
A new oil refinery has not been built in the United States since 1976. During that time, our gasoline use has increased over 25 percent. The nation’s 149 existing refineries have been running at maximum capacity trying to meet record demand and, as a result, not only do we import oil, we actually have to import 10 percent of our daily gasoline from refineries overseas.
...
Consider the example of Arizona Clean Fuels, which has been trying to build a small refinery outside Yuma for almost 10 years. It took five years just to get air-quality permits. Now they hope to be operational in 2010, 15 years after they started the project.
...
in 1981 America had 315 oil refineries in operation; today, it has 144.
Riot wrote:As much as I love President Bush, he is not doing enough to stop the rising gas prices here in Minnesota. I was filling up my truck today and the pump shut off because the price went too high! What the hell! If I have to pay over $75 worth of gas I think it's time for someone to step up.
/end rant
Jugs wrote:Dont the Europeans use Diesel as its cheaper and they have more of it? I'm probably wrong though
Jugs wrote:Dont the Europeans use Diesel as its cheaper and they have more of it? I'm probably wrong though
Riot wrote:How come gas prices keep rising and the oil companies profits keep rising with them? I would have no problem with them rising and rising their prices because they have to but they don't and they are doing it because they can and there is nothing we can do about it.
Riot wrote:How come gas prices keep rising and the oil companies profits keep rising with them? I would have no problem with them rising and rising their prices because they have to but they don't and they are doing it because they can
Max Schulz, today, on NRO wrote:Americans are suffering high prices not because of a vast-yet-intricate conspiracy of global energy executives, Wall Streeters, and the owners and attendants of the nation’s 168,000 filling stations. If such a conspiracy indeed existed, and if these people and institutions had the power their critics are saying, then they simply never would have let the price of oil fall to $10 per barrel, as it did as recently as 1998.
...
The real culprit — or, to us a better word, explanation — is supply and demand, period. There is one global market for crude oil, and the price fluctuates. The world consumes 80 million barrels per day, a figure that has been growing steadily for years. As the oil appetites of developing countries have grown, along with the appetites of our own roaring economy, so has the pressure on suppliers all over the planet to meet rising demand. Accordingly, the price of oil has climbed and climbed and climbed. The average price of a barrel of oil in 2003 was $28. This week a barrel cost more than $70. The price of crude accounts for upwards of 50 percent of the cost of a gallon of gasoline. As crude prices have spiked, so, naturally, have gasoline prices.
...
Then there are the numerous federal and state clean-air regulations that drive up the cost of gasoline. During the 1990s specialized blends of gasoline were required for different parts of the country. Today more than a dozen different blends are used, depending on the region. This puts extra pressure on refiners, and adds to the price at the pump. The requirement in last year’s energy bill to add eight million gallons of ethanol into the nation’s gasoline supply will further drive up costs.
Finally, there are the prohibitions against domestic production of oil and gas that Congress has failed to remove. Conservative estimates suggest the United States has more than ten billion barrels of crude oil in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. There are untold amounts in the waters off the coasts of Florida and California. But federal policies prohibit energy companies from bringing those resources to market.
Rich Lowry, also today, on NRO wrote:The cackling oil executives have returned. They are the guys who sit around corporate boardrooms and decide how high the price of gas will be at the pump, rubbing their hands greedily and emitting squeals of Mephistophelean laughter all the while. These executives exist only in the imaginations of economic demagogues, but that doesn't make them seem any less real to Americans who are gripped by petroleum paranoia every time they don't like the price of gasoline.
...
Then there's the cackling executives' most inspired manipulation of all — the change of seasons. Without winter turning to summer, there would be no need to make the shift-over in seasonal blends of gasoline, with the inevitable pinch in supply that comes with it. Cato Institute energy analyst Jerry Taylor points out that there is a price-gouging debate every spring when refineries make this switch and prices bump up. This year the disruption has been compounded by refineries switching from using the environmentally suspect methyl tertiary-butyl ether as an additive in gasoline to using ethanol, which is hard to transport from the Midwest to the coasts. The story of how the cackling executives managed this one is too complicated to relate, let alone their secret alliance with environmentalists to limit domestic supply and thus prop up prices further.
Of course, there is a less seductively simple explanation of rising gas prices than that a handful of oil executives have planned it. In a world market, prices will go up and go down, and the forces that play into those trends are large, complicated and mostly uncontrollable. The foolish conceit of our politics is that the oil market works only when prices go down. When the prices go up, it's a scandal. So Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert and Majority Leader Bill Frist — showing either a dismaying attraction to the moronic or a desire to pretend to have such an attraction — have called on President Bush to investigate price gouging by the oil companies.
Maybe such an investigation will unravel a vast conspiracy of cackling executives, and the Federal Trade Commission will have to raid those corporate boardrooms to restore world crude-oil prices to their natural, low equilibrium. Such, at least, is the fevered dream of the petroleum paranoiacs.
Rep. Richard Pombo (R.-Calif.), chairman of the House Resources Committee wrote:"If America was facing shortages of milk or water, Congress would certainly take steps to increase supplies," Pombo continued. "But as soon as we start talking about oil and natural gas - the lifeblood of our economic and national security - liberals in Congress turn the simple principle of supply and demand on its head in ways that defy logic and common sense. Opposing everything accomplishes nothing, except high prices and economic vulnerability for Americans.
As developing nations like India and China increase the use of energy to improve the quality of life for their people, global demand for energy continues to rise with prices in tow. Fortunately, American taxpayers own roughly 2 billion acres of federal lands and the massive energy resources that lie beneath them. Putting Americans to work producing this energy is the key to lower prices and a strong economy.
While some in Congress chain themselves to the door of supply - keeping the resources of the ANWR, the deep ocean, and other federal lands under lock and key - many Americans today are struggling to get to work because of high gas prices. This country has made incredible strides in conservation and efficiency, and we must continue to improve, but Americans cannot conserve their way out of an empty tank of gas. Democrats must join Republicans to increase supply. There is no silver bullet in solving this side of the equation, but a billion barrels here, and a billion barrels there, and pretty soon we are talking about real energy.
Myron Ebell, on what Bush should do, wrote:He should be traveling across the country blaming the minority in Congress--Democrats and liberal Republicans--who continue to block policies to increase domestic energy production. The president, still suffering under the sad delusion that America is addicted to oil, seems to have forgotten that his policies would, if enacted, lead to increased energy supplies and lower prices over the next few years.
"This is a straightforward measure that will bring immediate relief to Americans facing $3-per-gallon gasoline prices," said U.S. Congressman John Shadegg, who today introduced the Ethanol Tax Relief Act. "With the gasoline additive MBTE being phased out, almost every gallon of gasoline sold in the United States is going to require ethanol. But right now our domestic ethanol supply is inadequate to meet this increased demand. As the cost of ethanol rises, so do gasoline prices. The answer is to temporarily suspend the tariff on imported ethanol."
MBTE is used as a fuel oxygenate to reduce air pollution. It currently constitutes 1.4 percent of the U.S. gasoline supply, but Congress' failure to pass MBTE liability protection last year means that MBTE producers are getting out of the business as rapidly as possible.
"Democrats in Washington are suggesting we raise taxes on energy companies - but that is exactly the wrong thing to do," Shadegg said.
The only remaining approved oxygenate is ethanol. In an effort to protect our domestic ethanol industry, the U.S. levies a tariff of 2.5 percent and a 54-cent per gallon duty on imported ethanol. For the time being, however, the domestic ethanol supply is simply inadequate. The result is higher gasoline prices. Rep. Shadegg's bill would suspend the taxes on imported ethanol until January 1, 2007, increasing supply and lowering prices.
"The U.S. ethanol supply will catch up to demand soon," Shadegg said. "But American families need help now."
Jonah Goldberg wrote:Has anyone looked into the outrageous price of saffron? It is outrageously expensive. A single gas tank full of the stuff would cost millions. This criminal state of affairs has gone on for decades, if not millennia, and yet our leaders do nothing? Why is the DOJ ignoring this gouging of Americans too poor to afford the exotic flavoring of their rice? Where is Frist? Where is Hastert? Surely, we cannot leave this important issue to the market.
...
We are horribly dependent on foreign oil. But we shouldn't develop domestic oil or boost our refining capacity. We need a gas tax to wean Americans from foreign oil, but high gas prices are an outrage. We need alternative forms of energy, but we shouldn't use nuclear power. We need renewable, sustainable energy, unless it spoils the view of rich liberal icons. (Ted Kennedy's resistance to windmills near his compound.) Got it?
...
From a reader:
Your saffron suggestion reminds me of one of my alltime fave SNL quips. From a Weekend Update sketch: "New Scientist magazine reported that in the future, cars could be powered by hazelnuts. That's encouraging, considering an eight-ounce jar of hazelnuts costs about nine dollars. Yeah, I've got an idea for a car that runs on bald eagle heads and Faberge eggs."
Riot wrote:What do you think we can do to stop the rising gas prices? I am considering turning in my beloved truck and getting a more fuel efficient car because as a student I cannot afford these gas prices.
Crude oil and gasoline futures fell Tuesday after President Bush gave the Environmental Protection Agency the authority to relax regional clean-fuel standards to attract more imports of gasoline to the United States and to make it easier for supplies to be moved from one state to another.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests