by Eugene on Fri May 16, 2003 3:27 pm
Hey guys, it's been a while.
So, I watched the Lakers lose tonight. Needless to say, I was not happy. I would liked to have seen Kobe Bryant play more. On a personal note, I would've liked to see the Lakers advance (because I enjoy watching Kobe play), but as a fan of the game, I am happy for the San Antonio Spurs. They did play much better basketball than the Lakers did.
There are several explanations for why the Lakers lost, starting with injuries and ending with injuries and poor execution inbetween. But there are no excuses. It is simply too late in the season for the defending champs to be making excuses.
There is a positive in every situation, even in the most bleak ones, and the positive here might be that this loss could have been the thing to motivate the Lakers and wake them up to the fact that they simply cannot coast through the first three quarters and trust in "flipping the switch" in the fourth. I think (I hope) we'll see a much more motivated Lakers squad.
The Lakers cannot be successful with the team they have. Robert Horry can be effective as a veteran role player coming off the bench. Likewise for Fox, Fisher, and Shaw. They are valuable, key players for the next run. However, nearly everyone else is expendable. Slava Medvendenko has shown some impressive offensive capabilities, but not much else. Samaki Walker can be a gifted defender when the mood strikes him. Mark Madsen took their playing time on heart alone. As the Lakers coaching staff said, if you were to put those three players together (Slava's offense, Samaki's shot-blocking, Mad Dog's heart), you'd have one heck of a player. Devean George is the only player with trade value, but I believe he can pan out to be a legitimate 16 and 6 player. There is no reason to trade him unless an offer comes for a solid power forward.
The Lakers have a mid-level exception, but right now, they can't afford to get older by adding Karl Malone and Scottie Pippen. However, it is their only option. They have a relatively low pick in a very weak draft. Ideally, they'd be able to add Gary Payton to their roster, a point guard who could provide size and defense in the backcourt. Since Payton and Bryant can both play back to the basket, the triple-post offense will be that much more threatening when Shaq sits down. The best we can do now is grab 2 of those three players and hope that they can hold out until Devean George and the other young guys break out.
But what I want to know is why everyone hates the Lakers? It's not that they play terrible basketball. When they play the Triangle offense, it is some of the best basketball in the league. It can't be because they have won the past 3 championships because it is unfair to blame a team for their success. So why all the animosity?
"watching the spurs whip the lakers to advance to the western conference finals & and seeing big country bryant CRY: PRICELESS"
This doesn't seem like outright hatred, but limp is very smug about this Lakers loss.
Andrew makes a good point--the Lakers at times seem to be lackadaisical and overconfident. I don't think we'll see much of that anymore.
"Kobe cryin'... priceless"
I may be taking this the wrong way, but why do you derive pleasure from Kobe's suffering? Is your heart made of stone? I kind of expected this from Kobe because of his competitive nature. At least he wasn't laughing in the last four minutes of a blow-out after a certain Detroit team came back from 3-1 deficit in the series against them.
And let's say this right now. There is nothing wrong with a man crying. To deny our emotions is to deny the very reason that we play basketball and sports in general. To be an athlete is to be passionate.
But my favorite...
"Lakers eat sh*... go spurs... robert horry is [flaming] faggot of the series..."
other than the horribly inappropriate remark about homosexuality (that's what I assumed "flaming faggot" meant, if I'm wrong, I apologize for misunderstanding), why the put downs? Because the Lakers beat the sixers a couple years ago? Are you just as mad at Boston for beating them last playoffs?
The Spurs have a very good team, which a legitimate MVP, solid role players and a couple of players who'll one day be very special (Parker and Ginobili). And, they played a much better series than the Lakers did. This doesn't make the Lakers a bad team. Just like the Timberwolves and the Suns were not bad teams for losing their series. Just like Boston was not a bad team for getting swept (knock on wood).
Will there be such reaction if the Spurs lose? If the Nets lose? Detroit? Philly? Mavs? Why are the Lakers the target of such animosity?
To quote Forrest Gump, "and that's all I have to say about that."
All the best,
Eugene
The task of the artist is to translate for us the essence of things we take for granted.