Lakers

by **Fresh8** on Thu May 15, 2003 10:15 am

I still have total confidence in the Lakers. I mean they were 3-2 down to Kings last year and weren't they losing to Portland in their first Championship season?

They'll win!

by . on Thu May 15, 2003 10:23 am

Same here

by **Jonesy** on Thu May 15, 2003 10:46 am

I think they are done. I must admit they always play well with their backs to the wall but this is a weaker team then the last 3 and the loss of Fox has hurt them pretty bad. I think the Spurs will clinch it in the next game.

Maybe i'm being a bit quick to count out a champion but i guess we will see. :wink:

by **Shep** on Thu May 15, 2003 11:05 am

lakers will win championship

by **Big Answer** on Thu May 15, 2003 12:24 pm

hummmmmmmm......I dunno.....
I mean, everything is possible.....
I have 2 admit that I still don't see the Spurs or Mavs ( or Kings) winning the NBA title.....Would be kinda weird after 3 years of Lakers domination.

BTW, if Horry made that fuckin shot, Lakers would have clinched tomorrow IMO... But now, I would say the Spurs will win in 7.

by **Fresh8** on Thu May 15, 2003 12:37 pm

Scre you bitch! How could you bloody go for the fuckin' Spurs... Man- so much for inspiration!!

by **Fresh8** on Thu May 15, 2003 12:38 pm

Scre you bitch! How could you bloody go for the fuckin' Spurs... Man- so much for inspiration!!

:evil:

YouTube · by **Andrew** on Thu May 15, 2003 12:41 pm

People are allowed to follow the team of their choice. Not everybody has to follow the Lakers. Your post was unnecessary - please do not repeat this behaviour.

by **Fresh8** on Thu May 15, 2003 2:26 pm

Sorry man... I sorta siked up cause everyones pissin' me off today.

YouTube · by **Andrew** on Thu May 15, 2003 2:41 pm

It's cool, just make sure it doesn't happen again.

by **Boyk** on Fri May 16, 2003 12:09 am

i still have faith in lakers of course, ive been a fan for 11 years im not just gonna say there down and out.

I have a HUGE feeling Horry is gonna hit a big shot down the stretch tommorrow, probably not a game winning shot, but definately a big shot

I have a feeeling kobe and shaq will combine for about 60-75 even 80 points of the lakers.
both will play huge.

A little off topic, where the fuck did Medvadenko pop out from lol
13pnts in 15mins lol, that should be horry with the 13 lol

anyway..............I still believe lakers will win the series, they did it last year agaisnt a better team.

by . on Fri May 16, 2003 1:05 am

Medvedenko can play like this. There´s nothing wrong with his offense, its his defense that keeps him on the bench for a long period

by **Rens** on Fri May 16, 2003 2:22 am

Yet he has the "lock" symbol in NBA Live

by . on Fri May 16, 2003 3:29 am

Dan Gadzuric wrote:Yet he has the "lock" symbol in NBA Live

hmmm.....ok :roll:

why not, compare the REAL NBA with a video game full of bugs (y)

by **Boyk** on Fri May 16, 2003 3:33 am

Kobe4mvp wrote:
Dan Gadzuric wrote:Yet he has the "lock" symbol in NBA Live

hmmm.....ok why not, compare the REAL NBA with a video game full of bugs

by **Rens** on Fri May 16, 2003 5:07 am

Alright, and let's also ignore the point being made in posts.. like in mine where I was saying how wrong NBA Live was in this instance.. :roll:

by **Steve04** on Fri May 16, 2003 6:10 am

I think everyone is overlooking the fact that Shaq is not what he once was, granted he is still the best Center, but not as dominant as before, he is slower, heavier, and still does not rebound well.

After a while, people pushing,shoving,hacking,grabbing wears you down, especially when you get older and especially since it has gone up since he won a title and it does not get called.

by **Steve04** on Fri May 16, 2003 6:13 am

will_K8 wrote:Scre you bitch! How could you bloody go for the fuckin' Spurs... Man- so much for inspiration!!

lol, you posted expecting all non Lakers fans to be "inspired" and awed by the Lakers that they would all turn around jump on the bandwagon and agree with you?

everyone is entitled to their opinion :wink:

and in my op. you were not very inspiring

But as for my two cents I think the Lakers will win game 6 and if Shaq comes to play in game 7 they will win that too, otherwise its the Mavs Vs the Spurs. :shock:

by **Boyk** on Fri May 16, 2003 6:28 am

Dan Gadzuric wrote:Alright, and let's also ignore the point being made in posts.. like in mine where I was saying how wrong NBA Live was in this instance..

Well you didnt really explain your point well didya :roll:

YouTube · by **Andrew** on Fri May 16, 2003 1:21 pm

I predict the Spurs will win Game 6, something like 110-82...OK, so I cheated. :wink:

by **Brave Sir Rubin** on Fri May 16, 2003 1:59 pm

you know i was talking with a couple of mates today, and i just said..."i bet the spurs will win like 110-80.."

well...not really...but it was worth posting...wuhuhahaha...i'm evil...and bored may i add...

by **MaD_hAND1e** on Fri May 16, 2003 2:00 pm

I think this should be better for the lakers~~ imo, it poses as a wake up call for the team owners to get off their fatass and do some serious shopping in the FA market for some quality players that they can uses as a consistent sixth man. I say they should trade horry and fox and maybe even shaw. next year they should start george.
I hope they can get juwan howard~~

by **Bill Russell** on Fri May 16, 2003 2:05 pm

will_K8 wrote:I still have total confidence in the Lakers. I mean they were 3-2 down to Kings last year and weren't they losing to Portland in their first Championship season?

They'll win!

Heh!!

by **Clinton** on Fri May 16, 2003 5:14 pm

I agree this will only do the Lakers good. It was a wakeup that they need something beyond Kobe and Shaq. They need to pick up a decent free agent, someone who will take a paycut in hopes of winning a championship and therefore raising their stock.

by **Matthew** on Fri May 16, 2003 5:19 pm

I think they can only get a veteran, like a Karl Malone or Pippen. Who do you think L.A. will be able to get?

And if they get no one, will they be contendors next year?

Lakers

Lakers

Re: Lakers

Who is online