Sun May 01, 2005 4:59 am
its really hard, becuase patrick ewing had to go through a era that had the best player of all time.
Not to mention that he was actually 6' 9" , rather than the 7' he was listed as...
Sun May 01, 2005 5:11 pm
Jeffx wrote:Amphatoast wrote:its really hard, becuase patrick ewing had to go through a era that had the best player of all time. But yeah, 1994 was the year.. '99 was just a great run, i wish ewing was able to comeback and help them in the finals
Amp, the Knicks had the Bulls on the ropes in '93 and couldn't close the deal(f-n Charles Smith, burns my ass to this day). I know the Knicks would have handled the Suns in the Finals.
ahh good times...
seriously though, that suns team was pretty damn good...62 wins. i'm not sure nyk could take them out so easily. they were almost athletic as chicago AND they had a great low post threat in sir charles
Mon May 02, 2005 4:45 am
Whoa, whoa....I didn't say it would have been easy, air gordon. I think the Knicks take that series in 7, with a couple of OT games.
Mon May 02, 2005 5:47 am
Hey you Knicks fans.
Pisses me off seeing Marbury stuck with the team of undersized power forwards.
Pisses me off seeing Marbury stuck with the team of undersized power forwards.
Mon May 02, 2005 9:21 am
Jeffx wrote:Whoa, whoa....I didn't say it would have been easy, air gordon. I think the Knicks take that series in 7, with a couple of OT games.
k my mistake- "handled" sounds like a cake walk to me. no worries
Fri May 20, 2005 2:12 pm
why did the knicks trade Nazr... he is playing very good with the Spurs now.. he could be a top 15 Center in the NBA soon.. stupid knicks..
Sun May 22, 2005 8:18 am
Amphatoast wrote:why did the knicks trade Nazr... he is playing very good with the Spurs now.. he could be a top 15 Center in the NBA soon.. stupid knicks..
Why is it so many cats IMPROVE once they leave the Knicks?
Sun May 22, 2005 3:56 pm
In the case of Nazr Mohammed, I think it's a bit of an illusion. In terms of his production his numbers are down and I can't imagine his skills have improved greatly since the trade, he's just part of a better team. He's contributing in a system that's winning games.
Sun May 22, 2005 4:03 pm
Jeffx wrote:Amphatoast wrote:why did the knicks trade Nazr... he is playing very good with the Spurs now.. he could be a top 15 Center in the NBA soon.. stupid knicks..
Why is it so many cats IMPROVE once they leave the Knicks?
He was doing just as good, probably better, with the Knicks.
Sun May 22, 2005 4:13 pm
Statistically speaking, he was better in New York as his role was different. He's playing just as well as he was for the Knicks, he's simply in a winning system now.
Wed May 25, 2005 1:44 pm
knicks got the 8th pick in the lottery, any ideas what isiah will do with it?
Wed May 25, 2005 2:05 pm
How about a 6'10" power forward? 
Wed May 25, 2005 2:26 pm
With the 6'8 Sean May around? I don't think so 
Wed May 25, 2005 2:35 pm
[quote="John Starks"\
Q: Now that we know the Knicks are number eight, who do think they should pick?
Starks: We’re just going to try to get the best player available at that slot. Obviously, our needs are at the center spot. I’m pretty sure we’re going to try to get the best available big man possible. [/quote]
Well there we go.
Q: Now that we know the Knicks are number eight, who do think they should pick?
Starks: We’re just going to try to get the best player available at that slot. Obviously, our needs are at the center spot. I’m pretty sure we’re going to try to get the best available big man possible. [/quote]
Well there we go.
Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:33 am
knicks back in the news. Rumor season just began. Time for tim thomas and penny to be the focual points of the rumors
Fri Jun 24, 2005 8:33 am
Did any of check out the Allan Houston thread? Looks like he may be done(thankfully!)
Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:43 am
Why would Marbury be untouchable? I can think of at least 3 point guards I would want in front of Marbury (No, Tinsley is not one of them )
)
Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:54 am
The only way he would get traded is if NY can draft paul or williams which won't happen...so Marbury isn't going anywhere...unless felton or some other point is good enough to start.
Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:34 am
no one should be safe from being including in a trade on a team like the knicks
Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:43 pm
yeah,they are loving PF s like Tim Thomas(%100 he is a PF next season) 
Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:40 am
WFAN's Joe Beningo just asked Ian O'Connor how bad will the Knicks screw up the draft this year. Joe & his co-host(Sid Rosenberg) reviewed the Knicks draft history, and it is sorry.
O'Connor has the Knicks taking Bynum(if Frye's not there).
O'Connor has the Knicks taking Bynum(if Frye's not there).
Marbury to the Hawks?
Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:09 am
That's what I just read at realgm.com. Supposedly the Knicks & Hawks are discussing a blockbuster trade involving Starbury and Al Harrington. Don't know if it's true or not.
Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:08 pm
lol if the knicks trade marbury to the hawks i think its time to fire isiah thomas
Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:03 pm
Amphatoast wrote:lol if the knicks trade marbury to the hawks i think its time to fire isiah thomas
No Amp, our best hope for the Knicks is Dolan selling the team. He's the big reason we're stuck in the middle with no way out.
