Top Selling shoe brand?

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

Top Selling shoe brand?

Postby kp4life on Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:12 pm

I had an argument with my friend over which shoe brand is most popular (meaning makes the most profit) in past 4-5 years. What do you guys think? i think 1)Nike 2)adidas 3)reebok
my friend thinks 1)Nike 2)reebok 3)adidas
I also wanna know the percentages.

And i got one more question for those shoes experts. Is Jordan a separate brand? Or is it under Nike? If it is totally a separate brand when did MJ came out of Nike and started to make his own brand? I just wanna know a brief background history. I'll be really appreciated. :)
kp4life
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 7:12 am
Location: new orleans, Louisiana

Postby Jowe on Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:14 pm

Nike.. duh.

Jordan brand is under the nike ownership.
Image
Fee Nick's Uns [15-10] says:
i'd suck allen iverson's cock any day -
Fee Nick's Uns [15-10] says:
just so i could say i've met allen iverson
User avatar
Jowe
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 5:46 pm
Location: Paradise City

Postby Mazzocchi on Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:16 pm

Jordans alone would still probally be number one
User avatar
Mazzocchi
Resident Mavericks Fan (Since 1994)
 
Posts: 3132
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 6:00 am
Location: The Darkside Of The Moon

Postby The GOAT on Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:17 pm

...and it always has been.

Jowe you were supposed to list your top 3 :doh:
I think
1. Nike
2. Adidas
3. Reebok
Image

There is no truth. There is only you and what you make the truth.
The GOAT
 
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:06 am
Location: Long Island, New York

Postby kp4life on Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:27 pm

I didn't know Jordan was under Nike. Hmm... then my friend was right on that part. I did some research and found out that reebok is #2 worldwide and adidas is #2 in the U.S. I told my friend that Jordan was a separate brand itself :(. I don't get it. How does the brand work then? I thought MJ was the owner himself. Does MJ own majority of stock for Jordan? I mean can somebody describe how all works, so I can explain to my friend?
kp4life
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 7:12 am
Location: new orleans, Louisiana

Postby kp4life on Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:36 pm

" Until late in 1997, Air Jordan Shoes were a part of the Nike, Inc. family. Nike unveiled a new marketing plan in 1997 and Jordan became it's own sub-brand of Nike with the release of The Air Jordan XIII, Air Jordan Team, and Air Jordan Trainers. From this point on, Jordan Brand products do not feature the Nike name or Nike Swoosh, and their only connection to Nike is a fine print address for Nike headquarters to be used for insurance purposes."

"only connection to Nike is a fine print address for Nike headquarters to be used for insurance purposes"

? So this means Nike doesn't get any profit off of Jordan? Jordan has their own CEO and owner? I'll do some more researches
kp4life
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 7:12 am
Location: new orleans, Louisiana

Postby cyanide on Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:37 pm

It's not the best example in the world, but it's kind of like how iPod or Quicktime is a brand name, but is owned by Apple. Another example is (Canadians know this one) the grocery store chain Save-On-Foods is actually owned by Overwaitea Food Group.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby Colin on Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:12 pm

cyanide wrote: the grocery store chain Save-On-Foods

"More, More, More!"

Stupid commercial...
C#
Image
Pretty Flaco
User avatar
Colin
 
Posts: 5913
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 7:02 am
Location: Van-City

Postby Andreas Dahl on Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:45 pm

Yea, that quote is correct. Shortly after the 13's came out the split was made, and after than another colourway of the XIII's came out (I'm guessing it was the Flints).
But I do belive that it is still Nike that is coming out with the Team Jordan (Jumpman) shoes. I'm not quite sure about that though...
Image
User avatar
Andreas Dahl
 
Posts: 5970
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Växjö, Sweden

Postby Cloudy on Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:57 pm

So Jumpman are not Jordan brands?
cloudy
Cloudy
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:39 pm

Postby Ruff Ryder on Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:25 am

Cloudy wrote:So Jumpman are not Jordan brands?

Jumpman is basically the same thing as Air Jordan brand.
Image

'Retired'

"You can’t drive a knife into a man’s back nine inches, pull it out six inches, and call it progress."-Malcolm X
User avatar
Ruff Ryder
 
Posts: 5996
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:17 am
Location: VA RLY

Postby Username123 on Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:21 am

I never bought Addidas, always bought Nikes and Rebooks. So its 1. Nike 2.Reebok 3. Addidas
Username123
 
Posts: 1996
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 12:10 pm

Postby Filip on Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:32 am

Wow, is that a fat albert version of lebron in your avatar :D
Anyway, it's always been Nike for me.
User avatar
Filip
 
Posts: 3911
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 7:59 am
Location: England

Postby -BHZMAFIA- on Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:17 am

I think And 1 has made alot of progress this season with the uprises, rekanizes and so on coming out. I know my high school team was sponsered by And 1.

1.) Nike
2.) Reebok
3. ) And 1
Last edited by -BHZMAFIA- on Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
-BHZMAFIA-
 
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 9:49 am
Location: Memphis

Postby FendeR` on Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:47 am

My friend just told me about how Sports Illustrated had an issue about how And 1 has made a big impact on basketball and basketball merchandise. Some of you might know that it started in Pennsylvania (it's actually near the town that I live in), but it was actually started by a bunch of pale white guys. :lol: :lol: :lol:

On topic though, I think it's
1. Nike
2. Reebok (because of Iverson's)
3. Adidas
FendeR` - Captain
Image
User avatar
FendeR`
 
Posts: 1763
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 2:50 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Tuomas on Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:05 pm

1. Nike
2. Adidas
3. Reebok
adidas is way popular
User avatar
Tuomas
 
Posts: 3166
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Finland

Postby cyanide on Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:25 am

If we consider soccer, then I think Adidas is way up there.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby J@3 on Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:37 am

I read an article somewhere on imagesfashion... while searching for this kinda thing that said Reebok had lost it's #2 spot to Adidas.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB


Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests