The Official DETROIT vs MIAMI Thread

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.

Who will prevail as the East champ?

Poll ended at Thu May 26, 2005 7:57 pm

Detroit
17
41%
Miami
24
59%
 
Total votes : 41

Postby The Game on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:22 pm

Matt wrote:all we need now is Shaq to come out talking his usual shit.

Oh were definitely gonna get that (N)
User avatar
The Game
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: Philippines

Postby Andrew on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:25 pm

The Game wrote:Low scoring games doesnt necessarily mean boring games :roll:


Correct. But low scoring games often come about as a result of ugly play. Take the Pistons' win earlier this year when they shot 0/15 or thereabouts in the fourth. That's a tremendous defensive effort to still win that game, but it's not great basketball either.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115127
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Wade hogs the ball the Heat lose

Postby furious1 on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:27 pm

In the lst 4 minutes of game seven Wade completly hogged the ball and because of that the Heat lost.

Go to Shaq in the fourth, what is so hard to understand about that?

Wade needs to go. The Heat will be a lot better with Shaq and a bunch of flunkies.
furious1
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:03 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby th3gh05t on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:30 pm

right.
stupidest idea ever

no wade, they wont even get this far.
:roll:
th3gh05t
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 11:09 am

Postby Matt on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:31 pm

in all fairness, if wade wasnt injured, detroit wouldnt have advanced. PERIOD


sure thing buddy.....only the strong survive, that's the way the NBA goes...there are no excuses.
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby th3gh05t on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:32 pm

im just stating the fact. if miami wasnt injured they wouldve won,

but detroit won. so its ok

just like the 99 champ spurs, theres always a, 'they won because yadiyadayada'
th3gh05t
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 11:09 am

Postby The Game on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:33 pm

Not great basketball? What's not great about watching great defense? I know most people watch basketball for the offense but im very interested to see how the spurs run their offense against the pistons defense, just as how i was interested to see how the spurs would run their offense against the spurs.
User avatar
The Game
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: Philippines

Postby The GOAT on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:34 pm

Dammit! Dammit dammit dammit dammit dammit! I need to come up with 2o BUCKS!
Image

There is no truth. There is only you and what you make the truth.
The GOAT
 
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:06 am
Location: Long Island, New York

Postby Andrew on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:38 pm

im very interested to see how the spurs run their offense against the pistons defense, just as how i was interested to see how the spurs would run their offense against the spurs.


In a Spurs/Spurs matchup, I'd pick the Spurs.

No, it's not great basketball to go a whole 12 minutes without a field goal. Like I said, it's a tremendous effort at the defensive end to still win a game without a single field goal in the fourth quarter, but it's not good basketball. It's an extremely poor effort and the offensive end and you won't win too many games playing that way.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115127
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby The Game on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:43 pm

LOL, sorry i meant suns versus spurs...

Its not great to see the defense that caused such a scoring drought?(Although such a scoring drought would be almost impossible IMO)

Wont win too many games playing that way? Pistons are in the finals for the second straight year so i dont know what the fuck your talking about...

Good basketball is not all about offense...
User avatar
The Game
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: Philippines

Postby The X on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:46 pm

Matt is right, only the strongest survived....maybe if Wade had of stepped in and played through pain in game 6, then it might never have come to game 7....

Pistons got the win and I'd say they deserved it....as much as I don't like certain Pistons, ya gotta luv Rip Hamilton, going all the way back to his UConn days (Y)
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Matt on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:47 pm

im just stating the fact. if miami wasnt injured they wouldve won


haha, facts? that's funny.
Image
User avatar
Matt
 
Posts: 7236
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Australia

Postby The X on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:50 pm

yeah, and if the Pacers had Artest, then they wouldn't have lost....

that's all subjective....teams have to play the cards they're dealt....Pistons got the win and deserved it....Pistons are more well-balanced....if the Heat got more of a contribution from the likes of Eddie Jones and Damon Jones then there chances would have increased greatly....Heat need to add more depth this off-season and come back stronger next season....
User avatar
The X
is
NLSC Team Member
 
Posts: 11499
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Andrew on Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:56 pm

Its not great to see the defense that caused such a scoring drought?(Although such a scoring drought would be almost impossible IMO)


Not unless the Pistons were defending themselves.

Wont win too many games playing that way? Pistons are in the finals for the second straight year so i dont know what the fuck your talking about...


Before you attack my posts like that, it might be worth reading them rather than skimming them and then trying to belittle my point of view. I was talking about the game in which they made zero field goals in the fourth quarter. They have won one game playing that way. I don't think shooting 0/15 in the fourth quarter is a recipe for success, it's fortunate they were able to defend well enough to hold off the other team.

For the record: the recap and boxscore for that game. It speaks volumes for great defense, but that doesn't prevent it from being an ugly game.

Good basketball is not all about offense...


No, but it's about playing well at both ends. And shooting 0/15 isn't playing well at one end. You're not always going to win with great defense alone. If you can't outscore your opponent, it doesn't matter how great your defense is because ultimately, that's how you win; scoring more points than your opponent. You need to stop them from scoring and score yourself. "Defense wins championships" has become an over-simplified cliche.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115127
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby The Game on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:00 pm

Exactly, your talking about that one game... :roll:
User avatar
The Game
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: Philippines

Postby J-Smoove on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:02 pm

The Game wrote:Not great basketball? What's not great about watching great defense? I know most people watch basketball for the offense but im very interested to see how the spurs run their offense against the pistons defense, just as how i was interested to see how the spurs would run their offense against the spurs.


thats why you're a loser.. defense is boring to watch. who honestly enjoys "good defense" and 0-15 droughts over high octane ballin'?

the majority of the world that aren't in-depth basketball fans look at things like this: shoots and makes= good. shoots and misses= person sucks, let someone else shoot and score. people don't get interested by "OMG! DID YOU SEE HOW GOOD THAT GUY PUTS HIS HAND IN HIS FACE?" anything defensively awesome would be a breakaway steal, badass dunk. but the net result is on offense, and that's really the only thing good about that sequence. a block is awesome too, but the perviously mentioned are just "stats" def, not legit D. that's why "good defense" = boring.
Image
Signature Created by The G.O.A.T.
User avatar
J-Smoove
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2003 6:10 pm

Postby Andrew on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:05 pm

And? What's your point? I was giving an example of ugly basketball and how it's not going to be successful, elaborating on my earlier point. Again, if you're going to belittle my posts, at least read them and counter them with points of your own.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115127
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Wade hogs the ball the Heat lose

Postby maes on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:06 pm

furious1 wrote:In the lst 4 minutes of game seven Wade completly hogged the ball and because of that the Heat lost.

Go to Shaq in the fourth, what is so hard to understand about that?

Wade needs to go. The Heat will be a lot better with Shaq and a bunch of flunkies.


Right, i agree. But do you think Miami can actually unload him? The guy is an overpaid slacker going only 24 PPG 5 RPG and 7 APG and doesn't play enough defense with 1.6 SPG and 1.1 BPG. The guy makes a whopping $2.8 M a year, i don't know too many teams that will able to handle that contract. And being at 23, he probably doesn't have too many years left in him.

Best to trade him for Paul Shirley and dodge a bullet with this guy.
maes
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:58 am
Location: Chicago

Postby fgrep15 on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:08 pm

Let the Laker fans rejoice
CP3 | Brand | Arenas | Calderon
Raptors | Wizards | Clippers
User avatar
fgrep15
 
Posts: 3172
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 1:43 am
Location: Canada

Postby furious1 on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:22 pm

I think they can package him and Eddie Jones for maybe Elton Brand or Ray Allen.

Shaq is all you need and the only reason the Heat lost is because they didn't get Shaq the ball!

Wade is a ballhog and he needs to go!!!
furious1
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:03 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby The Game on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:23 pm

thats why you're a loser.. defense is boring to watch. who honestly enjoys "good defense" and 0-15 droughts over high octane ballin'?

Dont talk about being a loser especially if your a hawks fan.. who enjoys good defense? People that have at least 1% basketball knowledge...

the majority of the world that aren't in-depth basketball fans look at things like this: shoots and makes= good. shoots and misses= person sucks, let someone else shoot and score. people don't get interested by "OMG! DID YOU SEE HOW GOOD THAT GUY PUTS HIS HAND IN HIS FACE?"

OMG!!!!1111!!!! you just pointed out the obvious!!!!11111!! :roll:

anything defensively awesome would be a breakaway steal, badass dunk. but the net result is on offense, and that's really the only thing good about that sequence. a block is awesome too, but the perviously mentioned are just "stats" def, not legit D. that's why "good defense" = boring.

No wonder the the hawks suck, their basketball knowledge is equal to that of their fans (N)


And? What's your point? I was giving an example of ugly basketball and how it's not going to be successful, elaborating on my earlier point. Again, if you're going to belittle my posts, at least read them and counter them with points of your own.

Point is that one game is not reason enough to say that the spurs-pistons series will be ugly, boring etc...
User avatar
The Game
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: Philippines

Postby MaD_hAND1e on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:33 pm

damn... I was hoping for DWade to come out with a stellar, history making perfomance a.l.a Willis Reed, Isaaih Thomas, Michael Jordan
I guess it's Detroit - 2,Shaq - 0.
Smurfs vs. Piss-tons in the finals
User avatar
MaD_hAND1e
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:09 pm

Postby Andrew on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:35 pm

Again, that's not what I was saying when I brought up that game. You commented that low scoring and defensive-minded games need not be boring and ugly, I pointed out an example of an ugly game. Not once did I say that that game was proof the series would be ugly, not once.
User avatar
Andrew
Retro Basketball Gamer
Administrator
 
Posts: 115127
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 8:51 pm
Location: Australia

Postby furious1 on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:35 pm

Damn that Wade he's such a ballhog!!!!!
furious1
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:03 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby The Game on Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:39 pm

Fine, but do you seriously think that the finals would be that ugly?
User avatar
The Game
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 2:16 pm
Location: Philippines

PreviousNext

Return to NBA & Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests