Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:35 pm
King DWeaver 99027 wrote:As you can see, one of Team Artest's nominated posts was after the closing of the debate....just curious if this is allowed....
cheers
X
Let them have their way, X... If they claim I cheated, than let them cheat to make things even.
no one's actually cheated. That's the thing. If I want to let someone submit something that was after the deadline, then I'll do it.... along the same lines, I didn't specify anywhere that you couldn't steal someone elses work and pass it off as your own. So technically you did everything by the rules. I can't do anything to repair your e-lawyer reputation though.
Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:51 pm
Jackal wrote:The point was to NOT use others' opinions but your own. What's the point of a debate if you're quoting someone else's shit.
Although Dweaver is on my team, Jackal is damn right here. In the meaning of the word "debate" thinking by yourself is included.
Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:56 pm
go DARKO go !
Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:00 am
And that crock of shit that you studied his shit
Maybe I should have used eloquence like that in the debate instead... You have a point there...
I can't do anything to repair your e-lawyer reputation though.
There goes a promising career... What is an e-lawyer anyway?
Looks like I'm providing some spice in this reality show... Heh, this is better than I expected...
Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:16 am
I've had a few people ask why I haven't "penalised" you or anything for what happened in the debate, but as you said you're a bit controversial so I don't really mind it. As long as you keep pissing people off, there'll be some interest in the show
Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:28 am
King DWeaver 99027 wrote:Maybe I should have used eloquence like that in the debate instead...
I'd rather see the words "crock of shit" knowing it's something I wrote than reading something copied off the net.
Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:33 am
"crock of shit" knowing it's something I wrote
At least we agree on that...
Well, since it seems to mean so much to you, I'll let you have the last word
\/
\/
\/
\/
\/
Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:00 am
Weis leads Artest 10-9...
Wow Colin, maybe we were wrong? I'm guessing everyone is seeing how long the posts are and being too lazy to read them, assuming that team Weis must be better (or should I say team Dweaver) because bigger is always better!
Hooray for spice!
Wow Colin, maybe we were wrong? I'm guessing everyone is seeing how long the posts are and being too lazy to read them, assuming that team Weis must be better (or should I say team Dweaver) because bigger is always better!
Hooray for spice!
Wed Apr 20, 2005 1:45 am
Weis leads Artest 10-9...
Wow Colin, maybe we were wrong? I'm guessing everyone is seeing how long the posts are and being too lazy to read them
So much for being impartial and not trying to affect the voters, right? Maybe they actually know a thing or two about what they're voting about, and they might actually not be the morons you present them to be... Food for thought.
Wed Apr 20, 2005 5:25 am
Yup, I definitely think they're all morons... I've only been posting here for what, 2, 3 years now? I only had to start a new msn account to add all the other nlsc people I couldn't fit in my first one? Clearly, I love to talk to everyone because they're morons. I only think that 2 of the members are morons, actually. I just didn't think people would read through essays worth of posting, find out it was copied, and still put down the vote for you.
In 2 years from now, when you've actually been here long enough to know what people are actually like, you can tell me what I "think". Until then, up yours, dicktree.
In 2 years from now, when you've actually been here long enough to know what people are actually like, you can tell me what I "think". Until then, up yours, dicktree.
Wed Apr 20, 2005 5:34 am
Until then, up yours, dicktree.
Owwww, and you were doing so well up until that line...
Wed Apr 20, 2005 5:40 am
HAHAHAHAHAH!!! Dweaver you're ohhhh sooooooooo funny! Do you often display this startling wit and humour during court???
OH WAIT! How could you go to court? You are on the NLSC 24 hours a day "battling" with people 5-10 years younger than you! But by all means, make fun of my "online insult style!"
Or maybe I could be like you and just copy things from other websites! Give me an hour, I bet I can find a whole list of insults online!!!!!
LOL
OH WAIT! How could you go to court? You are on the NLSC 24 hours a day "battling" with people 5-10 years younger than you! But by all means, make fun of my "online insult style!"
Or maybe I could be like you and just copy things from other websites! Give me an hour, I bet I can find a whole list of insults online!!!!!
LOL
Wed Apr 20, 2005 5:43 am
/\
/\
/\
/\
/\
/\
The Last Word.
Hehe,nice rant kid. Case Closed
/\
/\
/\
/\
/\
The Last Word.
Hehe,nice rant kid.
Case Closed
Wed Apr 20, 2005 5:52 am
Yeah, Team Weis up by two at 11.
Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:07 am
Why the fuck are people still voting for this douche?
Yes, I'm becoming really upset about a Message Board Reality Show, but I'd like one person who is not on Team Weis to tell me why the fuck they voted for them.
You're all idiots.
Yes, I'm becoming really upset about a Message Board Reality Show, but I'd like one person who is not on Team Weis to tell me why the fuck they voted for them.
You're all idiots.
Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:13 am
^ LMAO, sorry but that post was hilerious
Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:55 am
GloveGuy wrote:Why the fuck are people still voting for this douche?
Yes, I'm becoming really upset about a Message Board Reality Show, but I'd like one person who is not on Team Weis to tell me why the fuck they voted for them.
You're all idiots.
I might be able to explain:
Of course, I voted for Team Rodman, but as a student of information design, if anybody actually didn't bother reading any of them, they'll be the first to note that there is very little information from Team Artest and a crapload of information from Team Weis. Generally, people would assume that more information = more debate points. Sad, but true.
Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:42 am
Hmmmmmmm...hilerious...Filip wrote:^ LMAO, sorry but that post was hilerious
Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:02 am
cyanide wrote:GloveGuy wrote:Why the fuck are people still voting for this douche?
Yes, I'm becoming really upset about a Message Board Reality Show, but I'd like one person who is not on Team Weis to tell me why the fuck they voted for them.
You're all idiots.
I might be able to explain:
Of course, I voted for Team Rodman, but as a student of information design, if anybody actually didn't bother reading any of them, they'll be the first to note that there is very little information from Team Artest and a crapload of information from Team Weis. Generally, people would assume that more information = more debate points. Sad, but true.
Thanks gloveguy, and thanks cyanide... that's exactly what I was saying above when Dweaver told me I think everyone is a moron.
The nice thing about ours is it summarizes our side of the debate really well, and doesn't require War and Peace to get our points across.
C'mon people, vote for us, vote against dicktree!
Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:42 am
dicktree
By that do you mean a tree that looks like a dick or a dick that is as long as a tree? If it is the latter, then thanks for the compliment
Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:12 pm
Why the fuck are people still voting for this douche?
Yes, I'm becoming really upset about a Message Board Reality Show, but I'd like one person who is not on Team Weis to tell me why the fuck they voted for them.
You're all idiots.
All's fair in plagiarism and reality shows.
Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:25 pm
we're winning? this reality show is getting better all the time 
Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:42 pm
The vote's over, I'll compile the results and post things later.
Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:56 pm
although we didn't we it all as dweaver's ramblings proved to good on the day 
I'm glad we got upper hand in the matchup against Team Kemp (barely though)....good to see that I was able to contribute to this task unlike the 1st one with cyanide won it on his own....
as for Team Kemp, I think they did well in the debate, they had to put forward arguments that I don't think many of them believed in but did it well nonetheless
on to next task, interested to see what it is....
I'm glad we got upper hand in the matchup against Team Kemp (barely though)....good to see that I was able to contribute to this task unlike the 1st one with cyanide won it on his own....
as for Team Kemp, I think they did well in the debate, they had to put forward arguments that I don't think many of them believed in but did it well nonetheless
on to next task, interested to see what it is....