Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:28 am
Dramacydal wrote:^one more reason to dislike the Lakers.
Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:33 am
Dogg wrote:www.hot.ee/dmd0/bushuncensored.mov
Andreas Dahl wrote:Two nice videos to keep in consideration before going to vote;
Showing of a more serious side than we've seen before.
An outtake from one of the debates. It's hard to argue with him on this one
It's actually realy sad to see this and when keeping in mind that this is the man that is most likely to be one of the people with most power in the world during the next 4 years... Sad indeed.
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:20 am
Jackal wrote:Dramacydal wrote:^one more reason to dislike the Lakers.
Well, comments like these just go to show your level of intellectuality.
Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:07 am
Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:28 am
George W. Bush achieved the highest popular vote count ever.
Republicans pick up five seats in the Senate, hold the House, the governships and state legislatures. Democrats lose their Senate Minority Leader.
Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:37 am
Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:13 am
Actually, I do have more to say than "Get ready". I have lost all faith in this country. It is unbelievable how divided we currently are and we can only hope that Dubya doesn't increase this gap between his supporters and haters. Basically, I still can't believe that a little more than half of our citizens voted for a man who has trouble constucting full sentences. He's an embarassment and disgrace to this nation, and to the people who voted for him, I can only say...you will regret it.
Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:21 am
Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:53 am
EGarrett wrote:I can't say I'm unhappy that Bush won.
Terrorist leaders and warlords throughout the world are scared of him. As long as he controls the military I don't see anyone having the balls to attack us.
And while our market might turn into a scary corporate nightmare ...at least we'll be alive.
Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:41 pm
Why would you be? He tends to not listen to others & do what he pleases. Why would you be?
Hmm, Bin Laden seemed pretty confident he would remind us once again. He doesn't seem all that scared. Scared yes, not scared enough to stop sending/making tapes.
I don't know about others but I value respect over fear. Fear doesn't conquer the world, sooner or later someone will raise their voice & everyone will raise their voice and they might not be that scared anymore.
Yeah, as long as your ass is safe, that's all that counts, doesn't it? Who cares about the soldiers & civillians dying in Iraq, bah...you're alive, right?
Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:16 pm
Fri Nov 05, 2004 11:09 am
Jackal wrote:Why would you be? He tends to not listen to others & do what he pleases. Why would you be?
Hmm, Bin Laden seemed pretty confident he would remind us once again. He doesn't seem all that scared. Scared yes, not scared enough to stop sending/making tapes.
I don't know about others but I value respect over fear. Fear doesn't conquer the world, sooner or later someone will raise their voice & everyone will raise their voice and they might not be that scared anymore.
Yeah, as long as your ass is safe, that's all that counts, doesn't it? Who cares about the soldiers & civillians dying in Iraq, bah...you're alive, right?
Sat Nov 06, 2004 1:06 am
EGarrett wrote:Skillful ad hominem attack.
Experience will show you one day that the people who talk the most are the ones who act the least.
Was Bin Laden on tape threatening 9/11? No. Because when you're planning to act, you keep it as quiet as possible.
People were "raising their voice" at Hitler the whole time he was conquering Eastern Europe. He was stopped when people took up arms and fought him.
The most effective deterrent to a fight is being willing and able to fight.
That's why the Cold War never turned into armageddon. The Soviets knew (from the end of WWII) that the U.S. had devastating weapons and was willing to use them if attacked. Thus no real war had to happen.
That's the way the real world works, unfortunately.
The word "we" refers to more than one person.
The U.S. army is also volunteer. I wouldn't want anyone to die, but they knew what they were getting into when they signed up, and they were courageous enough to accept the risk of injury or death.
The hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's that Saddam gassed and tortured were not given that option.
Sat Nov 06, 2004 1:59 pm
Jackal wrote:]Wow, I'm impressed. Not only did I get a compliment from you but you actually didnt freak out & post...LOCKED!
Guess those "Counseling for Moderators with a clenched fist & locking addiction" events really helped. Congratulations. The first step to recovering is admitting you have a problem.
*Tear*, I'm so proud of you.
Anyways, that just goes to show that people that talk alot aren't afraid of acting out. I know you'd like them to be, but unfortunately not everyone is alike.
...
Oh, so because he made those tapes & actually made threats to attack, he won't? Only if he hadn't mentioned anything, then he would attack? Pff, the FBI, CIA & all of them are squirming for no reason. National security has been tightened for no reason, Bin Laden already made a tape, this means he wont attack. Silly governments, thinking he actually might be a threat.
Alright, I know it's not the same thing, but I'd like to bring up what transpired between you & me here for a moment.
Thanks for the history re-cap. The Soviets & the Americans decided not to attack eachother. Don't formulate it in such a way as if to say the Soviets were afraid.
They could've been patient, right? They could've stuck to looking for Bin Laden, right? No, they decided to go after Saddam.