
benji wrote:The only problem for the Spurs is if they've run out of gas and Miami has figured out how to take away their threes.koberulz wrote:When was this?
The decision to review Allen's three
During this.
jrlocke wrote:The Spurs collapse was the worst since the Trailblazers in the WC Finals back in the day. Missed FT's, awful coaching decisions, random luck. Amazingly crazy game.
SoF'nAwesome wrote:Let's see if 14 people rooting for Spurs are correct or the 4 rooting for Heat.
koberulz wrote:Is a score against you not a sub opportunity in the final minute? It is in FIBA, which I thought was part of the introduction of all those NBA rules a couple of years back.
The Heat are minus-12 for the series, but the James–Mike Miller–Ray Allen super-shooting trio is a crazy plus-50 in just 68 minutes, per NBA.com. The James-Miller-Chalmers trio is plus-43 in just 80 minutes, and the combination of those four players is a stunning plus-49 in just 29 total minutes together, per NBA.com.
Those four have only played 15 minutes total with Bosh. The other 14 have come with Chris Andersen in Bosh’s place, and that group has been so successful in those 14 minutes — plus-26 — they nearly break NBA.com’s stats database and replace it with that Home Alone image of Macaulay Culkin screaming.
Which is to say, depending on the flow of Game 7, Erik Spoelstra’s hook on Wade has to be quicker. This is the entire season on the line. He cannot just roll with Wade like it’s 2006 or 2008, trusting Wade’s “warrior” nature and big-game reputation. And he certainly cannot reserve precious late-game out-of-timeout possessions for Wade plays, as he did in calling for a Wade post-up with 2:40 left and the Heat up 87-84. Wade is 6-of-27 on post-ups during the playoffs, per Synergy Sports. He has drawn exactly zero fouls on those 27 shots. He has turned the ball over on 16 percent of his post-up possessions. His post-up game is dead. It might return at any moment — Wade is a crazy shot-maker, as Games 4 and 5 reminded us — but Spoelstra has to operate under the assumption that it is dead until next season.
...
Wade had value in this game, and he’s had value in this series. But his minutes have sometimes been out of proportion to his value, and Spoelstra has to find the right balance on Thursday night.
I like to ask point guards which bigs they hate facing in pick-and-rolls, and Bosh’s name almost always comes up. Point guards hate his speed, and they especially hate how wide he spreads his arms in his defensive stance. They always mention his arms.
Fun random note: The Heat, desperate for spacing when Wade is in the game, are often having Bosh stand out of bounds along the baseline to drag Duncan away from the rim. As I noted last week from San Antonio, the competition committee has recommended the league ban this ploy starting next season. The Heat are going to squeeze what they can get from it while it’s still legal.
Leonard is a monster already. Rewatch any possession on which you think LeBron could have attacked the rim more aggressively, and chances are you’ll catch Leonard doing something to make James think for an extra beat. He slithers through screens with crazy good footwork. His arms and hands are giant, and he knows how to use them to make the paint look more crowded than it really is. He has been a breakout star in these playoffs, and more than one executive I’ve talked to over the last 36 hours thinks that if the Spurs win, Leonard should be the MVP of the Finals.
koberulz wrote:Huh. I was under the impression you could sub after being scored on in the last minute, even without the replay.
Additionally, under any logical ruling the replay would've been a dead ball, and thus a sub opportunity whether they could have subbed after the bucket or not. If the referee blows the whistle and stops the game, how can the ball not be dead?
benji wrote:Replays are not considered dead balls. Ask the league.
hova- wrote:
NovU,
yeah, maybe, but the question is, does this Heat team need him? Wouldn't it be better to have a shooter at the two? Like the Jet was for the Mavs, like Green for the Spurs? I don't know about Allen, since he is washed up, but a good C would be more valuable than a good SG for the Heat imho.
hova- wrote:
So for these Playoffs, where Wade is playing underwhelmingly (cause of injury), if you could just trade Wade for a guy like Tyson Chandler (who earns the same money), the Heat would have no trouble winning it all. (My opinion)
benji wrote:Leonard is a monster already. Rewatch any possession on which you think LeBron could have attacked the rim more aggressively, and chances are you’ll catch Leonard doing something to make James think for an extra beat. He slithers through screens with crazy good footwork. His arms and hands are giant, and he knows how to use them to make the paint look more crowded than it really is. He has been a breakout star in these playoffs, and more than one executive I’ve talked to over the last 36 hours thinks that if the Spurs win, Leonard should be the MVP of the Finals.
volsey wrote:I still don't know why Pop didn't call time out down on the possession where Ginobili got fouled (who btw shouldn't be given the ball next game).
Andrew wrote:Had to feel for him after missing that free throw late in Game 6. Mind you, he's shooting under 65% from the line for the postseason, so it wasn't exactly a collapse of Nick Anderson in 1995 proportions.
NovU wrote:First, you should never ever break up the championship team just because the player had one bad series due to an injury. That's just absurd, especially when you consider Wade's talent.
Second, the team is in the midst of achieving something meaningful. How many teams historically has made to the Finals for 3 straight years? The team belongs to a group of historical elites in some perspective. You don't want to risk it just because Wade had one bad series due to his bum knee. That's just absurd #2.
Lastly, you are right, 'still a very good result though' indeed. It's not even close to a time where the Heat should be pressing a panic button, at least until the 'bad result' starts to happen regularly.
jrlocke wrote:the trailblazers were also playing against the refs back then too. just like the kings had to. the nba had a real love affair with the lakers back then
I have thought the officiating has been fine both ways. I am a Pacers fan, rooting against the Heat, and I just did not see where the officials were anything like the refs back in that series. THat series was bad in regards to strange fouls (as well as the Wade/Shaq finals).
hova- wrote:You are definitely right. It is more of a "what if" I am thinking of here. I doubt that Wade will ever leave the Heat (I hope it for him, so he is one of those rare one team winning guys), but what would a defensive presence in the paint bring this team? Would they be unstoppable? Or would they maybe lack the driving and perimetre D by Wade that LeBron also offers? Just "what if?"
benji wrote:LeBron is such a choker. And people were talking about him as an all-time great. As having possibly surpassed Kobe. What a joke.
velvet bliss wrote:Andrew, you the real MVP.
Andrew wrote:He who flops and flails to the Finals and a title, flops and flails best.
Game 7 will probably come down to what team's "Big 3" will out play the other! As I said on First take this morning,… http://say.ly/AJW65A6
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests