Andrew wrote:I don't think proximity is an issue when it comes to professional sports in Australia. Eight of the 20 NRL teams are based in Sydney, nine of the 17 AFL teams are based in Melbourne, Adelaide has two.
They're far more popular sports with far more teams in general, though. Not to mention that the Melbourne clubs all started out in the VFL, rather than being expansions to a national league, which wouldn't garner nearly the same level of support. AFL and rugby are popular in different places, too, so you see concentrations of teams in those areas.
Queensland already has three NBL teams to New South Wales' two
Queensland is also massive.
Melbourne had two or three teams during the NBL's heyday.
And constantly struggled with it.
I don't see why it has to be between Brisbane and Newcastle.
It doesn't, necessarily, but if it has to be I'd rather it be Brisbane. And by the look of it, the NBL isn't going to bring in more than one club at a time. There's no sense splurging on expansion clubs right now and ruining the league. Better to build what we've got and then slowly expand later.
They're two of the largest cities in the country, they were both founding teams in the NBL in 1979.
So were Nunawading, St Kilda and West Adelaide. I don't think that's reason to get any of those clubs back, either.
I say get them both back in the competition.
Eventually? Sure. But you don't want to expand too much too quickly, and you need a team that's not going to bankrupt itself in a couple of years. The league are being cautious with expansion, and I really can't blame them for that.
The X wrote:Australia needs to get Kyrie Irving to join team before Olympics to have a chance to medal.
Won't happen. Played for the US in the under 19s, so unless they let him go he's not allowed to play for anyone else, and they really have no reason to let him go.