Released UAR v12x Rosters (D-League) Final Version!!

only two things i see wrong with those scores... very low rebounding and assist totals. most NBA games will end with at least around 30 boards (at the very least) and some have close to 50 if it's an inside battle. lowering shooting success sliders and raising awarenesses for both teams seems to fix it for me when i have that problem. good job though i am in no way an expert on this stuff im just trying to help with some friendly comments! keep it up man

Obviously you can't do math...it's based on 7 minute Quarters (the REAL NBA is 12 minutes)....duhhhhh

You need to read everything I write...stop selectively reading.

good point. i have a habit of assuming everyone plays 10 minute quarters like i do sorry man i didn't mean anything by it, i was just trying to help.

only two things i see wrong with those scores... very low rebounding and assist totals. most NBA games will end with at least around 30 boards (at the very least) and some have close to 50 if it's an inside battle. lowering shooting success sliders and raising awarenesses for both teams seems to fix it for me when i have that problem. good job though i am in no way an expert on this stuff im just trying to help with some friendly comments! keep it up man

Obviously you can't do math...it's based on 7 minute Quarters (the REAL NBA is 12 minutes)....duhhhhh

You need to read everything I write...stop selectively reading.

good point. i have a habit of assuming everyone plays 10 minute quarters like i do sorry man i didn't mean anything by it, i was just trying to help.

No problem Bro.
I just wanted to make sure you realized it was based on 7 minute periods.

On June 23, 2011, TMZ reported that Artest had filed a petition in L.A. County Superior Court to change his name to Metta World Peace.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Artest

Blackmurf why not just message Darth all of those instead of posting a huge list here? LOL

Hey Bro,
Maybe he did it so people can get educated on NBA stuff if they haven't already...and so they can stop asking silly questions or making their opinions sound like FACTS.

Sorry about that but im just trying to say it would be easier for you.

Hey Bro,
Maybe he did it so people can get educated on NBA stuff if they haven't already...and so they can stop asking silly questions or making their opinions sound like FACTS.

Darth, please check your personal messages. Thank you.

Hey Bro,
Maybe he did it so people can get educated on NBA stuff if they haven't already...and so they can stop asking silly questions or making their opinions sound like FACTS.

Darth, please check your personal messages. Thank you.

Will do!!

Smurf has nice facts but still doesn't know how to correlate that into ratings, if you have kyrie irving rated 79 to start off with then you should also have John Wall, Derrick Rose, Russell Westbrook rated 85 minimum as rookies, same goes for the rest of the rookie ratings. And yes weak draft means weak draft, go listen to a couple Chris sherridan podcasts on his evaluation of these rookies, and comparing rookies to other nba players has no relevance.

jameer nelson and devin harris are rated 79, 80 in Darth's roster and Irving rated 79 is funny, maybe Irving will be 79 after 3 years in the league. Use perspective.

i thinks rookies ratings should be 75 as the highest IMO..

kyrie and derrick tied at 73 for highest rating, down from there. rookies need some room for us to improve them from season to season.

I think those ratings by Smurf are a bit too high. For one, in real life, almost 75% of the rookies don't even get to see floor time in the NBA. Them having higher ratings than guys like Matt Barnes, Channing Frye, Robin Lopez, Afflalo and all these guys would have them be burned into their benches once the CPU configures its own rotation up with player ratings (i.e. starting the next season in assoc mode). It's a hard balance because if you start them low, you might put too much "potential" on them and they basically become "untradeable". You start them high, and the next season they become franchise cornerstones, while some might be, its not like most of them will.

I agree with posters above, 75, the highest. I rec that Smurfs ratings be downgraded four to five points per category to:

The top 5 picks ratings between 71 to 75
lottery picks 6-14 ratings between 66 to 70.
picks 15 to 30 ratings between 60 to 65.
Picks 31 to 60 ratings between 60 above or below.

Maybe allow other lottery and 1st round picks a point above their range if they deserve it.

I think those ratings by Smurf are a bit too high. For one, in real life, almost 75% of the rookies don't even get to see floor time in the NBA. Them having higher ratings than guys like Matt Barnes, Channing Frye, Robin Lopez, Afflalo and all these guys would have them be burned into their benches once the CPU configures its own rotation up with player ratings (i.e. starting the next season in assoc mode). It's a hard balance because if you start them low, you might put too much "potential" on them and they basically become "untradeable". You start them high, and the next season they become franchise cornerstones, while some might be, its not like most of them will.

I agree with posters above, 75, the highest. I rec that Smurfs ratings be downgraded four to five points per category to:

The top 5 picks ratings between 71 to 75
lottery picks 6-14 ratings between 66 to 70.
picks 15 to 30 ratings between 60 to 65.
Picks 31 to 60 ratings between 60 above or below.

Maybe allow other lottery and 1st round picks a point above their range if they deserve it.

Yep I think that may be viable. I'm doing alot of testing. If I was to even post some of the game stat logs, it would start a fire. The good news is we have a viable range, my earlier range was too high. I think the Darkskinnet is pretty much on point except for tweaks.

I think those ratings by Smurf are a bit too high. For one, in real life, almost 75% of the rookies don't even get to see floor time in the NBA. Them having higher ratings than guys like Matt Barnes, Channing Frye, Robin Lopez, Afflalo and all these guys would have them be burned into their benches once the CPU configures its own rotation up with player ratings (i.e. starting the next season in assoc mode). It's a hard balance because if you start them low, you might put too much "potential" on them and they basically become "untradeable". You start them high, and the next season they become franchise cornerstones, while some might be, its not like most of them will.

I agree with posters above, 75, the highest. I rec that Smurfs ratings be downgraded four to five points per category to:

The top 5 picks ratings between 71 to 75
lottery picks 6-14 ratings between 66 to 70.
picks 15 to 30 ratings between 60 to 65.
Picks 31 to 60 ratings between 60 above or below.

Maybe allow other lottery and 1st round picks a point above their range if they deserve it.

Yep I think that may be viable. I'm doing alot of testing. If I was to even post some of the game stat logs, it would start a fire. The good news is we have a viable range, my earlier range was too high. I think the Darkskinnet is pretty much on point except for tweaks.

Thanks Bro...I got your PM

Great Feedback from your Beta Test!!!

Version 11x coming soon!! Thanks to the "UAR New Era" Team

Darth Skinett = Roster Creator / Ratings / Rotations / Blah Blah Blah

Black Smurf = UAR Player Ratings GURU

chicagoRAW = UAR Custom Shoe Specialist

Solovoy = UAR Player Portrait Guru
BabyFace = UAR Portrait & CF Guru

Skittles93 = UAR Player Creator and CF Manager and Player Data Specialist

UTP1985 & 187 = UAR Team Jersey Assassins

and our #1 Fan nevermind12131

Special Credits to
Kova
Juza
Johndoe
Gory
All the CF makers
All the Shoe Makers
All the Patchers I forgot to mention!!

You all are KINGS in my Book

You gonna release the Rosters within the new Photomod ?

Darth, you ever check your PM box? It's important, bro. Appreciate it.

Just played a 5 minute per quarter game in my new assoc
FEATURING the latest SUPERGLOBAL v.7 endorsed by Blake Griffin!

Gonna post some screenies for the latest UAR Photomod as soon as it releases. As for now, I'm using my preferred photomod.



mom! I'm flayhing!


Give me that ball! that's foh griffin!


Look at mah TEETH!

what will the next release include darth?? ETA 2days.. will this be a complete release?

You gonna release the Rosters within the new Photomod ?

Yeah...

The PhotoMod looks really nice.

Best one I have done so far

what will the next release include darth?? ETA 2days.. will this be a complete release?

Black Smurf calls it the BOMB!!! He's lovin the new Rosters!!

This release will be EPIC !!!

and Yes!! This is a Complete Update

With correct player ages, rookie contracts, player contracts?

Can't wait! Great work all of you...

sir darth..

Does it also include a PORTRAIT FILE AND THE PNG FILES FOR THE ROOKIES?

and sir darth one request can you make me a roster with a PERMANENT BLACK SOCKS..?

PLEASE....

Just played a 5 minute per quarter game in my new assoc
FEATURING the latest SUPERGLOBAL v.7 endorsed by Blake Griffin!

Gonna post some screenies for the latest UAR Photomod as soon as it releases. As for now, I'm using my preferred photomod.



mom! I'm flayhing!


Give me that ball! that's foh griffin!


Look at mah TEETH!

@Darth-Skinett, what Photomod or Global you used?

whats the version of your new photomod? V6??