Wed May 25, 2011 11:06 pm
Bibi - We’re proud that over one million Arab citizens of Israel have been enjoying these rights for decades. Of the 300 million Arabs in the Middle East and North Africa, only Israel’s Arab citizens enjoy real democratic rights. I want you to stop for a second and think about that. Of those 300 million Arabs, less than one-half of one-percent are truly free, and they’re all citizens of Israel!
The Palestinians share this small land with us. We seek a peace in which they will be neither Israel’s subjects nor its citizens. They should enjoy a national life of dignity as a free, viable and independent people in their own state. They should enjoy a prosperous economy, where their creativity and initiative can flourish.
We’ve already seen the beginnings of what is possible. In the last two years,
the Palestinians have begun to build a better life for themselves. Prime Minister Fayad has led this effort. I wish him a speedy recovery from his recent operation.
We’ve helped the Palestinian economy by removing hundreds of barriers and roadblocks to the free flow of goods and people. The results have been nothing short of remarkable. The Palestinian economy is booming. It’s growing by more than 10% a year.
Palestinian cities look very different today than they did just a few years ago. They have shopping malls, movie theaters, restaurants, banks. They even have e-businesses. This is all happening without peace. Imagine what could happen with peace. Peace would herald a new day for both peoples. It would make the dream of a broader Arab-Israeli peace a realistic possibility.
So now here is the question. You have to ask it. If the benefits of peace with the Palestinians are so clear, why has peace eluded us? Because all six Israeli Prime Ministers since the signing of Oslo accords agreed to establish a Palestinian state. Myself included. So why has peace not been achieved? Because so far, the Palestinians have been unwilling to accept a Palestinian state, if it meant accepting a Jewish state alongside it.
You see, our conflict has never been about the establishment of a Palestinian state. It has always been about the existence of the Jewish state. This is what this conflict is about. In 1947, the United Nations voted to partition the land into a Jewish state and an Arab state. The Jews said yes. The Palestinians said no. In recent years, the Palestinians twice refused generous offers by Israeli Prime Ministers, to establish a Palestinian state on virtually all the territory won by Israel in the Six Day War.
My friends, this must come to an end. President Abbas must do what I have done. I stood before my people, and I told you it wasn’t easy for me, and I said… “I will accept a Palestinian state.” It is time for President Abbas to stand before his people and say… “I will accept a Jewish state.”
This compromise must reflect the dramatic demographic changes that have occurred since 1967. The vast majority of the 650,000 Israelis who live beyond the 1967 lines, reside in neighborhoods and suburbs of Jerusalem and Greater Tel Aviv.
These areas are densely populated but geographically quite small. Under any realistic peace agreement, these areas, as well as other places of critical strategic and national importance, will be incorporated into the final borders of Israel.
The status of the settlements will be decided only in negotiations. But we must also be honest. So I am saying today something that should be said publicly by anyone serious about peace. In any peace agreement that ends the conflict, some settlements will end up beyond Israel’s borders. The precise delineation of those borders must be negotiated. We will be very generous on the size of a future Palestinian state. But as President Obama said, the border will be different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967. Israel will not return to the indefensible lines of 1967.
So peace must be anchored in security. In recent years, Israel withdrew from South Lebanon and Gaza. But we didn’t get peace. Instead, we got 12,000 thousand rockets fired from those areas on our cities, on our children, by Hezbollah and Hamas. The UN peacekeepers in Lebanon failed to prevent the smuggling of this weaponry. The European observers in Gaza evaporated overnight. So if Israel simply walked out of the territories, the flow of weapons into a future Palestinian state would be unchecked. Missiles fired from it could reach virtually every home in Israel in less than a minute. I want you to think about that too. Imagine that right now we all had less than 60 seconds to find shelter from an incoming rocket. Would you live that way? Would anyone live that way? Well, we aren’t going to live that way either.
The truth is that Israel needs unique security arrangements because of its unique size. Israel is one of the smallest countries in the world. Mr. Vice President, I’ll grant you this. It’s bigger than Delaware. It’s even bigger than Rhode Island. But that’s about it. Israel on the 1967 lines would be half the width of the Washington Beltway.
Hamas is not a partner for peace. Hamas remains committed to Israel’s destruction and to terrorism. They have a charter. That charter not only calls for the obliteration of Israel, but says ‘kill the Jews wherever you find them’. Hamas’ leader condemned the killing of Osama bin Laden and praised him as a holy warrior. Now again I want to make this clear. Israel is prepared to sit down today and negotiate peace with the Palestinian Authority. I believe we can fashion a brilliant future of peace for our children. But Israel will not negotiate with a Palestinian government backed by the Palestinian version of Al Qaeda.
Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s ... z1NMutvoGk
An Abbas aide, Nabil Shaath, called Netanyahu's outlines a "declaration of war" against the Palestinians and said the Israeli leader is not a partner for peace.
Netanyahu's nonrecognition of the Palestinian people's rights before the Congress makes the negotiations and the peace process with Israel absurd," Hamas spokesperson Sami Abu Zuhri said
Wed May 25, 2011 11:46 pm
Thu May 26, 2011 3:36 am
Thu May 26, 2011 7:34 am
Thu May 26, 2011 9:00 am
Qballer wrote:i meant technological advances were fairly even on both sides
Thu May 26, 2011 9:37 am
Thu May 26, 2011 5:27 pm
puttincomputers wrote:Why should the Palestinians be allowed to CONTINUE to fire 5,000 rockets per YEAR into Israel?
Why should Israel be forced to give up land to the people who want to destroy all jews?
koberulz wrote:What I want to know is why anyone who doesn't live there should give a damn.
Thu May 26, 2011 11:04 pm
benji wrote:puttincomputers wrote:Why should the Palestinians be allowed to CONTINUE to fire 5,000 rockets per YEAR into Israel?
Who's going to stop them?
benji wrote:Why should Israel be forced to give up land to the people who want to destroy all jews?
And who's going to make them?
[/quote]benji wrote:koberulz wrote:What I want to know is why anyone who doesn't live there should give a damn.
New to human history?
Thu May 26, 2011 11:07 pm
puttincomputers wrote:Um, Israel is trying to but everytime they go after the guys the UN tells Israel to stop!
Check out what the UN and Obama has been telling them to do!
Thu May 26, 2011 11:26 pm
Fri May 27, 2011 12:25 am
benji wrote:koberulz wrote:What I want to know is why anyone who doesn't live there should give a damn.
New to human history?
Fri May 27, 2011 5:20 am
koberulz wrote:Not particularly. I just don't see why everyone outside the region should be wasting so much time on trying to achieve peace, because it's never going to happen, and why we need debates about which finger-pointer on which side is right and whether anyone is being "fair" (whatever the hell that means). Doesn't matter what you do, they're going to keep fighting, so the less people you let it affect the better.
Fri May 27, 2011 6:35 am
puttincomputers wrote:Or the UN could go to war against israel.
puttincomputers wrote: If the muslims would destroy the jewish nation what would happen? Lets look at history. Do you know what happened when the Muslims took over much of Europe during the dark ages? They not only killed every person would not become a muslim they also burned every non muslim book they could find.
Fri May 27, 2011 12:03 pm
puttincomputers wrote:Btw check out this video and tell me what you think
puttincomputers wrote:My cousin was over there a few years ago. He went on a tour into the valley of Armageddon. Suddenly a military jet screamed overhead. It went behind a mountain and then all was silent! There was no sound of the jet continuing! There also was no sound of a crash! He didn't get it on video or camera because they are not allowed there. I wonder what big secret Israel is hiding.
puttincomputers wrote:Lets look at history. Do you know what happened when the Muslims took over much of Europe during the dark ages?
Fri May 27, 2011 10:46 pm
Fri May 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Fri May 27, 2011 11:15 pm
Fri May 27, 2011 11:16 pm
Fri May 27, 2011 11:23 pm
Sat May 28, 2011 4:14 am
Of particular importance was the rediscovery of the ancient classic texts, most notably the work of the Greek natural philosopher Aristotle, through retranslations from Arabic.
Sat May 28, 2011 9:08 am
Sat May 28, 2011 8:33 pm
puttincomputers wrote:Why not, it would get them more donations. Particularly from Sorros.
Sat May 28, 2011 10:43 pm
Sat May 28, 2011 11:02 pm
Sat May 28, 2011 11:20 pm