1. LeBron James / 6-8 / 240Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2005-11 | 25.7 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 1.55 | 0.78 | .574 | 116 | 28.1 | 15.7 | 10.7 | 5.0 | .247 |
I say it a lot on here, but he's not just great. Larry Bird is great. Larry Bird is amazing. LeBron is unfair. He's like later Magic in Karl Malone's body.
I'll be honest, I was as always skeptical of LeBron coming in. I thought the lack of shot and his body wouldn't make him an instant star. Boy was I wrong. The shot didn't matter. And well, he basically has the best body in NBA history.
Can anyone truly guard LeBron? Ever?
I'd love to live in an alternate history where I can take him and put him in 1962.
Really, no matter how much you hate LeBron, no matter how much you can pick at all his indvidual flaws or the fact he's not developed like he could. Look at this guy. I mean, jesus christ.
HIS PLAYOFF AVERAGES ARE 29.3/8.4/7.3. 27.1 PER. The last two are 37.4 (HOLY FUCK) and 28.6 on 61-62% TS. Are you fucking kidding me?
And he's 26?!? Really!
Like I said. Unfair. (Younger than me. What have I done with my life.

)
Let's note he willingly sacrified his personal stats to team up with his friends and make everything unfair for the next five years. And yet he still leads the league in PER and once the Heat figure things out we might as well scrap the whole affair.
If Bird is the Basketball Jesus, that makes LeBron the Basketball God.
2. Larry Bird / 6-9 / 220Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1982-88 | 24.3 | 9.4 | 6.0 | 1.68 | 0.82 | .580 | 118 | 25.3 | 14.5 | 9.3 | 5.3 | .231 |
What was once an obvious pick is now number two, but still far above everyone else.
It's somewhat interesting that Bird may fade with the younger cohort in the face of LeBron and Pippen. I mean, except for the Boston fanatics who will never let Bird go under any circumstances.
The fact is Bird is the only SF close to LeBron. We do have to set LeBron aside because he's unfair. (Did I mention that?) But Bird is still parsecs above the rest.
Bird is one of the smartest players to ever play the game.
One of the most aware players of all time. One of the best shooters ever. And entirely relentless. Look at the rest of this top ten, every single player was more athletic, but only LeBron (an unfair freak) was better. The Bird passing videos should be required viewing for everyone interested in basketball ever. The guy had a natural sense few others will have, the fact that LeBron is one of the few that has the same sense actually helps Bird.
There were SF's more athletic, SF's more raw talented, but none who participated fairly were as good as Bird. There's a real seperation of quality between LeBron, Bird and the rest. I can visualize it for you in many ways statistically, but you shouldn't have to see it in the numbers.
3. Julius Erving / 6-6 / 200Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1978-84 | 24.3 | 7.4 | 4.3 | 1.96 | 1.71 | .565 | 111 | 23.5 | 11.1 | 6.5 | 4.6 | .198 |
No, it wasn't his prime. But Erving still did few things that others have.
Scoring? One of the best. Rebounding? Up there as well. Distributing? Yep, in the upper tier. Add in almost two blocks and two steals a game? Sure.
How do we define what Erving was, in his era, for our younger fans. How about this. Take Tracy McGrady on offense, and add in some Scottie Pippen on defense. Yeah, that sounds right.
And since Erving is our #3, and Bird our #2, we have to mention when they put on one of the greatest shows the game has seen. 1981 Eastern Conference Finals.
4. Scottie Pippen / 6-8 / 210Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1991-97 | 19.1 | 7.1 | 5.7 | 2.15 | 0.87 | .547 | 112 | 21.3 | 11.5 | 6.0 | 5.6 | .185 |
Pippen could be considered either underrated or overrated depending on how you approach him. His lore is likely overrated, he was never the second best player behind Jordan, or the "most complete player" or "best all-around player" both tags he got in a similar manner to Kobe during his period with Shaq.
And yes, there may be a case that Pippen should get points off for only dominating when Jordan was gone. Look at his steal % for example. 2.9 overall, 4.0 in the two years Jordan was gone, leading the league in steal% and DRtg in 1995.
But Pippen was more than solid on offense, dominant on defense and maybe the best sidekick possible. Would he be the best player on a championship team? The best we can say is maybe. Can't say that about the three above him.
5. Adrian "God Damn" Dantley / 6-5 / 208Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1980-87 | 26.8 | 5.5 | 3.3 | 0.99 | 0.12 | .630 | 121 | 23.4 | 12.4 | 10.6 | 1.8 | .201 |
Okay, so I played more defense in the 1980s, but there's a case to be made that Dantley is greatest scorer in NBA History.
I know, you want the stats. Okay, how about the number of players who scored 24+ points per 36 and had a TS% of 61+% for their entire career?
Oh wait. There's only been one player ever. And that was God Damn.
Did I mention he was 6-5?
Did I mention he scored mostly off of posting up?
Did I mention in his prime he combined getting to the line at 10 times per 36 with 80+% FT%? And hit 53-58% from the field at the same time?
Did I mention he was 6-5?
Did I mentioned he led the NBA in ORtg twice, led it in OWS four times, finished in the top five in TS% six times and for his career is 4th all time? 13th in career OWS? 9th in career Ortg?
Admit it. Did you know about this guy before this post? Did you know about him before I started the completely moronic "God Damn" tag a few years ago?
Can you measure the shame you feel that one of the greatest, most unstoppable scorers of all time completely skipped your view?
Oh, oh, back to his defense? Fuck you, that's what God Damn says. You're scoring 20 on me, lol. I'm dropping 35 on the same number of shots. Deal with it.
Greatest scorer of all time? Naw, that's Wilt. Greatest scorer of the three point era? Yeah, we agree.
Jordan? Better overall offensive player? Most definitely. Better scorer? I can't, sorry. Even at his best Jordan was 30.5 on 59%, which is pretty fucking amazing. But look up there at the numbers, Dantley's at 27 on 63%. You think he couldn't put up three more shots? He did 29.7 at 63% in 1986. And he did 29.2 ON 65% JESUS CHRIST in 1983-84. In 1991 Jordan put up an ungodly 125 ORtg, in 1984 Dantley put up 126 with 50% more turnovers and a third fewer assists simply because of his scoring. Jordan the ultimate offensive player, Dantley the ultimate scorer. Case closed.
Now Mr. Durant has done 26.6 on .600 the last two years at 21-22, so we may need to rediscuss this in the future. Durant takes Dantley's post-game and turns it into outside shooting, then becomes absolutely automatic at the line while still getting there gobs. They're actually pretty comparable in assists and turnovers too. Durant has that whole 6-9 thing going for him. The Thunder should hire Dantley away from Denver to teach Durant his post-game.
6. Shawn Marion / 6-7 / 220Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2001-07 | 17.8 | 9.5 | 1.9 | 1.82 | 1.26 | .548 | 112 | 21.2 | 11.8 | 6.5 | 5.3 | .180 |
After Pippen, and maybe more so than Pippen, Marion is the best defensive player in this list. He even showed at the end of this era that he could defend and play the PF position.
Marion gets a lot of hype being next to Nash but he played well in the years before Nash came to town. He played well with Kidd, well with Marbury, well with Barbosa and well with Nash. He's almost the most ideal third option SF. He could score well cutting to the basket, but could also setup for three pointers. He hit the boards better than every other SF on this list, picked up steals, got blocks, etc.
He can't score off the dribble, nor pass well, but unlike other players he never tried to do things he can't. Instead Marion maximized what he could do either cutting to the basket for easy dunks or spotting up for threes. Then coming down on the other end and defending the other teams best perimeter scorer and/or cleaning up on the boards.
What really places Marion here is how he compares to everyone else. He's nowhere near as good offensively as Dantley, that's obvious. He's a step behind Pippen offensively. He's possibly as good as Pippen defensively though. Everyone below him scores more than he does but doesn't compare on the other end. If Marion gets any boost it's that he showed he could fit himself into different offenses and thrive at an efficient level by picking and choosing his shots. It's difficult to see some of the next few guys on the list being able to make as much of an impact overall if they're a third scorer as Marion did. That's mostly why he's here.
7. Tracy McGrady / 6-8 / 210Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2001-07 | 24.9 | 6.1 | 5.0 | 1.39 | 0.79 | .528 | 109 | 25.0 | 10.4 | 7.1 | 3.3 | .183 |
In 1991 Michael Jordan put up a PER of 31.6 In 2009, LeBron did 31.7 and Wade did 30.4.
In the 18 years inbetween only one perimeter player put up a PER greater than 30. (Shaq and David are not perimeter players.) (Let's remember something else. PER is set to 15 as AVERAGE each year. This means against that year.)
That one player was Tracy McGrady.
Until our modern stars kicked in nobody had replicated Jordan to that point but McGrady.
Tracy McGrady 2002-03:
29.3/5.9/5.0 Usage: 35.2%. Turnover rate: 8.4% OWS: 13.2.
Michael Jordan 1987-93:
30.5/5.9/5.5 Usage: 33.9%. Turnover rate: 9.5% OWS: 13.6.
Yes, it was one year only. But still. You're missing the point if you focus on that. For that one season, McGrady basically WAS Jordan.
Take the first five years and McGrady does 25/6/5 with a 25.6 PER. Just his time in Orlando is 26/6.5/5 with 26.4 PER. The three years he tried and before his back killed him: 26/7/5 on 26.7 PER.
There's an argument to be made that Tracy McGrady had the best season of any 23 year old ever:
http://bkref.com/tiny/EYRJ5 Both he and LeBron made the leap from superstar into unfair dominance that season. But while LeBron got even better and unfair at 24 and 25, McGrady regressed and his back issues compounded things.
There is a "what if" scenario where McGrady has no back problems and dominates the league. Although you can argue against this with JVG's recent comments. McGrady was a god from day one, he didn't have to work. He simply dominated from raw talent. Which is kinda scary. We all today can spend lots of time pointing out LeBron's flaws, but it's hard to deny he hasn't built his game over the last half-decade. McGrady didn't really, he was dominant but stuck on the bench until he got to Orlando when he blew up.
Imagine if he actually built upon his game. Dear god.
McGrady and Yao should have been an unstoppable force, but injuries and McGrady's "Iverson" solution to his increasing woes put an end to that.
Only ten players in history have used as many possessions as McGrady has over his career. One in higher on this list, another will be up shortly.
8. Marques Johnson / 6-7 / 218Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1978-84 | 21.7 | 7.7 | 3.8 | 1.38 | 0.87 | .566 | 114 | 21.2 | 10.2 | 6.7 | 3.4 | .187 |
White Men Can't Jump and Blue Chips aren't enough? INSIDE DRIVE ISN'T ENOUGH?
SHEEEEIITTTT.
The 1980s Bucks get NO RESPECT. NONE.
Look at your lists, look at my list. Scottie Pippen, Grant Hill, go back to the PGs, Magic Johnson. LeBron James. What do we call them? Point Forwards right? Who first created that term?
Did you guess Marques Johnson? Good boy.
Don Nelson ran out of point guards, so what did he do? Told Johnson to be the point guard. Then a couple years later cast Johnson off to the Clippers (where his career, like so many others died) and had Paul Pressey take over the role.
But remember we're talking about the primes, and that puts Johnson in our list. 22/8/4 is nothing to sniff at. And he was part of the Bucks great defense, so no slouch on that end.
Where does Johnson fall short? How about the fact that the two guys that sent him and his team home every fucking year are higher up on this list? There is literally no team that never made the Finals that can compare to the 1980s Bucks. Literally. There is no debate on this. The Kings peaked for only a couple years, the Nash Suns would have been shut the fuck out. The 1980s Bucks had to face the Sixers and Celtics of the 1980s. It wasn't fair. They even rebuilt in mid-process and still contended with half a new team. But nobody gives a shit.
Fuck the Fab Five, make a 1980s Bucks documentary.
9. Dominique Wilkins / 6-7 /200Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1986-92 | 26.9 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 1.43 | 0.62 | .542 | 114 | 23.3 | 10.1 | 7.4 | 2.7 | .174 |
The Human Highlight Film.
He certainly scored more than everyone else on this list. He also jacked more shots than everyone else on this list. Top ten in NBA HISTORY. To his credit he wasn't really wasteful since he got to the line a ton and thus bulked up his overing scoring percentage. But what else did he do? Not really anything.
There's two players in NBA History to use 30+% of their teams possessions while on the court while also assisting on 12.2% of less of their baskets. Wilkins and John Drew. Although Drew did have a third fewer assists. (Thus why I proposed him a few years back as the top ballhog ever.) Shrinking things to 13% assists, only brings in George Gervin which doesn't really help Wilkins.
So what we can we say more in regards for Wilkins? He was a pretty efficient scorer, and not a horrible defender when he wanted to put in the effort. He also was willing to spend his days in Atlanta which would raise questions for most human beings. But we can't really reward him for that. He put up 25/7 endlessly no matter what was around him, no matter how good the Hawks were. That sheer production makes it hard to kick him off any list.
10. Paul Pierce / 6-6 / 230Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2005-11 | 21.2 | 5.6 | 3.9 | 1.22 | 0.43 | .591 | 113 | 20.3 | 9.8 | 6.0 | 3.7 | .179 |
Sorry Grant.
Paul got his second half listed here. He also has 2001-07 which is a hair (literally) worse. But in reality his prime is 2001-11 with two years where he and the Celtics themselves gave up cut out. And that's really why I'm giving him the bump.
We're talking about 21/5.5/4 vs 23/6/4 with 113 vs 108 as the ORtg. Paul's played in two great defenses and thrived, Thibs' title winning one and O'Brien's fronting the post one. I won't hold it against him. First Pierce jacked more shots, second one had better shots. The difference is one basket.
But wait, benji, we're supposed to consider the top seven years? Dale with it. Pierce overlaps like Mr. Johnson, Mr. Stockton, Mr. Jordan and Mr. Malone. And one is quite better than Grant Hill, the other behind Hill, so we give him the bump and then back it up with the extra years. Problem solved. You wanna fight about it?
The Next FiveGrant Hill looks a lot like Pippen at 20/7/5.5 but he's slightly worse on defense. Plus he took like four years off, lazy bum.
Detlef Schrempf is probably the most underated SF ever. 18/7.5/4.5 on 60% scoring. Brutal. Is it any wonder the Sonics won so many games?
Pedja Stojakovic put up 19.3/5.2 on 59% during his prime which puts him up there and very comparable to
James Worthy who did 20.2/5.6/3.3 on 58% scoring. Lastly is
Andrei Kirilenko who looks ordinary at 14.4/6.8/3.2 until you realize his 1.66/2.69 steal/block ratios dominate everyone else and how he was the best defensive forward of his era once you factor out the injuries. Oh, and a case can be made he's the best defensive player of this fifteen. I personally go with that claim.
Anyone Else? Even if they suck?Cedric Maxwell scored at 64% but only for 16.3 per game.
Chris Mullin did 22/5/4 on 59%.
Alex English did 27.1/5.6/4.7 but I played more defense from 1982-88 even though I was only alive for like half that period. Speaking of people who never played defense,
Kiki Vandewghe put up 26 on 60% from 1983-89.
Glenn Robinson might be the worst 20 per 36 scorer ever. Did you know he put up 30/10 in college? And only signed one contract in his entire career and was a big reason we have the rookie scale today?
Interesting sidenote,
Jamaal Wilkes over his seven years averaged 20/6/3. His replacement in the Lakers lineup (
Worthy) averaged about 20/6/3 over the next seven years.
Jerry, a Final Word?Player | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
Carmelo Anthony(2004-11) | 24.5 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 1.11 | 0.45 | .544 | 107 | 20.2 | 7.7 | 5.0 | 2.8 | .125 |
Benard King (1981-88) | 24.6 | 5.7 | 3.2 | 1.05 | 0.27 | .592 | 113 | 20.5 | 6.8 | 4.9 | 1.9 | .153 |
Mark Aguirre (1983-89) | 26.4 | 6.1 | 4.1 | 0.95 | 0.41 | .550 | 110 | 21.1 | 6.7 | 5.1 | 1.6 | .128 |