by benji on Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:53 pm
To be fair, he probably went in looking at the rest of the market and how he could have got what he wanted, but Atlanta who really wanted him dropped a load all over Joe Johnson then realized that "shit, we just gave out a ton of cash" and backed off. Dallas made the Chandler deal to dump some other contracts, and Shaq wisely realized he won't get much time in that situation. Remember only a "contender" would ever be interested in Shaq since he's a "piece who puts you over" now instead of his once dictating the league status so teams like Milwaukee who already have a big guy are definitely not interested, and Shaq doesn't seem like the guy to sign up to man the middle for something like a 35 win Sixers team.
It's more of a circumstance than his actual value plummeting. So I think he's recognized that and realized that since the market got sewn up with shitty contracts, he can either sign with a team for money that's terrible like say the Clippers, or he can take less and try to contribute for a title. Shaq didn't get traded without his consent really, he allowed the trades to Miami, Phoenix and Cleveland because he thought he could help put them over the top. Notice that as he's lessened as an impact he's been traded to higher quality teams with each deal. If he's looking at Boston, it's because he knows he can come off the bench behind Perkins and even Jermaine O'Neal, play himself into shape during the season, have two great games in the playoffs and get talked about all over again if the team of veterans beats Miami, Orlando and the Lakers.
If the Cavaliers had won the title this year, and Shaq had two or three 20/10 games in the playoffs, the media would written a ton of stories about how Shaq sacrificed to LeBron, stepped it up when his team needed, provided champion leadership and blah blah blah.
Hell, he could take half the season off and Boston would still enjoy him being there to check Dwight Howard for 10-15 minutes a game in the playoffs. Like the Pistons did with Elden Campbell in 2004.
It also plays well for those "narrative" people. Assembling a team with all the best players of 2004 to take on the superteam in Miami and whatever the Chris Paul situation might result in. They did something similar last year (Sheed, Finley, Daniels) and came up a few different minutes short of a title.
The Tony Allen thing is going to hurt them though.
As a side note regarding his "legacy" I think denying Shaq a spot in the top five is really doing his career a disservice. No player has dominated the league and a position like Shaq except Jordan, Wilt had that pathological fear of being too dominating (he was afraid of hurting people while dunking ffs), and Kareem imploded during the late-1970s. (And Mikan played in an era I could have played in skill-wise. Although not being stabbed by fans through the metal gate wise.) In their primes, the last thing anyone wanted was to face a pissed-off Shaq or a pissed-off Jordan. Yeah, yeah, yeah, Shaq wasted half of his career playing himself into shape every season, but look at what he did doing that would you really have wanted him completely toned, fully athletic and healthy, and committed every season? At least Jordan gave the impression that a team with a great center could potentially beat the Bulls. A properly conditioned Shaq?