Smacking George W. Bush

[Tuomas]

Press Conference
X-Ray of Bush
Bombing Saddam

[Dramacydal]

bomb,bo-bom-bo, bomb, bomb

great, gave me the best laugh of the day , oh and everthing against this moron is well appreciated

[PoliceLineDoNotCross]

bomb,bo-bom-bo, bomb, bomb

great, gave me the best laugh of the day , oh and everthing against this moron is well appreciated

its funny you should call him a moron. since he is in my book of morons volume 2. it features a bunch of morons and i will post it on the web soon.

[GloveGuy]

It's hilarious how if you type in "Miserable Failure" on Google, then click "I'm Feeling Lucky" you get George Bush's website on whitehouse.gov.

[Andrew]

A friend bought me a George W. "Bushisms" calendar for Christmas, with a hilarious George W. quote every day. The quote for January 22nd is the best of the year so far, and having flipped through the entire calendar it's also one of the best they've used:

"Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?"
- George W. Bush speaking in Florence, South Carolina; January 11, 2000

[benji]

It's hilarious how if you type in "Miserable Failure" on Google, then click "I'm Feeling Lucky" you get George Bush's website on whitehouse.gov.

If someone had some free time, they should register a bunch of free sites and link to the NLSC using the word "pr0n" as the link. Then if you Googled for "pr0n" you'd get the NLSC first.

everthing against this moron is well appreciated

its funny you should call him a moron. since he is in my book of morons volume 2. it features a bunch of morons and i will post it on the web soon.

You can disagree with his policies (his domestic policy anyway), and you can chuckle at his public speaking fumbles, but to call him a moron is (dare I say it?) only something a moron would say.

He received a bachelor's degree from Yale University in 1968 ... President Bush received a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School in 1975.

I'd like to see you fellers grab a degree from Yale and a MBA from Harvard, since you're obviously so much smarter than George W. Bush.

Do you guys find Martin Sheen to be smarter than Bush? I mean he called Bush a moron long before you did. Who wouldn't want to be an intellectual bedfellow with a high skewl dropout who dresses up and pretends to be the President instead of someone with a degree from Yale and a MBA from Harvard who's surrounded himself by a crack staff of experts?

Also, I hope you guys know that this photo (http://huumori.tuomo.net/kuvat/bush2.jpg, the first one in Finnboy's post) is doctored.

[GloveGuy]

As a liberal Democrat, I'm not fond of George Bush. I'm in favor of Kerry, who I feel is the most prepared to be president over the rest of the Dems (Plus I live in the Bay State). But anyways...

I do see why Bush is so popular. White suburbia loves him. When they watch him on T.V., hear a famous Bushism they laugh then say, "This guy is hilarious. I love him! He's my favorite." When I hear him talk, I just shake my head and say, "This is embarassing."

When George Bush ran for president, people liked him because he had those nexdoor neighbor-like mannerisms. But the way I see it, in the past four years, he's the neighbor who has a watchdog on his porch, preventing people to tresspass on his lawn, and though he probably holds Super Bowl parties, he'll make people go out in the freezing cold, miss the game, and head down to the convenient store, just because the house is low on alcohol(alcohol is oil if you didn't understand my metaphor).

[benji]

As a liberal Democrat, I'm not fond of George Bush. I'm in favor of Kerry, who I feel is the most prepared to be president over the rest of the Dems (Plus I live in the Bay State). But anyways...

Lieberman is the only one prepared to be President. With Edwards running behind him. I bet you like Teddy too.

People like Bush because he's just like them. The American people cannot relate to the Lefties.

But the way I see it, in the past four years, he's the neighbor who has a watchdog on his porch, preventing people to tresspass on his lawn, and though he probably holds Super Bowl parties, he'll make people go out in the freezing cold, miss the game, and head down to the convenient store, just because the house is low on alcohol(alcohol is oil if you didn't understand my metaphor).

That was a horrible metaphor. As everyone should know we barely imported any oil from Iraq and we got by just fine, the only reason we imported any was because we were harassed for not particpating in Oil for Palaces. Meanwhile, France and Russia worked deals with Saddam for oil contracts so they pushed for the removal of sanctions so they could get these delicious profits from their buddy Saddam. Yet nobody ever complains about them doing that and doing everything they could think of to keep Saddam around...but when we remove a murderous dictator it's suddenly "all about the oil."

Anymore, I think the only explanations for hating George W. Bush are you either: A) Lost in 2000 or B) Don't understand/Do support the Atheofascist threat

Of course, I'm sticking to foreign policy here...that's what people know, seeing as most people don't even know his domestic agenda...

[GloveGuy]

but when we remove a murderous dictator it's suddenly "all about the oil."

So was it for the WMD that Iraq doesn't have? Or Saddam's involvement in 9/11 that was a false suspicion? That's what we've been told this War has been for. Lies...

[benji]

Saddam's Iraq had WMD. Saddam was involved in terrorism. Neither of those are lies.

[GloveGuy]

Well how come we haven't even found them? If they were there then where have they gone? Please, Kaddafi has (though he's just disarmed them) WMD but you don't see us going to war with him.

George Bush has told us that the main two reasons for this war are:

1) Saddam has WMD

2) Saddam was involved in 9/11

Saddam might have been involved in terrorism, but tell me how he had anything to do with 9/11 exactly.

[benji]

Well, we bombed Libya before and they backed off from our attention after the Gulf War. Of course, we didn't know how advanced their program was either, which does not bode well.

We did find WMD (as if Saddam's $$$ wasn't enough), go look at David Kay's report.

The Bush Administration initally gave us three reasons:
1. Saddam had not disarmed and followed the UN Resolutions
2. Saddam supported terrorism
3. Saddam was a bad mofo

NEVER did the Bush Adminstration say Saddam was involved in 9/11.

All of those are valid reasons to take out his regime. Especially since we were in a legal declared, not just undeclared state of war since 1991 thanks to Saddam firing on planes. It was required by the United Nations charter that we act and enforce the 17 resolutions.

But forget all that. We shouldn't have gone in right? We should've left Saddam in power right?

[arguy337]

no... we did not find WMDs.

There's one thing i never understood. When we went ahead and bombed the fuck out of afghanistan and iraq, we killed thousands and thousands of people (6000 civilians in Iraq - twice more than the ~3000 killed in the september 11 attacks). When we attack them its ok, but when they attack us it terrorism?
What right does Bush have to tell Iraq to disarm their 'WMDs' when the USA is the biggest holder of them?
I'm in no way supporting terrorism or Saddam, but if we're going out to kill terrorists, we sure as hell don't want to look like ones our self.
Back to the matter with Bush: He has no idea what he's doing. During his years as president the economy went down the drain, americans lost millions, he gave a nice tax cut to the richest 1%, he practically ruined what our country was based on with his PATRIOT act, and he made our foreign affairs go down the drain. I could really go on and on, but I wont because i acknowledge the fact that he did have to be president through some of the toughest times.

If you want to read up on this, i recommend reading "Stupid white men..." and "Dude, where's my country?" by Michael Moore.

[benji]

If you want to read up on this, i recommend reading "Stupid white men..." and "Dude, where's my country?" by Michael Moore.

Mmmmm...lies and a lying liar that tells them...

no... we did not find WMDs.

Go read David Kay's report silly. Also, the Iraqi Air Force buried their planes in the desert and if it wasn't for some lucky winds we would've never known they were there. Now considering they buried their Air Force, think about what they could do with WMDs.

There's one thing i never understood. When we went ahead and bombed the fuck out of afghanistan and iraq, we killed thousands and thousands of people (6000 civilians in Iraq - twice more than the ~3000 killed in the september 11 attacks). When we attack them its ok, but when they attack us it terrorism?

A terrorist act has the aim to murder civilians. Our military did not aim to murder civilians and led the most humantarian wars in world history.

What right does Bush have to tell Iraq to disarm their 'WMDs' when the USA is the biggest holder of them?

The United Nations told them to disarm. Saddam signed an agreement to disarm to stay in power.

I'm in no way supporting terrorism or Saddam, but if we're going out to kill terrorists, we sure as hell don't want to look like ones our self.

We don't.

Back to the matter with Bush: He has no idea what he's doing. During his years as president the economy went down the drain

The recession started in late 1999 silly.

he gave a nice tax cut to the richest 1%

The two tax cuts were for everyone silly. They were also actually more weighted to the lower end than the higher end.

he practically ruined what our country was based on with his PATRIOT act

There's some keys here:
1. The Congress voted for the Patriot Act, and Bush signed it, making it a valid expansion of the criminal justice system.
2. The Patriot Act expires.
3. The Patriot Act does not erode civil liberties unless you're a terrorist. If you aren't doing anything wrong you don't have any reason to fear the Patriot Act just like you don't have any reason to fear any other laws.

and he made our foreign affairs go down the drain

Removing two terror-supporting dictatorships, finding out who our true friends are, getting Pakistan on board, getting North Korea to the table, getting Libya to give up it's WMDs, enforcing UN resolutions, dismantling terrorists and forcing them to fight on our terms. Yeah, his foreign policy is a disaster.

[Bru]

David Kay resigned http://www.baltimorefordean.org/democra ... 00252.html

[Jeffx]

You guys are wasting your time arguing with conservatives like Ben. Some folks refuse to take their heads out of the sand.

Unfortunately, I think Dumya will be re-elected because the Democrats are so lame.

[Matthew]

Wow ben likes the word "silly"
But seriously, I agree with him. Everyone was shocked when september 11 happened and alot of people were disgusted to the point where they were sick (not throwing up, but they were affected physically).
Now George Bush is trying to wipe out terroists, and sadaam, which are the same thing really, and people want to complain. I bet if he did nothing, he'd be chastised as well.
WMD or no WMD found... The world is a much better place with sadaam in custurdy and the taliban kept in check imo