DrGonzo wrote:a key lapse of logic in this thread...Since when is the majority correct? 90 countries saying it doesnt make it true.
Well, if you're ascribing that view to me that'd be a lapse of logic. vinceair made a bunch of claims, shadowgrin made counterclaims with sources. vinceair has yet to provide any sources for his conclusions. His only counterargument seems to be that anyone who disagrees with him is paid off by BIG SWEETNER.
Especially since the only sources I could find were homeopathy lunatics, people ascribing suddenly paying attention to their diet and health management entirely to cutting out soda, cultural warriors, or people trying to sell me their book who sound a lot like Kevin Trudeau.
In this case the majority are saying "at normal levels, aspartame is fine, but you're it injecting it in massive doses daily you might have a problem" and the minority says "THEY'RE LIARS PAID OFF BY BIG SWEETNER AND WANT TO KILL US WITH POISONS! AND I CAN PROVE IT BY MAKING MORE CLAIMS!" That could be true, but that doesn't refute what they're saying just impugns their motives.
Aspartame being 'safe' (in small doses) also doesnt mean its healthy..it just means it won't make your body crap out on you after 1 dosage.
Nobody said it was healthy. But, what's the dosage where the presence of aspartame becomes toxic and destabilizing? Nobody seems to have the answer.
Also: over long term use aspartame can build up toxicity in your body.
I don't think you can "build up toxicity" but again, where's the sources?
A major problem is that you'd need a longitudinal survey, not a measure at death's door and asking how much aspartame they've consumed. Or the studies they've done now where they ask people how much they consume in one year, then track five years if they get cancer. None of that's causation, just correlation. You'd need to isolate control groups of equivalent base risk and then study them over their entire lives with different aspartame consumption but everything else exactly the same. And since humans aren't the same, and money is finite, this kind of information is difficult to acquire. Plus it's only been around since the 70s, and it's not like health has gotten worse since 1973 even though I bet aspartame consumption has grown exponentially.
Nothing in any soda is healthy.
Water? Although I guess that doesn't count, since too much water will kill you quickly.
We spend too much time trying to discover elaborate and complex bogeymen instead of being rational and following common sense. The dangers of aspartame are not "toxins" or "poison" but are the same as any sugar or other substance abuse, it conditions your body to accepting that level, gradually increasing tolerance and/or requiring more consumption eventually destabilizing your diet/life.
In most cases where soda consumption would correlate with negative effects, I suspect you wouldn't have a hard time finding at least ten other health management problems with that person outside of soda consumption. It allows people to abrogate responsibility due to the "health bogeyman of the week" which changes or goes away in a few months when there's a new one THAT IS KILLING US ALL.