Lamrock wrote:A great steal? He's an undersized inefficient chucker. Sure, he's talented offensively, but he is inefficient, has no playmaking abilities and is a defensive liability. I like the idea of having him come off the bench for the MLE, but not as a first option on offense with a star contract.
Like the Charlie V signing though. What a bargain.
Lamrock wrote:A great steal? He's an undersized inefficient chucker. Sure, he's talented offensively, but he is inefficient,
ill understand if these 2 threads are kept separate
Lamrock wrote:Okay, I'll admit it, looking at the stats, he's not inefficient. I was basing my logic on his mediocre 2007-08 season. However, Detroit is still spending 11 million a year on a gadget player who is a defensive liability and seems to already have reached his ceiling. When you spend that much on a player who is at best a fringe all-star, it makes you wonder whether they are trying to build a contender, or just a slightly above average playoff team, like the Hawks.
Ben Gordon's PER is 17, and a couple years ago had a season where it was 18.2, so benji will probably support this signing to an extent. Its not that I think Gordon is a bad player, I just don't think he's a steal like Brave Sir Rubin said.
Should have remembered there was a member on this forum named air gordon on this board when I made that post...
Lamrock wrote:Okay, I'll admit it, looking at the stats, he's not inefficient. I was basing my logic on his mediocre 2007-08 season. However, Detroit is still spending 11 million a year on a gadget player who is a defensive liability and seems to already have reached his ceiling. When you spend that much on a player who is at best a fringe all-star, it makes you wonder whether they are trying to build a contender, or just a slightly above average playoff team, like the Hawks.
Ben Gordon's PER is 17, and a couple years ago had a season where it was 18.2, so benji will probably support this signing to an extent. Its not that I think Gordon is a bad player, I just don't think he's a steal like Brave Sir Rubin said.
Should have remembered there was a member on this forum named air gordon on this board when I made that post...
Brave Sir Rubin wrote:Lamrock wrote:Thats not true.
That's improper grammar.
Modifly wrote:Time for Andrew to finally change his avatar. I cant wait to see how he respond to this.
I now have the reason to watch Detroit Pistons games next season, cant wait to see how Gordon and Villanueva fits in. The biggest question right now is how they'll organise their rotation and playing time. What happens to Rip? I think they'll start Stuckey at PG but Rip and Gordon both play the same position and I dont think Rip will shift over to SF, so will one of them come off from the bench? If that's the case look for that player to be Gordon because he has a good reputation as a sixth man.
That makes it completely different than Iverson coming here ... Gordon is choosing to come here and play the super sub role.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests