gangsta4life wrote:Lebron's Best Chance of winning a championship at this stage lies with the Cavaliers.
Seriously? A lot of users seem to agree with you but I don't get it. Not that they suck that bad but take LeBron out of the picture and what would be left? How many games would they win you think? Make it to the playoffs? I doubt it, maybe.
My point being that LeBron can make any decent team a contender (let's say .500).
A decent point guard, two big guys that can defend & rebound plus an outside shooter and you have your supporting cast.
Just imagine any mediocre - just didn't make it to the playoffs - team, add LeBron and assess how far they could go.
Especially works great for teams that are weak at the SF position.
I'd love to see him play in the Chicago line-up with Derrick Rose and a few young guys up front like the ones they have.
I have no idea if they can pay him but I think it would be a great fit and two young players you can build on with great competitive personalities. Seems to me they have a better 'supporting cast' if you will than Cleveland.
There are probably more teams like that, young fresh that could make a real shout if they had LeBron James.
A lot of people would not follow the cavs anymore if Lebron wasn't there.
Yes because they would be mediocre at best.
(I'm talking last year's team obviously, no Shaq.)
vinceair wrote:James may never win the ring.That would be bizarre
You know he's only 24 right?