Fri May 08, 2009 11:47 am
shadowgrin wrote:Oakrhum wrote:What's unintelligent with that? That's the time when the people are really drawn in and all eyes are in their TV sets. If they placed the ad right before the round, chances are people are not yet watching. People go to pee or do whatever it is during commercial breaks so if they place it in between the actual show, there's no escape. We'll see the ad whether we like it or not. But I understand you, I think you're just annoyed and can't find the right word to say and the coolest word to say for you is the word "stupid", pretty much like Manny Pacquiao's "you know and I mean" when he's lost for words.
From a short term marketing standpoint it may not be stupid, but in the long term it's still stupid, market-wise, because the airtime of commercials actually exceeded the set standard, but since the broadcasting station isn't under the jurisdiction of that particular goverment agency which handles such things, it got off the hook. It now has potential to be barraged with legislation, bad news for adverts, if it does happen. What we just all need, more legislation.
Stupid, because it's a move which can piss off potential consumers.
Stupid because it's sets a precedent which may be followed by other broadcasters/stations . (see related first paragraph)
Stupid because the sponsors and broadcaster didn't have the insight to plan the airtimes just in case that the fight might be short or not last past three rounds (which is the accepted norm for a short fight). The number and length of commercials could have made a 12 round fight seem like 24 rounds.
Stupid because I was already sick and tired of the cut-away long commercials during the singing of the national anthems and the entrance of fighters. Tom Jones' rendition of God Save The Queen wasn't even shown, it would be understandable if the singing of the Star Spangled Banner wasn't shown also as some sort of support to Pacquiao or nationalism but only the God Save the Queen was left out. Does the singer of God Save the Queen have to be part Filipino as well just to for it to be shown, like that with the U.S. national anthem? What's up with that? So much for respecting other culture.![]()
I hope you understand what I'm trying to say, "you know what I mean?"
Fri May 08, 2009 12:01 pm
Fri May 08, 2009 12:06 pm
Fri May 08, 2009 1:13 pm
Oakrhum wrote:And I wonder why we’re not talking boxing here. I thought that we’re under sports thread.
Fri May 08, 2009 3:40 pm
Fri May 08, 2009 9:15 pm
Sat May 09, 2009 6:03 am
Sun May 10, 2009 5:01 am
Oakrhum wrote:The only thing I would remember if I'm a consumer is that I saw it in Manny's fight, I saw that ad when Manny won the fight, I won't be pissed by that. It's not like, "I won't buy that product because I saw it so many times during the boxing fight that I saw last Sunday morning.
Oakrhum wrote:All the airings of those commercials depend on the contract that they agreed upon
shadowgrin wrote:...the airtime of commercials actually exceeded the set standard, but since the broadcasting station isn't under the jurisdiction of that particular goverment agency which handles such things, it got off the hook. It now has potential to be barraged with legislation, bad news for adverts, if it does happen. What we just all need, more legislation.
Stupid because it's sets a precedent which may be followed by other broadcasters/stations . (see related first paragraph)
Stupid because the sponsors and broadcaster didn't have the insight to plan the airtimes just in case that the fight might be short or not last past three rounds (which is the accepted norm for a short fight). The number and length of commercials could have made a 12 round fight seem like 24 rounds.
Oakrhum wrote:You hate it,
you don’t like it that’s why you call it stupid. That's what you mean.
Oakrhum wrote:And this long commercial breaks has been the case ever since before, Tyson fights...Penalosa, Espinosa fights that
I’m pretty much sure that you do not know care about before because it’s not as talked about as what Manny Pacquiao is right now.
Oakrhum wrote:I wonder how more aggravated you are right now if the other national anthems were shown during the fight.
Oakrhum wrote:Anyway, I have a gift for you and I know you'll like this and you can get along well with the writer.
http://www.oddjack.com/2009/can-an-abor ... -04-28.php
Oakrhum wrote:And I wonder why we’re not talking boxing here. I thought that we’re under sports thread. Why don’t you guys talk about the left hook of Manny or his next fight? That would be more interesting rather than talking about some old-fashioned and clichéd stuff that millions of kids are talking about. Don’t know anything about boxing?
Sun May 10, 2009 12:53 pm
Sun May 10, 2009 3:21 pm
Sun May 10, 2009 5:34 pm
Sun May 10, 2009 6:09 pm
Sun May 10, 2009 7:17 pm
Oakrhum wrote:so even without any promotion it will get our concern..something that boxing idiots does not know..
Sun May 10, 2009 7:36 pm
Null17 wrote:He fists represent Jose RIzal and Andres Bonifacio!
Sun May 10, 2009 7:41 pm
Null17 wrote:...He shows the world what the Philippines is about!!!!!~11111eleven
Sun May 10, 2009 9:32 pm
shadowgrin wrote:Null17 wrote:He fists represent Jose RIzal and Andres Bonifacio!
Now that's a new one.
Mon May 11, 2009 4:14 pm
Tue May 12, 2009 10:53 am
Tue May 12, 2009 8:04 pm
Thu May 14, 2009 1:26 am