I think I just spoiled the others' viewing pleasure.

Even if I was putting aside all the historical aberrations and the fact that it's another insidious attempt for Hollywood to assimilate good and evil to particular races and ethnicities, even if it was complete and absolute fiction, this movie would still suck balls.
It wasn't based on history, it's mostly based on Frank Miller's graphic novel e.g. from a comic book. That's why it has "cheesy lines and gratitous gore".
I they wanted to make something historically(sp?) accurate, they would have made a documentary. This is a movie that's supposed to be cool, and that's it. There's no need for in-depth analysis like those links you posted.
I know the comic is loosely based on the history, but the film rather follows the fictional story of the comic book so don't be surprised if the film is a "historical aberration".
I'm only giving an opinion about your opinion about a movie.
What's wrong with an exchange of dialogue?
I was expecting to be flamed for thrashing 300
Dean wrote:As much as i love her in that movie, i still get disappointed when i remember how the original role was written as completely naked
Qballer wrote:Dean wrote:As much as i love her in that movie, i still get disappointed when i remember how the original role was written as completely naked
yes, so true. she won't show her body in any movie, which sucks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest