Just a brief little comment about the rookie ratings...I hadn't really looked at them too much till recently when I was playing with them...
I think they are generally a bit overrated....when compared to last season's rookies there are alot more better rated guys that you have added....I realise maybe this latest rookie crop might be a bit deeper, but thats a hard thing to judge at this point.
I looked a teh overall ratings from the 1yr players compared to the 0yr players.....now I know overall is just a number etc etc, but it is a calculated number with the other ratings contributing to it - so it indicates higher ratings.
I listed the number of players from each rookie group (this year = 0yrs; last year = 1yr) that fall into the ranges of overall ratings....Basically it shows there are HEAPS more players from this years rookie group rated 60-69 than last years guys - and especially more in the 65-69 range.
As I said, I realise this years crop may be deeper, but I still think this most recent bunch of rookies are overrated compared to other players in the game....a player rated in the 60s overall can generally be a really solid contributor in hte game - most rookies won't contribute that early.
- Code: Select all
Ov Rating 0yrs 1yr
70+ 3 4
65-69 9 2
60-64 10 7
55-59 8 11