Adidas to buy Reebok

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.

Adidas to buy Reebok

Postby iG® on Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:55 am

German sports goods firm Adidas-Salomon says it has struck an agreement to buy US rival Reebok for 3.1bn euros ($3.8bn; £2.1bn).


Rest of the story
User avatar
iG®
 
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:09 am
Location: Serbia, Belgrade

Postby Jing on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:17 am

o_0
well, that is interesting. and i just bought some reebok shoes.
User avatar
Jing
 
Posts: 9791
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 9:29 am
Location: College

Postby cyanide on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:19 am

The takeover still needs to be approved by Reebok shareholders and competition authorities. If cleared, the deal should be completed in early 2006.


If that deal goes through, that'll be one hell of a merger. Reebok appeared to be declining with less ads and popularity, imo, but I have no idea if they were losing profit internationally, though.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby J@3 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:21 am

abok or reedidas?
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby cyanide on Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:26 am

Probably one of the combinations of Adidas-Salomon-Reebok. Personally, I like Adeedok.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby Blue Nugget on Thu Aug 04, 2005 4:08 am

Wow,nice two sucky brands merge into one weak ass brand.
Image
User avatar
Blue Nugget
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:09 am

Postby J@3 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 4:10 am

Nike should merge with the Salvation Army and appoint them head shoe designer. At least then they'd have an excuse for their new shoes looking so shit.
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Big-D on Thu Aug 04, 2005 5:47 am

Jae wrote:Nike should merge with the Salvation Army and appoint them head shoe designer. At least then they'd have an excuse for their new shoes looking so shit.


omg i almost pissed my pants that was so funny.
you rock man.

imo adidas is the best brand because of there quality, looks and feel.nike on the other hand have good looks,not comfortable, and fall apart easy. i know from experience because i buy lots of shoes. the only reason why adidas is buying shitty reebok is because the sell to a larger market of poorer people. they arent changing the names i dont think but it will give adidas more money.
Image
User avatar
Big-D
 
Posts: 1939
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:16 pm

Postby Jackal on Thu Aug 04, 2005 5:58 am

On the contrary, Adidas just bought up a piece of the shoe market. It was a good move for them marketwise, they broadend their horizons whereas Nike is stuck right where it was on the European market.

It's quite simple in fact.

Nike dominates the US market. Adidas was there, but not as dominant. Reebok was a minor player amongst these two.

Adidas dominates the European market. Nike is there, but not as dominant albeit they are trying by sponsoring a lot of soccer clubs. Reebok was non exsistant.

By buying up Reebok, they've taken a part of the NBA's market. This way they got a bit ahead of Nike.

Expect a move from Nike in the near future.
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby cklitsie on Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:24 am

nike has a pretty big part of the european market too, they may not sponsor as much soccer teams, but look at the casual shoes.
i dont think adidas+reebok sells more than nike does with the air force 1's, shox, dunks and converses
and when i look at bball shoes, nike is more dominant too in europe but and1 rules the market with all the wanksters around here.
User avatar
cklitsie
 
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 3:02 am

Postby Andreas Dahl on Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:39 am

Very interesting deal. Sort of like a bigger, better counter-move after Nike bought Converse.
By the way, Reebok will still be Reebok for years to come; they'll just operate under the watchful eye of Adidas (just like Converse and Nike).
Image
User avatar
Andreas Dahl
 
Posts: 5970
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Växjö, Sweden

Postby J@3 on Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:08 am

I don't understand how Nike still has such a strangehold on the shoe market. Their products have been below sub standard for a while now. For some reason putting something that looks like a kitchen curtain from the 1950's on a strap across the middle of the shoe is "fashionable". It's rubbish, bring back the 90's (N)
User avatar
J@3
 
Posts: 19815
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 3:25 pm
Location: MLB

Postby Andreas Dahl on Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:17 am

Well having the top performing athletic shoes on the market works wonders (even if their overpriced).
Also that they have most of the retro market in a tight grip isn't too shabby.
Image
User avatar
Andreas Dahl
 
Posts: 5970
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Växjö, Sweden

Postby Mentally Hilarious on Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:18 am

Jae wrote:I don't understand how Nike still has such a strangehold on the shoe market. Their products have been below sub standard for a while now. For some reason putting something that looks like a kitchen curtain from the 1950's on a strap across the middle of the shoe is "fashionable". It's rubbish, bring back the 90's (N)


But LeBron is signed for them! And he can jump rrreally high! That makes them great.

I hate it when companies endorse sub-standard products using athletes and morons buy it. Yuk.
Image
User avatar
Mentally Hilarious
 
Posts: 1045
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 6:07 am

Postby Jay-Peso on Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:24 am

I liked Adidas but I hate Reebok everything. It seems it's made even more cheap than Nike!!! (N)

I like Nike and Adidas but like Jackal said, expect a move from Nike in the near future because this is a big move for Adidas.
Image
What you know bout that?
User avatar
Jay-Peso
 
Posts: 1704
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 7:46 am
Location: United States

Postby Big-D on Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:10 am

Andreas Dahl wrote:Very interesting deal. Sort of like a bigger, better counter-move after Nike bought Converse.
By the way, Reebok will still be Reebok for years to come; they'll just operate under the watchful eye of Adidas (just like Converse and Nike).


i think they got starter too.imo the only good shoes that come out of nike are jordans.
Image
User avatar
Big-D
 
Posts: 1939
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:16 pm

Postby Jackal on Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:16 am

nike has a pretty big part of the european market too, they may not sponsor as much soccer teams, but look at the casual shoes.
i dont think adidas+reebok sells more than nike does with the air force 1's, shox, dunks and converses
and when i look at bball shoes, nike is more dominant too in europe but and1 rules the market with all the wanksters around here.

Only recently have the soccer players been wearing Nike. It was Adidas all the way before that. It was on the news today, you might've picked it up at 6 or 8, if you watch the news that is.

They used Germany vs Holland as examples. :lol:
User avatar
Jackal
 
Posts: 14877
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 2:59 am

Postby FendeR` on Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:19 am

Nike has their share of shoes that look like a pile of vomit, but they still have some pretty sick-looking shoes (I've had my eye on the Shox Bombers even though they're so expensive). And they always have creative ads with premiere athletes to star in them. I don't care what you say, LeBron's shoes look very appealing to buyr when you see LeBron in them dunking left and right in a commerical. And people are always going to buy Jordans.

And does anyone know who created "And1"? A couple of really white guys from Pennsylvania.
FendeR` - Captain
Image
User avatar
FendeR`
 
Posts: 1763
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 2:50 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Jona on Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:30 am

FendeR` wrote:And does anyone know who created "And1"? A couple of really white guys from Pennsylvania.


LOL is that so?
How did it become so popular?? :?:
Jona - Rush Fan
Image
User avatar
Jona
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:41 am
Location: Santiago, Chile

Postby The GOAT on Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:33 am

Skip to my lou
Image

There is no truth. There is only you and what you make the truth.
The GOAT
 
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:06 am
Location: Long Island, New York

Postby cyanide on Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:20 am

Jona wrote:
FendeR` wrote:And does anyone know who created "And1"? A couple of really white guys from Pennsylvania.


LOL is that so?
How did it become so popular?? :?:


My last three shoes have been AND1, mainly because of the price and looks. It looks way better than the Nikes these days, and cheaper, too. I think the AND1 Mix Tapes have a lot to do with their popularity, as well.
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby Bang on Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:25 am

AND1 is a division of Nike though. Just like Converse is a division of Nike. So Reebok will probably still stay as Reebok.
Bored.
User avatar
Bang
 
Posts: 1312
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 11:16 pm

Postby cyanide on Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:39 am

bangyounh wrote:AND1 is a division of Nike though


^ Whoa, didn't know that! :shock:
if you were killed tomorrow, i WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN THE MOTHA FUCKER THAT KILLED U!
......|..___________________, ,
....../ `---______----|]
...../==o;;;;;;;;______.:/
.....), ---.(_(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//
WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
User avatar
cyanide
Dat steatopygous
 
Posts: 9197
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 6:09 am
Location: US's toque

Postby FendeR` on Thu Aug 04, 2005 1:39 pm

Jona wrote:
FendeR` wrote:And does anyone know who created "And1"? A couple of really white guys from Pennsylvania.


LOL is that so?
How did it become so popular?? :?:


Because I just got a pair of pretty nice looking And1's for $30 bucks. Damn.
FendeR` - Captain
Image
User avatar
FendeR`
 
Posts: 1763
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 2:50 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Old School Fool on Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:59 pm

The Answer, with Adidas Stripes? :lol:
Image
User avatar
Old School Fool
 
Posts: 2399
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 7:32 pm
Location: California

Next

Return to Off-Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests