Thought about this while watching the Knicks/Lakers game. Jordan Hill has been listed as a bust in some stupid NBA articles, and is also seen as one by most members here. I don't think he deserves such a bad rap. He's only played 132 minutes in 14 games, but his PER is over 18, and he's shooting 56%. Perhaps the sample size is too small, but I think J-Hill wasn't all that bad of a pick. (especially after the Grizzlies took Trasheem Thabust over Tyreke)
Agreed, he's looking pretty good against the Lakers. I guess there was bit of a knee-jerk reaction with Brandon Jennings dropping 55 and looking like he should've gone higher and Hill wasn't cracking D'Antoni's rotation, making him seem like a wasted pick.
I hate PER. Anyway Hill's alright, even though he's playing limited minutes he's probably doing more for them than Brandon Jennings is for the Bucks jacking up 20 shots and hitting 5 every second night.
God damn my stats from November killing me every other night. (Though to be fair, he plays 10 MPG, which is a small sample size against generally shoddy garbage time opposition)
I think it's way too early to tell if he's a bust or not. We'll have to see whether he becomes a solid contributer for the Knicks over the next few years. Andrew Bogut was taken before Chris Paul and Deron Williams, but I don't think he's a bust because he's arguably the best player on the Bucks side and in the top 10 in the league as far as centres are concerned (in my opinion). If anyone's going to be a bust in this draft, it's going to be Hasheem Thabeet.
I wouldn't call Bogut a bust simply because Paul and a couple of others would go before him if that draft were held again today. If they were to hold that draft again he'd probably still go top five.
I guess the argument I tried to make with Bogut was he was taken before two big franchise players. If people label Jordan Hill a bust because he was taken before Brandon Jennings, I just think that's a bit weak.