Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Like real basketball, as well as basketball video games? Talk about the NBA, NCAA, and other professional and amateur basketball leagues here.
Post a reply

Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:46 pm

just_decent wrote:only one problem... cablevision and the fans don't want future, they want playoffs now.... and they give up numerous picks to build for the future thanks to bonehead trades by thomas....


You're right about Dolan and his idiot flunkies at Cablevision, but real fans don't mind several losing seasons as long as the team is heading in the right direction. I see no point in making the playoffs with a sub-.500 record and getting bumped in the first round. I'd rather build the Knicks into a 45-50 win team first.

That short-sighted "playoffs at all cost" attitude(over the past 30 years) is why this franchise is in deep sh!t now. If the Knicks had blown the team up after 2001, we'd be further along. Isiah's moves made things worse.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:57 pm

NY is the basketball mecca, and it's been a while since the Knicks have had a team that got out of the first round of the playoffs.


Isn't Indiana basketball's mecca? :?:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:29 pm

D, if that girl in your avatar is your wife, you're teh coolest guy on the face of the Earth.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:31 pm

D-Weaver wrote:
NY is the basketball mecca, and it's been a while since the Knicks have had a team that got out of the first round of the playoffs.


Isn't Indiana basketball's mecca? :?:


Its not even close. New York is an absolute breeding ground for basketball. Do you know where Michael Jordan was born? New York. Case closed.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:35 pm

D-Weaver wrote:Isn't Indiana basketball's mecca? :?:


Hoosiers?

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:40 pm

D, if that girl in your avatar is your wife, you're teh coolest guy on the face of the Earth.


Check my dynasty thread and you'll have your answer. Plus, there's a bigger photo. :wink:


Do you know where Michael Jordan was born? New York. Case closed.


So , I'm guessing hockey's mecca is Brantford, Ontario,

and baseball's mecca is Baltimore, Maryland, right? :lol:


Hoosiers?


Exactly. Tradition, if nothing else.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:47 pm

if that's your wife, i'd bone :P

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:48 pm

Matt wrote:if that's your wife, i'd bone :P


Again, it's all in the dynasty thread. ( Cool, I find a good way of self-promoting, hehe)

Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:42 pm

I have a feeling I may have to move me and my "Mr. Potato Head"-head to Greece as well.. :mrgreen:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:49 pm

When your wife is kidnapped and murdered by some 14 year old Pinoy who saw her picture at the NLSC, don't come crying to us.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:00 pm

cklitsie wrote:I have a feeling I may have to move me and my "Mr. Potato Head"-head to Greece as well.. :mrgreen:



You're always welcome... :D


Joe wrote:When your wife is kidnapped and murdered by some 14 year old Pinoy who saw her picture at the NLSC, don't come crying to us.



that breed is rare in Eastern/Southern Europe. :wink: And I definitely will not come crying to you. :lol:

Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:44 am

Jae wrote:When your wife is kidnapped and murdered by some 14 year old Pinoy who saw her picture at the NLSC, don't come crying to us.
I'd suspect VanK before anyone else, he hasn't stopped talking about her..

Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:54 am

cklitsie wrote:
Jae wrote:When your wife is kidnapped and murdered by some 14 year old Pinoy who saw her picture at the NLSC, don't come crying to us.
I'd suspect VanK before anyone else, he hasn't stopped talking about her..


I'm not sure whether that's his stalking tendancies shining through or his Dweaver infatuation expanding.

Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:52 am

I'd suspect VanK before anyone else, he hasn't stopped talking about her..


We're going to adopt him, so he's going to have to call her mom from now on.


I'm not sure whether that's his stalking tendancies shining through or his Dweaver infatuation expanding.


great, I'm gathering a posse. :D



Now, this has been fun, but I don't thibk our beloved NYK fans would appreciate Joanne taking over their thread. So... :arrow:

Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:39 pm

just_decent wrote:
Jeffx wrote:
John WB wrote:After 6 straight wins, Knicks have flat out sucked. There's no way around it. What's happened?

And trade Crawford, please. His crappy decision making really shined through today without Marbury there covering it up.



John, it's like Bill Parcells said - "You are what your record says you are". The Knicks just aren't that good. You have to wait until Brown gets better players - guys that play his style of ball. To me, it's about the future.


only one problem... cablevision and the fans don't want future, they want playoffs now....

Well, what they're doing obviously isn't working and we're not even making the playoffs now. Our team is bad as a rebuilding team, might as well rebuild.

Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:37 pm

I mentioned his wife three times, so I don't beliveve that grounds will hold it's own on court. Although adoption would is still a very desirable option.

I don't know if I'm comfortable with me being part of dweaver's posse, though. But what the hell, if Korver has it, why shouldn't a weird Greek who has a hot, rich wife (that's the last time I mention her). Stranger things have happened before.

Sun Jan 22, 2006 6:26 pm

wow so after 6 game winning streak, knicks lose 5 in a row and show no signs of stoppng the bleeding (N)
back to bash isiah mode we go lol

The knicks better turn things around soon or else there will be no chance of any late season push working like the warriors did last year. We need Marbury back.. nate is a foul prone machine foulding out in 17min today..

Fri Jan 27, 2006 1:10 am

Tough loss to a sturggling Kings team.

It's really hard to watch the Knicks again. 6th straight loss.

And it looked like we really turned things around with the 6 wins ina row to start the year. :(

What I really want to know is what the hell was up with the starting line-up last night? Where the hell was David Lee? Did he even play last night? F'n Larry Brown.. Lee goes from starting every game to not even playing one minute.

And the rookies minutes have declined. While Jamal Crawford's been starting and playing even more. And we've been losing. I wonder why that is..

BENCH JAMAL CRAWFORD! START THE 3 ROOKIES!

Or a least 2. Frye off the bench was working.

Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:02 am

yeah

Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:22 am

Damn, you have got to be the best new poster we've ever gotten in the NLSC. Ever.

Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:15 am

John WB wrote:Tough loss to a sturggling Kings team.

It's really hard to watch the Knicks again. 6th straight loss.

And it looked like we really turned things around with the 6 wins ina row to start the year. :(

What I really want to know is what the hell was up with the starting line-up last night? Where the hell was David Lee? Did he even play last night? F'n Larry Brown.. Lee goes from starting every game to not even playing one minute.

And the rookies minutes have declined. While Jamal Crawford's been starting and playing even more. And we've been losing. I wonder why that is..

BENCH JAMAL CRAWFORD! START THE 3 ROOKIES!

Or a least 2. Frye off the bench was working.



Your head will spin trying to figure out Brown's moves. The season's done, so why not play the rooks?

The Knicks have had bad years before, but this year it's painful watching them. I don't think Brown will stick around long enough to get the team out of this mess.

Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:41 am

It's not just that the seasons though , but we were actually winning with the rooks. I would understand all this heartbreak if we would've had a first round pick , but we don't even have that to look to . :cry:

Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:47 pm

To bring in Larry Brown was a realy bad idea, because everybody knew that Brown always liked pass first point guards, who can play "the right way" (or larry's way).

Isiah should have brought in a coach who facilitates Starbury's skills (as a scorer) and build a team around a scoring point guard.

A second scoring option who knows that he actually IS "only" the 2nd scoring option, some defensive minded players (like in the old days of the knicks) and some role players and a scorer of the bench (i don't mind if it's jamal crawford).

Larry Brown tries to change an already developed veteran, who is also the star and the focal point of the team, and Starbury KNOWS THAT, so i don't wonder why it has not really worked out so far.

Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:39 am

I think Starbury's improved a lot. His defense is a lot better and his shot selection is much better. He's done a great job finding open players and creating for his teammates. But to me Jamal Crawford's off-set that all. He has no defense and his shooting is erratic.

Then add to the fact that the rookies haven't been getting minutes as of late and they're some of our best players, then there's a problem.

Malik Rose has played horrible. Jerome James is a turnover machine and hasn't done anything worthwile all year. I'd bench them both, along with Crawford.

Starting 5
C- Eddy Curry
PF- Antonio Davis(Mo Taylor while Davis is out with the suspension)
SF- David Lee
SG- Stephon Marbury
PG- Nate Robinson
Bench:
Channing Frye
Mo Taylor
Quentin Richardson (along with Woods and Ariza, give most of the major bench minutes to whoever's got it going offensively and defensively. Recently he and Woods have been solid.)
Qyntel Woods(has been a good energy guy off the bench. Makes hustle plays and I haven't really seen him do anything negative.)
Trevor Ariza(been struggling lately, but can be an energy/hustle guy.)
Jamal Crawford(play him in spirts. But he has to play defense and if his shot isn't going, bench him. Make sure he's taking it to the basket and nto settling.)

As a rule, the Knicks should make sure none of their players are settling too. And Curry still has to learn how to pass out of the double team instead of just bowling in there.

Brown was playing this line-up before and it was fine. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Lee might not always have a good shooting game, but he gives you the hustle guy who's effect you can't always judge by the box score. Marbury has been our best player. Nate's our best 3-pt shooter and when he's not in foul trouble has been a solid playmaker and he's also a hustle guy.

What happened to Jackie Butler? He hasn't played in a long time. He'd be a better back-up to Curry than James.

Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:13 am

Nate Robinson plays SG.
Post a reply