1. Kobe Bryant / 6-6 / 200Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2003-09 | 26.6 | 5.3 | 4.8 | 1.55 | 0.50 | .563 | 113 | 25.3 | 88.5 | 66.4 | 22.2 | .201 |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIrCFrFpHvw2. Dwyane Wade / 6-4 / 212Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2005-11 | 25.3 | 5.0 | 6.3 | 1.73 | 0.98 | .569 | 112 | 26.5 | 74.5 | 49.1 | 25.4 | .201 |
Wait, Wade has the better numbers.
You're somewhat right. Kobe's the better offensive player, Wade the better defensive one. But they're basically neck and neck during their periods overall. Where Kobe gets his slight edge is that offense matters more for a lousy team. Kobe set the record for usage, but there was a reason he did so.
Wade has a few more years to surpass Kobe, despite LeBron, nothing to fret about. Kobe lived with Shaq and Gasol.
3. Clyde Drexler / 6-7 / 210Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1987-93 | 23.3 | 6.6 | 6.0 | 2.14 | 0.74 | .554 | 116 | 22.4 | 78.8 | 51.5 | 27.3 | .197 |
By a hair. Like everyone from here on down he was never the clear best player on his team but had plenty of great years.
It was his dunking and so on that made people think he was a rival to Jordan, but like everyone else, he truly wasn't. Thus his legacy was inflated out of this need for a rival. Drexler was great, but it's the rest of guards he needs to be compared to. Not Jordan.
4. Manu Ginobili / 6-6 / 210Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2005-11 | 20.8 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 1.86 | 0.46 | .598 | 116 | 22.9 | 64.5 | 39.1 | 25.4 | .227 |
Really? Oh yeah.
You think the Spurs win titles without him?
We can put him higher if you want. He's ideal for the Spurs, delivers 20 points per 36 with boards, assists and defense. He's the last guy here who provides elite offense and defense. Actually, well...
5. Sidney Moncrief / 6-3 / 180Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1980-86 | 19.5 | 5.9 | 4.3 | 1.48 | 0.36 | .593 | 120 | 19.8 | 76.9 | 52.3 | 24.6 | .205 |
Okay, so here we have the last guy who provides above average offense with elite defense. Another ignored 1980s Bucks player by many people. That team is the Rodney Dangerfield of great teams.
Moncrief at least received recognition at the time, winning the first two defensive player of the year awards. And after Jordan might be the best perimeter player to ever win the award. There's a case to be made he's the best backcourt defender of the winners. It's too bad his knees and neck fell apart so early, he didn't really get to playout his true prime making his placement even more respectable.
6. Reggie Miller / 6-7 / 185Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1990-96 | 21.6 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 1.32 | 0.24 | .632 | 124 | 19.9 | 80.1 | 66.9 | 13.2 | .191 |
Alright, so he wasn't aware that you could actually defend the other players until Larry Bird took over two years after his prime. But that ugly shot is one of the best of all time. And to be fair, Reggie didn't do what he couldn't.
So what if that was mostly anything but put the ball in the basket. But he did that so much better than everyone else it comes close to making up for it.
I said close. The Pacers never could have won with Reggie as the clear best player on their team, and they didn't. The depth that the Bender trade sapped that cost them the 2000 title was the only way the team was ever good enough to topple everyone else. But if you take prime Reggie and put him on the post-trade 2004 Pistons instead of Rip that team becomes basically unstoppable and is one of the greatest teams ever assembled.
Top six all time on TS%, second for ORtg. Four first place finishes, three during the prime and a second-place. From 1990-2000 he finished in the top ten for Offensive Win Shares, in seven of those eleven years in the top five.
7. George Gervin / 6-7 / 180Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1978-84 | 29.2 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 1.32 | 0.91 | .572 | 112 | 22.7 | 70.0 | 55.7 | 14.3 | .171 |
Speaking of not knowing you could guard other players.
But we put Gervin here for two reasons.
1. Nobody else on this list could score like him.
2. His actual prime gets knocked ever so slightly by two years. That I'm more than willing to waive him in and kick out his last two years. Because he spent time in the ABA and also played in the 1970s so was obviously destroying his career on cocaine.
But but but but, wait, you said that-Shut up.
Gervin would have put up far better ORtgs if he had played in later eras. Take 1978 the Spurs did 104.5, the league did 100.9. Gervin did 111. I see no reason Gervin could not have played in other eras.
8. Vince Carter / 6-6 / 215Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2000-06 | 23.4 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 1.28 | 0.83 | .533 | 108 | 22.3 | 60.5 | 40.7 | 19.8 | .157 |
Here's where we start actually debating the players.
But the fact is that no matter how much we view Carter as rolling on the floor with the latest "injury" for a couple years he was perhaps the best perimeter player in the game.
I know, the Kobe fans are already prepping their papers. You know if we actually had people who responded to posts on here.
But Vince Carter did not simply destroy the dunk contest in 2000, he was, for maybe three years one of the best perimeter players in the league. Maybe the best. In 1999-00 and 2000-01 he was likely the best perimeter player in the game, and until he was injured in 2001-02 probably the same.
Who knows why he backed off and refused to use his talent after that.
Actually, the answer is clear.
Blame Canada.
9. Ray Allen / 6-5 / 205Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
2000-06 | 21.7 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 1.24 | 0.19 | .579 | 116 | 21.6 | 68.9 | 61.8 | 7.1 | .167 |
There's Reggie, and then there's Ray Allen. And between the two we have a challenge for the best shooter of all time.
That's if we don't include the players like Dale Ellis, Kyle Korver, etc.
If we're consdering the guys who used lots of possessions it is basically between Miller and Allen. And we have to give it to Miller. Allen is the more complete package, but he never as the first option displayed what Miller did. That's their difference. Either one is basically automatic.
Like Moncrief, Allen was another star stuck on a team where he had to be the best player when he should have maybe been second best.
10. Eddie Jones / 6-6 / 190Years | P/36 | R/36 | A/36 | S/36 | B/36 | TS% | ORtg | PER | WS/Y | OWS/Y | DWS/Y | WS/48 |
1997-03 | 17.0 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 1.93 | 0.76 | .558 | 111 | 18.3 | 60.2 | 35.0 | 25.2 | .162 |
Alright so he's not a star. But he's good enough offensively and a great player on the defensive end.
It's really a push between those below and him here. Jones is one of the best defenders to play the position but found himself stuck on team after team where he had to try and score 20ppg without much of any help.
If anything Jones explains the entire position better than anything.
The Next FiveAllen Iverson won an a MVP award somehow but mostly made it there because he shot a lot.
Jeff Hornacek was a minor star but eventually settled into a consistent valuable sidekick.
Walter Davis scored. Really. He did this. He scored.
Hersey Hawkins was also a great scorer before he landed in Seattle and reinvented himself as the bomber/defender that Seattle needed to run to the Finals.
Jason Terry has never done anything anyone ever has noticed, is he even still in the league?
Here's where I usually mention other players at the position who deserve mention.
So I will.
Brent Barry.
That's it.
Good night and good luck.