I guess I am biased as an American, but I still think the English are more useful because they are designed to make some sense and cover a useful ranger rather than to arbitrarily fit in a decimal system. Probably not "designed", but more chosen by trial and error: as in the "foot" is a good scale for human height, but the "hand" is a good scale for the height of horses. Whereas the meter is not really a good scale for the height of either, but we apply it anyway because it can be divided by ten...
Sure centimeters are more precise, but millimeters are even more precise...either one just makes the range some big numbers without much difference between them.
The range between 6'0" to 7'0" seems to me to be parceled out better than 1.82 to 2.13 meters. The difference of a foot means the difference between a small guard and a big center, whereas the difference of a meter means the difference between a small child and an average NBA player. But a little kid, an average adult, and an NBA guard are all 1 meter and some change...I don't find it intuitive for height