robjv1 wrote:Excellent game, just one of those high-tension, nail biter, grind it out defensive games that I love and lots of fans seem to hate. It reminded me a lot of the Detroit/Spurs series in 2005, which was a great one.
Except that the 2005 Finals didn't suck offensively like the 2010 Finals.
This 2010 Finals only had 3 games where one or both teams shot better than 45% from the field, while the 2005 Finals had 5 games where either team had above 45%. The lowest FG% in any game of the 2005 Finals never dropped lower than 37% wherein the 2010 Finals either team had as low as 33%, even more so with the eventually champions winning it with 32.5 from the field in the deciding game seven (
Finals FG% combined for both teams (7 games) with max and min FG% in a game from either teams:
2010 - 42.5 (max: 56.3, min: 32.5)
2005 - 43.2 (max: 47.1, min: 37.1)
The free throw attempts (FTA) discrepancy of this year's Finals is also horrible. The 2005 Finals only had 2 games where one of the teams had a large margin of FTA, the 2010 Finals only had 3 games where both teams FTA are near each other.
Also worth nothing for the 2010 Finals is that the 4 games where one team had the edge in FTA, all of those 4 games favor the Lakers in FTA.
To nitpick some more:
Total Turnovers for both teams
2010 Finals - 179
2005 Finals - 166
The difference might not mean much, but a margin of +/- 10 is somewhat significant. That's 10 possessions lost or 20 points if we assume a FG of 2 points per possession.










