Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:15 am
Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:44 pm
this is the important part, quite possibly the worst defender in the NBA.
-Shoots a high percentage
-Rarely dunks or make spectacular plays
-Converts a lot of three pointers
-Gets to the line more than average
-Passes well
-Committs very few turnovers
-Rebounds well for his position
-Plays good defense
-Doesn't block many shots
-Plays fewer minutes than average due to a crowd at his position
-Was never a high draft pick or attention-getting free agent
-Likely plays in a small market
-Team is likely a non-contender
-Possibly multiple pro-teams in he city
-High scoring average
-Low rebound rate
-Poor passer
-Turnover prone
-Poor defender, but gets blocks and steals
-Plays in a big market/popular team
-In the news fairly often
-Low percentage shooter
-Dunks and makes other spectacular plays
-Doesn't get to the line very often
-Doesn't make many three pointers
-Plays quite a few minutes, padding his per game stats
Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:57 am
Silas wrote:It could be argued that Ben Wallace yields positive results as well, but the Bulls have so many other good players and solid defenders, I'd bet that they could have achieved similar results with a much cheaper low post defender, such as Tyson Chandler, Kurt Thomas, Rasho Nesterovic, Etan Thomas, or Brenden Haywood.
Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:52 am
Sat Jul 14, 2007 2:37 pm
Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:02 pm
Sun Jul 15, 2007 10:01 pm