In this story from ESPN Page 2, Michelle Pressman basically admits what the majority of the sportsworld seems to be thinking. The WNBA isn't succeeding because women's basketball is boring.
With the exception of claiming that Kareem's sky hook was an "amazing physical feat"...I think her article makes a lot of good points. There are many women's sports that are as entertaining as their male counterparts...some even more so (women's tennis). In the case of basketball though, athleticism and size play such a big part in the spectacle of the game that for the average viewer, women just can't provide an entertaining product. Interestingly enough, even the speed of the game is greatly decreased. Great ballhandling, crossovers, and other such ground-based trickery seem to be non-existent also. With the exception of Chamique Holdsclaw and a few other players, the game really is just pass, pass, and a set-shot or layup.
Granted of course, there will always be basketball purists who claim that the women's game is entertaining because it's the way basketball is supposed to be played. That includes more than a few people on this board. But, I really doubt that even those people who say that would subject themselves to the pain of attending a WNBA game. I personally have watched a few games, but only because there was no other basketball on. I'd have switched to a boy's high school game in a second.
So, does everyone pretty much agree with this article's assessment? Elitism and grandstanding aside...does anyone actually, really, truly enjoying sitting through entire women's basketball games?
And while I'm on a roll...let me ask another question. I remember hearing once that the WNBA teams...the best women's basketball players in the world...are only on about the level of a top high school boys team? So who would in a game...the Los Angeles Sparks or Lebron James' St. Vincent St. Mary's team from this past year? Talk to me people.