Main Site | Forum | Rules | Downloads | Wiki | Features | Podcast

NLSC Forum

Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.
Post a reply

Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:48 pm

Sharapova is kinda goofy looking so I can see what Jae is saying.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:29 pm

But she aint ugly either.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:41 pm

I think she has benefited from Kournikova being the Russian hottie before her :idea:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:38 pm

You honestly think that's attractive? She looks like a tanned guy. The face is rodent-like, she has no tits.


I've seen her up close. In civilian attire. Trust me. :wink:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:41 pm

After watching her tonight I will say that shes okayish. Could be better but shes way hotter than some of the other boys playing women's tennis.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:00 pm

My only beef with women tennis players are there mosquito bites (non-existent tits)

Serena Williams seems to be one of the rare players that have "weight problems" (i dont think it's a weight problem, the thin sticks are the weight problems) and actually looks kinda normal (but more like a stereotypical "big black booty bitch")

The point is, tennis players should be determined by skills, not looks, hence Davenport should be the main talk but no, it's some 17 year old stick.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:02 pm

D-Weaver wrote:
You honestly think that's attractive? She looks like a tanned guy. The face is rodent-like, she has no tits.


I've seen her up close. In civilian attire. Trust me. :wink:

You're not making a good argument lol. I'd have no complaints with her, and I know Sits used to girls with no tities.. but imagine her in bed. She'd be a beast but the noise :? haha

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:04 pm

I highly doubt that. Up close she is really good-looking. But then again, opiniona are like assholes, everybody's got 'em. and they all stink even a little bit. :wink:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:06 pm

If the Williams sisters focused on tennis then maybe I would pay attention to the women's side more. They should be in their prime about now but right now all I see are two inconsistent underachievers (even though they have achieved alot). For now the only players I really watch are Nadal, Roddick(somewhat) and Federer.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:06 pm

Yeah she does have a pretty face, but imagine the screaming in bed :twisted:. If she's like that playing with a tennis racket, imagine what she'd be like with a real man :proud: :crazy:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:13 pm

Matthew wrote:Yeah she does have a pretty face, but imagine the screaming in bed :twisted:. If she's like that playing with a tennis racket, imagine what she'd be like with a real man :proud: :crazy:



:Grabs crotch:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:32 pm

D-Weaver wrote:
Matthew wrote:Yeah she does have a pretty face, but imagine the screaming in bed :twisted:. If she's like that playing with a tennis racket, imagine what she'd be like with a real man :proud: :crazy:



:Grabs crotch:


What would your lady think of you getting off to the thought of Sharapova in bed?

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:37 pm

His lady is with me :hump:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:42 pm

What would your lady think of you getting off to the thought of Sharapova in bed?


Most people grab their crotches anticipating pain in teh area, not by getting excited! And the lady agrees with me on the matter of Maria's looks.


His lady is with me


Your hormones are acting up again, eh, Jugie? :lol:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:44 pm

How can one not be attracted to a young Larry Bird look-a-like eh? :wink:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:46 pm

jugs wrote:How can one not be attracted to a young Larry Bird look-a-like eh? :wink:


Let's hope you evolve better than Larry, aesthetically-wise. If not, you're in trouble. :wink:

Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:57 pm

Larry Bird isn't a pindick.

Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:49 pm

James Blake is on tonight boys. Good stuff (Y) Gonna watch him pwn some european dude... from Italy right?

Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:11 pm

He's playing Tommy Robredo, from Spain

Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:21 pm

Ahhh Spanish guy! My bad!

Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:31 pm

If you go to foxsports.com.au and then click on AUS OPEN and then click on live scores, you can get live scores (that's if the game is not live for you, cos it's halfway through the first set already)

Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:16 am

jugs wrote:The point is, tennis players should be determined by skills, not looks, hence Davenport should be the main talk but no, it's some 17 year old stick.

Davenport hasn't won any of the 4 Grand Slam events in the last 2 years. If we're talking about marketing- see Davenport's looks. She has the face of a 70yr old man

dadamafia wrote:If the Williams sisters focused on tennis then maybe I would pay attention to the women's side more. They should be in their prime about now but right now all I see are two inconsistent underachievers (even though they have achieved alot).

This is a little confusing- undercheivers though they've won many titles. Exactly what you expecting?

Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:22 am

I suppose, yet she's managed to be number 1 in the world.

Hingis is now at $4.70 to win it while Davenport is at $3.75. For some reason I think of Hingis being an oldy, she's only like 24 or something but it's been ages since she's won her first Aus Open

Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:38 am

That's a credit to her but at the same time it shows the WTA ranking system can be flawed. How can a person be ranked #1 if she hasn't won any of the major events for 2yrs???

Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:58 am

Year | Aus Open | French | Wimbledon | US
2004 QF 4TH SF SF
2005 RUP QF RUP QF

That's not bad...

Kim Clijsters

2004 RUP - - -
2005 - 4TH 4TH WON

Mauresmo

2004 QF QF SF QF
2005 QF 3RD SF QF

my conclusion is, she's been consistent and has won a lot of minor titles.
Post a reply