Other video games, TV shows, movies, general chit-chat...this is an all-purpose off-topic board where you can talk about anything that doesn't have its own dedicated section.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:19 am
ok, i just watched a Sth Park episode where Cartman says "I'm not fat, i just have a sweet hockey body"
Ok, would the NHL allow a team to have like, the fattest bastard on the planet in goals? i imagine that such a person would block the ENTIRE goal? which would mean that that team would be unbeatable.
Then again each team would look to find some fat ass too. Do they have a certain level of fitness necessary?
i think i'm on to something here.....
Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:21 am
You'd probably need to pass physical tests you know. They wouldn't just let some lard ass play hockey, you'd need to be at least in somewhat of decent shape to play hockey. Hockey's a very tiring and physical sport, so it would be stupid to let someone like that in the net.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:21 am
I remember a thread about Sumu-wrestlers being placed in the goal... Don't remember whether there was an answer on if it's legal, though
Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:24 am
Hockey's a very tiring and physical sport, so it would be stupid to let someone like that in the net.
not if you just sit there....
imagine it, they have to wheel the lard ass onto the ice rink. That'd be mega amusing.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:40 am
Its_asdf wrote:You'd probably need to pass physical tests you know. They wouldn't just let some lard ass play hockey, you'd need to be at least in somewhat of decent shape to play hockey. Hockey's a very tiring and physical sport, so it would be stupid to let someone like that in the net.
I thought you didn't like hockey
It may be a good idea, actually it happened once, anyone remember Turk Broda? The guy ate a stack of pancakes before every game. The difference would be that he had skill, whereas some random fat-ass off the street would probably have no skill at all. Or maybe they would, as it's always the fat kid that played goalie as a kid
Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:45 am
hm.. there was this commerical where the dude squeezed himself in...
i actually dont see why this would be illegal cause if you got a guy size of shaq in goal with pads.. u dont have much openings
or oliver miller without pads
Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:48 am
I think it is impossible to cover the whole goal because I believe the goalie has to be a certain length away from the goals. Maybe, I don't watch hockey so I wouldn't know.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:49 am
not if you just sit there....
To be a goalie it can be very tiring. You're wearing a ton of equipment for 60 minutes. You also need very quick reflexes, agility, and quickness since pucks fly around everywhere at 4905859043205489 mph.
I thought you didn't like hockey
I don't, but I live in Leaf country. The damn game's everywhere.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 4:11 am
You also need very quick reflexes, agility, and quickness since pucks fly around everywhere at 4905859043205489 mph.
yes, but not if
such a person would block the ENTIRE goal?
which would mean that you just sit there and absorb the shots.
Juts pretend this guy is so huge that there is not possibility of scoring past him because there is daylight in the goals.
Imagine the impact of that? surely, if already there isn't any rules, then they'd make some. That team would win as long as fatty sits in goals.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 4:16 am
Actually there are fat goalies in the NHL. It might be possible.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 4:39 am
Juts pretend this guy is so huge that there is not possibility of scoring past him because there is daylight in the goals.
Like I said before, I seriously don't think they would allow someone as physically unfit as that to block the net.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:16 am
I dont think theres anyone fat enough to cover the WHOLE net, and be confortable in the hockey gear.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:19 am
They'd get bigger gear, stupid.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:55 am
Yeahm but a fat guy in all that gear would sweat like crazy and wouldn last more than 3minutes. I mean even sitting on the bench, the guy would sweat like mad.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:20 am
Matt wrote:Hockey's a very tiring and physical sport, so it would be stupid to let someone like that in the net.
not if you just sit there....
imagine it, they have to wheel the lard ass onto the ice rink. That'd be mega amusing.
Oh, thanks Matt, that made my crack up so hard.
If the distance thing Riot proposed is indeed true, the huge goalie plot would fail.
But if it is not a problem, there are LOTS of people big enough to cover an entire hockey goal and just sit there with a big grin on their face.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:46 am
Yeahm but a fat guy in all that gear would sweat like crazy and wouldn last more than 3minutes. I mean even sitting on the bench, the guy would sweat like mad
But that fat guy is sitting on huge court of
ice. Is sweating still plausible doing nothing on ice?
Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:23 am
"Come on, defense, defense! You call that blowing?"
Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:53 am
shadowgrin wrote:But that fat guy is sitting on huge court of
ice. Is sweating still plausible doing nothing on ice?

Have you ever worn hockey pads? He would sweat.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:29 pm
ixcuincle wrote:Actually there are fat goalies in the NHL. It might be possible.

They would score top shelf.
Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:37 pm
Jesse wrote:I remember a thread about Sumu-wrestlers being placed in the goal... Don't remember whether there was an answer on if it's legal, though
Yeah, I remember posting something about that before. I still believe that it's impossible to cover the entire goal when there's a wide open gap between the legs. There's no way you can cover the entire net, even with the fattest legs.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.