Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:42 am
IN HEAT wrote:Valor wrote:Tell me that when Dwyane Wade can play at least 80 games a season first and produce as much as Kobe does.
Look friend you first tell me Drose can play some games without blowing his knee then we talk about Dwane okay?? He is the best SG and more efficience and you are Chicago fan so you never will admit he is best SG if you look at the numbers GOSH some people on this place![]()
NovU wrote:Valor wrote:SoF'nAwesome wrote:It isn't "by far" anymore, Harden changed that last season.
By doing what? Jacking up shots at a sub 40% clip, flopping his way to the line, turning the ball over and playing no defense?
Getting to the line always has been James Harden's strength, he loves to drive and draw contact, flopping or not, it's not surprising why he gets the calls. And he wasn't the one who was on the team that were desperate to make the playoffs with referees' help from mid season(Remember whose FTA took a big hike suddenly, not Harden's, someone else became untouchable, you look at him, they called fouls). And he shot better TS% than Kobe. Also note that his team won games with offense, now guess who was the biggest contributor in that aspect for offensive Juggernaut Rockets. Yet Harden's defensively defected team was a better defensive team than Kobe's Lakers.
Here's the thing. Harden's team overachieved vastly but none of it is due to Harden's excellency?? (Compare that to The Lakers underachieving greatly, but it's never Kobe's fault because he scored 30ppg, omg?!). Remember before Harden trade, nobody took the Rockets as a playoffs team, with Lin and Asik core, lol. And we still have this stupid talk on Harden's ability in W column.
NovU wrote:Valor wrote:Kobe Bryant, who is still the best SG in the league by far and hasn't given any indications of a decline in production last season
LoL. Not in my world
NovU wrote:It may not be entirely his fault but it is HIS enormous contract's fault. He's getting paid the most in the league by vast margin once again while he's hardly a top 20 player. It's because of that people were suggesting he could have taken less. All of us know this is more business deal than basketball deal which you seem to be claiming it's actually close to a basketball deal because Kobe's still the best player at his position that wins you tons of games.
Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:20 am
Valor wrote:I probably haven't said it on here, but I've never seen Harden as the reason why the Rockets went to the postseason last year, Asik was. You look at the astronomical difference in the Rockets play with Asik on and off the court last season. Without him the Rockets are trash, with him playing Houston's defense was able to go from trash to middle-of-the-pack, which was a huge reason why they were able to be an "offensive juggernaut", which they were not.
I said it then and I maintain my stance, with Lin, Asik, Kevin Martin, Parsons etc at that time Houston was going to the playoffs. Harden actually made them WORSE by stopping ball movement. Just watch some of Houston's games, it's even worse now that Howard is there, a lot of possessions the ball either gets stuck to Howard or Harden for 20 seconds before they move it and have to force up a bad shot. It's pathetic.
Valor wrote:So you think he should've told management he wants less money on his contract when he's presented with that offer and especially when he is arguably worth that sky-high price due to his production AND the ticket-selling? It's both a business deal and a basketball deal. Should they have offered less to start with? Yes. Was it Kobe's fault? No. Stop pretending it was some scrub getting a huge contract. He's Kobe frigging Bryant, a guy who CARRIED the Lakers last season dragging the self-conceited overrated inept diva known as Dwight Howard to the playoffs.
Valor wrote:And are you serious? Kobe isn't a top 20 player!? If that's a joke that's a good one.
Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:58 am
Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:52 am
Valor wrote:IN HEAT wrote:Look friend you first tell me Drose can play some games without blowing his knee then we talk about Dwane okay?? He is the best SG and more efficience and you are Chicago fan so you never will admit he is best SG if you look at the numbers GOSH some people on this place![]()
Oh, now you going to take shots at Derrick Rose because I pointed out a fact about Wade? I am not just talking about numbers. If it's just numbers there's one that blows Wade out already and that's ring count. Wade in his prime wasn't the best SG in the league, now with him on a sharp decline and Kobe coming off one of his most efficient seasons? Please, it's not even a discussion. As you pointed out, I'm a Chicago fan, no reason for me to take the side of a Laker, and Wade IS from Chicago, so there's your claim of me being biased gone to trash. Look at yourself before you go sarcastic and judge others, hypocrite.
Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:49 am
Valor wrote:Well that's the thing, it's not like he didn't take less money, he just took the one and only deal the Lakers gave him. What was he to do? Tell them to give him the minimum? (Which I've seen a lot of people suggesting...)
Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:25 am
NovU wrote:The Rockets were 6th in offense and 16th in defense. Also notice none of offensive better teams had worse defense than the Rockets.
NovU wrote:And no, Kevin Martin would NEVER have been better for the Rockets than Harden, kidding me, lol.
NovU wrote:And the Rockets this season are a fine team, so don't worry. They're 3rd in offense and 12th in defense. They're an improved team no matter how you think possessions get stuck and look pathetic. They don't need Asik anymore btw.
NovU wrote:So he's Kobe friggin Bryant so you give him all the money you can? That's just stupid and silly and sadly exactly what happened, which the fans are pointing fingers at. But hey, don't forget I'm the first one that acknowledged that he deserved all the contract money purely in business sense.
NovU wrote:At this point? I can say that.
IN HEAT wrote:fuck you cuz dwane wade is the best good for you you cant read this small lines
Andrew wrote:No question. I think some people expected him to save the Lakers' ownership from themselves and say "Look, I appreciate this offer and what it says about all my years of service, but what's your plan for us to have a chance at contending these next two years? I will take less money if it means we can bring in some quality players." It's not a particularly fair expectation when such a lucrative contract has been put on the table for him without any negotiations, but some fans are going to look at the sacrifices that other players have made and wonder why Kobe - who is all about winning, after all - didn't hesitate and think about the team. Once again though, that's expecting him to do the job of the front office and ownership, and somehow take responsibility for them.
At the end of the day, some fans are a bit disappointed about the possible ramifications it will have on the Lakers re-tooling and getting back into contention, and they just want to lash out. Kobe cops the brunt of it because it's easier to portray him as selfish and greedy, unfair as that may be.
Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:27 pm
Valor wrote:Without Asik they would've been 30th in defense and nowhere near the playoffs
Valor wrote:Looking at how productive he is and how inefficient Harden is with the ball movement that would've happened without Harden? Yes he would have been in that system.
Valor wrote:It wasn't all the money they could've given him, he took a paycut in case you didn't notice.
Valor wrote:Only because they flop to the line so often, not to mention Jeremy Lin saving their behind all those games before he went down. Did you also forget they were winning big when Harden was out?
Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:02 pm
NovU wrote:Valor wrote:Without Asik they would've been 30th in defense and nowhere near the playoffs
In what world do you think Asik's a 15 rank differential guy in defense. Do you actually believe he's a Bill Russell in disguise?
NovU wrote:Only one who's inefficient is Kobrick.
NovU wrote:Valor wrote:It wasn't all the money they could've given him, he took a paycut in case you didn't notice.
LoL
Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:48 pm
Valor wrote:He's not a household name and he doesn't make the highlights unlike those Miami Heat guys you love, but he's one of the best defensive players in the league. Don't like it, suck it up. It's a fact.
Valor wrote:Obvious who the hater is here.
Kobe last season average 27 on 46%. turnover % of 13%
Harden averaged 25 on 43%, turnover % of 15% (this season 17%)
Who's the more inefficient and ineffective one here? and if you actually watch the games you won't even have to look at the stats to know who's better.
Valor wrote:NovU wrote:Valor wrote:It wasn't all the money they could've given him, he took a paycut in case you didn't notice.
LoL
That is a factually correct statement, don't know why you are denying that.
Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:41 pm
Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:38 am
NovU wrote:I see some fair points, but Asik's not the kind of caliber player you think he is. Defense has more to do with system than individual's excellence btw though Asik did a great job on defensive end last season. In fact, there's a trade off for his one dimensional game anyway. But you don't see me going arguing the Rockets could have been top offensive team if it wasn't for Asik, I find the argument stupid just like the one you're saying they'd have fallen to 30th in defense without Asik, Stephen A Smith type of baseless blasphemy no fact no nothing. The bottomline is the Rockets loved to attack and attack and their offense was superior most of night with Harden leading them. (Btw Kobe's defense was MUCH more questionable last season. One of the reasons why some Wade fans raved Wade was the best SG last season which I disagree.)
NovU wrote:LoL, why does Miami sig bother you? It absolutely has nothing to do with this discussion so don't be like that, aww.
Valor wrote:Obvious who the hater is here.
Kobe last season average 27 on 46%. turnover % of 13%
Harden averaged 25 on 43%, turnover % of 15% (this season 17%)
Who's the more inefficient and ineffective one here? and if you actually watch the games you won't even have to look at the stats to know who's better.
NovU wrote:It would make more sense if better offers were on the table, don't you think? But as you yourself said, he took the only deal that was on the table. HE DID NOT LEAVE ANY MONEY ON THE TABLE. Dwight took a pay cut, LBJ took a pay cut, Duncan took a pay cut, Nash took a pay cut. Kobe? LoL Only real reason you are saying he took a 'paycut' is because he is getting paid historically the most this season. Does NOT change the fact that he's getting overpaid with his new contract which could limit Lakers' upside. That is a fact and focal point you're ignoring in this stupid pointless discussion of yours. Everybody else was pretty much on the same page until you called out on them.
Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:24 am
Valor wrote: The Rockets are middle-of-the-pack defensively because of this fast pace
and all those turnovers they get from forcing the action.
Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:27 am
Valor wrote:The Rockets love to attack because their so-called best player is Harden and all McHale does is give him the ball so he can jack up more shots.
Valor wrote:The Rockets are middle-of-the-pack defensively because of this fast pace and all those turnovers they get from forcing the action. Kind of hard for Asik to take over defensively when he's a 7 footer running after point guards on fast breaks after Harden either bricks it or turns it over?
Valor wrote:As for Kobe's defense, anything he did was better than Harden's complete lack of it
http://i.imgur.com/XLqwcnD.gif
http://i.imgur.com/L9QN8oq.gif
http://i.imgur.com/QKtHedg.gif
http://i.imgur.com/VUgeHXs.gif
http://i.imgur.com/omAjonq.gif
http://i.imgur.com/1lxzauO.gif
http://i.imgur.com/Jh4NGLi.gif
http://i.imgur.com/imbOcmI.gif
http://d3j5vwomefv46c.cloudfront.net/ph ... 453239.gif
I mean when you let Jodie Meeks blow by you, there's a problem.
Valor wrote:You should take into account who exactly was playing with Kobe last season? Did I forget to mention he had a huge baggage by the name of Dwight Howard who demands the ball in the post and pounds it for 20 seconds before passing it out so Kobe and the others have to shoot a bad shot off before the shot clock expires? I'm shocked Kobe even got 46% shooting with that.
Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:45 pm
benji wrote:Valor wrote: The Rockets are middle-of-the-pack defensively because of this fast pace
7th?
benji wrote:and all those turnovers they get from forcing the action.
Dead last?
NovU wrote:Valor wrote:The Rockets love to attack because their so-called best player is Harden and all McHale does is give him the ball so he can jack up more shots.
Sounds more like Kobe. How many times has Pau Gasol emphasized on needs of ball movement(he even said *away from Kobe iirc) both implicitly and explicitly? How many times from teammates of his? How about Phil Jackson who even wrote a book how it's impossible to coach Kobe?
NovU wrote:Harden's a legitimate playmaker proven from OKC days. You don't have anyone that can replace his production at his usage in this league at his position. It's not McHale that's doing wrong for playing him to his strength.
NovU wrote:No. That's just a sorry ass excuse. The Rockets are not good at defense simply because they're playing to their strength and also because they don't have enough defensive assets/system in place. Parsons and Lin are awful, Beverley's undersized and was still at development stage.
That's actually where Asik's value comes into play. Iso defense is meaningless in today's league. One on one defense is just stupid and non-existent anyway, why do that, when there's zone defense allowed. Asik's a self-sufficient help defender that would rotate over to challenge shots near the rim. That's what all primary defensive bigs do in today's league aka Noah, Hibbert, Robin Lopez, anyone for that matter. Ofc the Rockets stuck to his strength when it came to defense. He shined at what he did, kinda like Reggie Evans with his rebounding.
NovU wrote:I've seen those GIFs plenty times previously and I actually find them stupid. For some reason, Harden's become a 'love to hate' guy in past couple years and these kind of stupid GIFs are constantly presented as evidence in nearly all Harden discussions when any player in the league had their shares of lackluster moments in defense. Heck, I watch Celtics game often and Avery Bradley gets his facial plays on D at least couple times a game. Kobe didn't play no D last season (he's stopped playing D since long ago), it's factual. But is it really fair to blame Kobe or Harden for being sleepers on D?
At the end of the day, why would anyone give a fuck as long as they aren't defensive loopholes like Bargnani is (his blk numbers are largely a consequence of the opponent singling him out to attack defensively). Quoting benji's previous post on defense...
NovU wrote:Somethings never change. It's always like this. It was Shaq's fault back in the days, Bynum next, now Dwight's fault for holding Kobe back. (Vice versa, everything good happens is always Kobe's deeds, lol) Story that Kobists/media loved to sell and buy into. Yet that 'baggage' has gone to the Rockets and they are doing just fine. Not to mention Kobe having a rejuvenated season alongside that 'baggage'. This baseless accusation is getting way too silly.
Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:53 pm
Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:11 pm
NovU wrote:Valor, you are in denial. No reasoning of yours makes any sense but most of it is made up bullshit narrative to suit your purpose. When Kobe sucks, it's his fault not everyone else around him. When Harden sucks, it's also his fault but when he doesn't, it's also to his credit not Asik.
Reminds me of infamous koberulz (though he was open to reasons and eventually came around).
Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:23 pm
Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:07 pm
NovU wrote:Only thing I'm ignoring are your fake narrative which you amazingly think are facts. LoL
- OH ASKIK'S BETTER PLAYER THAN HARDEN!
- OH KOBE SUCKED BCUZ OF HOWARD!
yet the Rockets are winning with Howard more.
Fucking stupid garbage argument if you ask me, no facts no nothing, just a loudmouth. Deal with it? Gimme a break.
Thu Dec 05, 2013 2:34 am
Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:07 am
Valor wrote:Kobe would've won more than 1.
Valor wrote:There's also no need to do all those personal insults. Seriously? Grow up already. It's not only "stats" and highlights that count, but obviously you don't understand that.
Valor wrote:Oh and btw? The "Kobe has no D" argument you've stated as a means to insult him?
Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:17 am
NovU wrote:He just didn't get the enough usage to do it enough under Kobe-heavy system. It's impossible, both mathematically and physically.
Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:31 am
Valor wrote:Harden's so bad defensively it's not even funny. Kobe scored more, grabbed more rebounds, dished out more assists, connected a higher percentage of his shots, played far better defense, and turned the ball over less with a far less talented group at his disposal last season. He plays far smarter basketball and is more fundamentally sound.
But I guess you will dispute all these as a "fucking stupid garbage argument" just because you don't like Kobe.
Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:37 am
IN HEAT wrote:NovU wrote:He just didn't get the enough usage to do it enough under Kobe-heavy system. It's impossible, both mathematically and physically.
Don't make things up. The guy got the ball; fumbled it away or threw up some ugly ass brick.
NovU wrote:I'm not the one that's making bullcraps up.
NovU wrote:Just for the fun sake, let's look at how this guy's garbage logic works. Kobe took 258 more shot attempts and scored only 110 more points than Harden while playing 28 more minutes. Hooray, Kobe's the best! ...... I told you this is some phony garbage stuff. He still calls Harden a chucker and Kobe a smart player. Evidently Kobe was 3rd in usage% in the league only behind Westbrook and Carmelo. Wade and Harden were 7 and 8th respectively. Isn't it a common sense already that you are likely to produce more when you have ball in your hands more?
NovU wrote:now imagine how many more points Harden could have created if he took 258 more shots while getting to the line at the rate he usually does. *shudders*
NovU wrote:Also fundamentally sound my ass? Pounding the ball 20 times per each possession while nobody else gets to touch the ball is fundamentally a sound basketball play?
NovU wrote:Kobe and Harden's difference in defense is minimal and extremely subjective even if you tried to quantify (which isn't possible btw) in numbers. I told you, it's meaningless unless we are talking Avery Bradley who's a significant superior to rest, who's constantly put up against opponent's primary playmaker each and every night. Kobe guards offensively handicapped players, it's been like that for ages unless we're talking couple plays here and there.
Also see how it can be countered. Harden does far better in steals, blocks, and charges than Kobe. Wade's been the best in these category with a slight lead on Harden.
NovU wrote:Now, here's the real issue. You're entirely ignoring how the Rockets last season was structured to win 45 games. It was with Harden's offensive ability and capable defense in place backed up by Asik. Harden was the heart and backbone of the team and that's no matter how you fucking look at it. You call it inefficient, but guards that shoot over .600TS% and mass produce are extremely rare. Try naming a few. They just had every reasons to capitalize on that. Everyone else are pieces that play to their roles, making them somewhat expandable within established system offered by Harden.
NovU wrote:these entire topic now is meaningless and stupid. Vast majority of your arguments at this point are silly and stupid, and are has-beens. It's just a tiresome discussion all over again. Not surprising though, we do get Kobist popping up out of nowhere every now and then.
Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:34 am
Valor wrote:Oh wow Kobe's 3rd in usage, he must be a bad player. Oh wait, who else was on that Lakers team? Steve Nash who wasn't even on the floor most of the time due to injuries? Pau Gasol at the three point line? Metta World Peace the greatest offensive option ever lived? Maybe there's a reason why he was 3rd in usage? Somebody has to finish off possessions don't you think?
Valor wrote:Meanwhile Harden had all those other weapons and he still has horrible shot selection after pounding the ball for 20 odd seconds. Oh and lets not forget he cries and moans and shits on his teammates when he doesn't get the ball, ignoring set plays in the process. So yes, that's not playing smart basketball and would classify as a "chucker".
Valor wrote:You do realize shot attempts don't count when you get fouled right? Maybe the reason Harden doesn't have as many shot attempts as Kobe is because he flails his arms, twists his body and flops his way to the line everytime he's near a defender.
Valor wrote:rofl at using blocks and steals and (good lord) charges as the lone indicators of "defense". So apparently if you get some steals and flops to the ground for charge calls you are a great defensive player even when you give up nearly a full point per defensive possession overall, including way over a point per in spot ups and off screens, as a GUARD. Did I mention those were his primary responsibilities? You yourself pointed out that one on one defense isn't the most important skill in the NBA, and here you are denying the fact that Harden is beyond shit at defense.
Valor wrote:The Rockets would've won 45 games with Kevin Martin instead of Harden. Ball movement, man movement and defense will be better. Guess who also shoots over 60% TS and mass produces? Yep, Kevin Martin (.608), and since you love this stat so much to praise Harden to the heavens, he's not even the best Rocket guard in that, this season Jeremy Lin is at .641
Valor wrote:As I said, Harden's a glorified sixth man that is a volume shooter who is capable of scoring in bunches, he has no business running a team as the primary ball handler and first option.
Once again, nice mouth, you must be incapable of getting a point across without using excessive profanity.
Valor wrote:Labeling, insulting, and belittling someone when you can't counter cold hard facts. I pity you.
Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:04 pm