No No No, you are still doing it wrong. I am NOT obssessed with you at all but rather you are. Like I said, I don't really care about stupid things you or whatever the insult you are trying to pull here in this forum. Through our Private Message, it was evident that you have complex issues, not me. So let's keep this meaningless insult to a minimum and stick to the basketball. Kid.
mandich wrote:If you watched Indiana games you wouldn't need an explanation. His defensivly perfect body and great IQ make it virtually impossible to score on him when he is locked in. And if sou watched Miami games( which you should given the fact you are a so called diegard fan) you should see lebron isn't always giving his best on the defensive end of the floor.
First of all, I said about Paul George deserving in the class of LBJ if not better, defensively. What you said still doesn't place Paul George in another level that you can rightfully call him a winner over LBJ. I repeat. They both were probably everyone's pick anyways when it comes to a discussion. I already respected/sensed that from Spree's initial comment. You obviously missed the point, kid.
Sigh... Here. Get IT for god's sake this time. You keep missing the point and say stupid things so PLZ GET IT. The Pacers have one of the best defensive anchors in the league with Roy Hibbert. Paul George is the best perimeter defender. Both of them have done amazing and I believe they deserve huge credits. In case you didn't notice, I was the first one to mention their names because everybody was praising how great Gasol/Allen were. But mind you. As much as I love their case, LBJ had his own as well. Unlike you said, he doesn't sleep on defense. There are lots of attributes to consider in defense. Not just 'lock on'(on-ball D) which is the only thing you mentioned. I will expand on this more with Chris Paul.
mandich wrote:Chris Paul is a bad defender, I really don't care what you say, that is ma opinion.
Not really. If that's your opinion, you aren't backing it up right so you should have avoided making stupid claims.
Chris Paul rewards your team with 2.4 extra possessions per game(which often leads to easy baskets) with his great instinct and quick hands. That's a given, even basketball idiots know that. He was the best in the league this season in steals and 2nd best in STL%. The Clippers force a lot of TOs and Chris Paul played big part of it.
Now here's why you don't think he isn't good. Because he isn't the best ON-BALL defensive guard in the league. That's obvious. But he is smart. Not just smart. But exceptionally smart as a defensive player that he makes up for it with other defensive elements. He is probably the best at reading screens and cut plays. His exceptional decision making skills often baits opponents players to make mistakes. He rips the ball free time to time from opponent's bigs down low. And he's pretty good at defensive rebounding for a point guard. Add up defensive attributes and Chris Paul indeed belongs to upper class of defensive elites in today's PGs. Is he the clearcut best? Maybe and maybe not. But even if he wasn't, he's not that far off. I've sorta never seen any credible person saying he's a SHITTY DEFENDER.