What does Wikipedia have against soap?

Along with racketeering and money laundering charges.

Heard the Gambino family was uploading their future plans to whack Joe Bluepants.

Well, megaupload was the only website I could get good speed.

All these students freaking out and they can just use Google or search their school library search engine for peer-reviewed journals.

Wouldn't that be the way to go anyway? I'm assuming most schools wouldn't accept Wikipedia as a legitimate source.

Wikipedia can be a good source if used correctly. If the article is well-sourced and you can check the citations, then it is a reliable article.

Well, megaupload was the only website I could get good speed.

Really? Try Mediafire. Upload and download rate is relatively fast if you have decent internet and I have few files that are 1-2 years old and still not deleted .

Wikipedia can be a good source if used correctly. If the article is well-sourced and you can check the citations, then it is a reliable article.

For sure, but as I understand it most educators still aren't that high up on it as a reference, even if an article does satisfy their standards for accuracy and citations.

Anyway, Wikipedia is an OPEN SOURCE site, which everyone can write, edit freely. They must use other resources. My teachers at school are extremely strict against Wikipedia.

Yes,that's the common complaint educators have against it.

If you can't work out how to find the sources the Wikipedia page used, and cite them instead, you deserve whatever horrible mark you get.

If you can't work out how to find the sources the Wikipedia page used, and cite them instead, you deserve whatever horrible mark you get.

Thread...