Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:18 pm
Lacy Banks wrote:If Indiana Pacers forward Jermaine O'Neal gets only one first-place vote for NBA most valuable player, it's my vote. Yes, I know I wrote last week that I was joining the consensus in voting for Minnesota Timberwolves forward Kevin Garnett. From a statistical standpoint, he qualifies amply for such consideration, and I was all ready to vote for him.
But a fellow NBA reporter recently e-mailed me about how rude Garnett continues to be to the media, never granting pregame interviews and making reporters, pressed by deadlines, wait long after games to talk with him. I then remembered the experiences I and other Chicago writers have had with him, and this is supposed to be one of his homes.
He makes only one trip a year to play in Chicago. But I remember that one time he visited, he was injured and was not going to suit up and play that night. Still, he refused to give me an interview. I reminded him that I was the first NBA writer to interview him before and after he was drafted straight out of high school in 1995, but he still gave me the cold shoulder.
I always have had a policy of voting for the human qualities of an MVP candidate, as well as his basketball talent. I look at each candidate's character, professionalism and willingness to promote the product of which he is a part and which has made him quite wealthy. All of a sudden, Garnett was no longer my choice for MVP. I then turned to O'Neal, who always has been courteous to me and has granted me interviews before and after games. Besides, O'Neal is the primary reason the Pacers finished with the best record in the league during the regular season and have home-court advantage throughout the playoffs
Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:50 pm
Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:16 pm
Lamrock wrote:It's pretty much a wash. Wade put up slightly better stats on a slightly better team, but Kobe is the first option/primary ballhandler while Wade shares those duties with LeBron. Wade's a better player, but I'd probably give the nod to Kobe. Would almost be tempted to put Wade/Kobe on first team, then move Rose on to the second...
Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:29 pm
Sun Apr 17, 2011 12:21 am
ZanShadow wrote:Lamrock wrote:It's pretty much a wash. Wade put up slightly better stats on a slightly better team, but Kobe is the first option/primary ballhandler while Wade shares those duties with LeBron. Wade's a better player, but I'd probably give the nod to Kobe. Would almost be tempted to put Wade/Kobe on first team, then move Rose on to the second...
But you are the stat guy.
Win Share per 48 Min wise, Kobe is the primary option on his team but definitely not the best player at mere 0.179 while Gasol's at 0.232. Wade might not be the primary option but his WS sitting at 0.218 which is superior than Kobe's, and almost all his stats are better(see for urself) than Kobe except in a few.
I see Kobe on most pplz list but nobody seems to have a solid case to back that up.
Sun Apr 17, 2011 12:38 am
Sun Apr 17, 2011 12:48 am
ZanShadow wrote:Win Share per 48 Min wise, Kobe is the primary option on his team but definitely not the best player at mere 0.179 while Gasol's at 0.232.
koberulz wrote:That's their WS/48, not their WS.
koberulz wrote:Interestingly, Wade has a lower AST%.
Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:46 am
ZanShadow wrote:koberulz wrote:That's their WS/48, not their WS.
So...?
Wow. Am I supposed to say that I'm impressed.
As usual, you try to quote out of context.
So what's your opinion? Can you bit little more clear?
Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:02 pm
Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:30 pm
Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:46 pm
Thu Apr 21, 2011 8:45 pm
Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:47 am
Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:39 am
Qballer wrote:Lamar is 6th man & Kevin Love is the most improved player. i still dont think love is improved, he was this good last year, he's just getting more minutes this season
Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:46 am