Reggie Miller snubbed for HOF class of 2011

I just hope Rodman gets in. He was a major reason Chicago won their last 3 championship titles.

Tex Winter should of course be inducted as well.

Agreed, I hope he gets in first ballot. I'm keen to see his speech, too.

sorry for the bump, but its out of my mind how can you say Reggie is better than Mitch or that Richmond is not in the same class as Payton...Even MJ said Mitch was his toughest opponent in his career, what the fuck are you talking about?

I think what was being referred to was what Reggie and Payton had accomplished in their careers compared to Richmond and not solely a comparison of their skills as players.

I think what was being referred to was what Reggie and Payton had accomplished in their careers compared to Richmond and not solely a comparison of their skills as players.

Mitch - NBA Champion (2002)
NBA Rookie of the Year (1989)
6× NBA All-Star (1993–1998)
3× All-NBA Second Team (1994–1995, 1997)
2× All-NBA Third Team (1996, 1998)
NBA All-Rookie First Team (1989)
NBA All-Star Game MVP (1995)
#2 Retired by Sacramento Kings

Reggie - 5× NBA All-Star (1990, 1995–1996, 1998, 2000)
3× All-NBA Third Team (1995–1996, 1998)
J. Walter Kennedy Citizenship Award (2004)
1994 FIBA World Champion
1996 Olympic Gold Medalist

yeeeah, im not sure about that...

Sure, Richmond was a key contributor on winning that ring in 2002. Those 2 minutes per game (4 minutes total over 2 games played) were really helpful in the post season. What would the Lakers have done without him.

Check how many post seasons Reggie played/carried his team in as opposed to Mitch Richmond.

Sure, Richmond was a key contributor on winning that ring in 2002. Those 2 minutes per game (4 minutes total over 2 games played) were really helpful in the post season. What would the Lakers have done without him.

Check how many post seasons Reggie played/carried his team in as opposed to Mitch Richmond.

are you aware of the fact that Kings GMs always sucked and Richmond was the only not terriawful player on that team for 7 years? and he singlehandedly took Kings to playoffs in 96?

Reggie miller will most likely make it. I think it will be much better if he make it next year, it would be in baf taste if he makes it in the year his 3pt shooting toal was broken.

are you aware of the fact that Kings GMs always sucked and Richmond was the only not terriawful player on that team for 7 years? and he singlehandedly took Kings to playoffs in 96?

Too bad he got worse when the playoffs started.

Reggie miller will most likely make it. I think it will be much better if he make it next year, it would be in baf taste if he makes it in the year his 3pt shooting toal was broken.

I disagree, I don't think there's any good reason to hold off on it just because of the coincidental timing of his record being broken around the same time he becomes eligible for the Halll. He should've at least been amongst the finalists, it's bizarre that he didn't make the cut ahead of some of the other individuals that did.

I think what was being referred to was what Reggie and Payton had accomplished in their careers compared to Richmond and not solely a comparison of their skills as players.

Mitch - NBA Champion (2002)
NBA Rookie of the Year (1989)
6× NBA All-Star (1993–1998)
3× All-NBA Second Team (1994–1995, 1997)
2× All-NBA Third Team (1996, 1998)
NBA All-Rookie First Team (1989)
NBA All-Star Game MVP (1995)
#2 Retired by Sacramento Kings

Reggie - 5× NBA All-Star (1990, 1995–1996, 1998, 2000)
3× All-NBA Third Team (1995–1996, 1998)
J. Walter Kennedy Citizenship Award (2004)
1994 FIBA World Champion
1996 Olympic Gold Medalist

yeeeah, im not sure about that...

WS/48 for Reggie Miller VS WS/48 for Mitch Richmond
0.110 ......................................... 0.098
0.124 ......................................... 0.090
0.182 ......................................... 0.133
0.202 ......................................... 0.076
0.169 ......................................... 0.087
0.183 ......................................... 0.106
0.212 ......................................... 0.120
0.204 ......................................... 0.151
0.188 ......................................... 0.166
0.200 ......................................... 0.148
0.206 ......................................... 0.082
0.172 ......................................... 0.104
0.162 ......................................... 0.065
0.155 ......................................... 0.062
0.159
0.168
0.189
0.151

Playoff games played: Mitch 23 VS Reggie 144

What the fuck is the point of this argument? I don't even hate Mitch. In fact, I used to love watching Mitch play as he was my favorite player at one point(I even remember him being on the cover of first NBA Live PC game I bought.) and I recognize his awesomeness when he was in prime. But Reggie made a bigger impact with longer career and success in the playoffs. Great clutch player who was loyal, intensive and one of the best 3 point shooter in the history if not the best. 8-9 good years from Mitch, but it falls a little short(especially in popularity) when you compare that to what Reggie and Payton brought to the league.

Mitch Richmond was a good player but his career has been long been over-hyped by a number of factors:
1. The scoring streak.
2. The Jordan quote.
3. Run TMC.
4. The epic gap between Jordan and the rest of the two guards that's incomparable to almost any other situation at any position in league history and the irrational desire by the media and fans for a proper "rivalry" among stars. (See also, all the whining about Shaq.)

Neither Miller nor Richmond are in Payton's class. For one thing, Payton did things other than score. And there was a period where he was likely the best player at a competitive position.

I did learn today that Miller went to the All-Star game far fewer times than I thought. Would have figured he was a reserve staple for a while. He didn't even go in most of his highest scoring seasons, must play for a winner rule in effect there.

Mitch Richmond was a good player but his career has been long been over-hyped by a number of factors:
1. The scoring streak.
2. The Jordan quote.
3. Run TMC.
4. The epic gap between Jordan and the rest of the two guards that's incomparable to almost any other situation at any position in league history and the irrational desire by the media and fans for a proper "rivalry" among stars. (See also, all the whining about Shaq.)

Neither Miller nor Richmond are in Payton's class. For one thing, Payton did things other than score. And there was a period where he was likely the best player at a competitive position.

I did learn today that Miller went to the All-Star game far fewer times than I thought. Would have figured he was a reserve staple for a while. He didn't even go in most of his highest scoring seasons, must play for a winner rule in effect there.

overhyped? He was probably the most underrated superstar in the league, speaking of Miller, he said that Mitch Richmond is the second best 2 guard that has ever played against too. Im not like Mitch's big fan or anything, but wow, hes still so unbelievably underrated, he has arguable one of the best strokes in the NBA ever, is extremely strong, shoots from perimeter better than MJ, yeah, MJ is still a much better player, but Mitch also was a one man army, I'm pretty sure that Richmond will be forgotten after like 10 years because he has never been very popular nor has played in a not terriawful team in his prime. Shame really, I would've loved him in Knicks or any decent East team. His matchups with MJ were epic, as were with Miller(Miller v MJ and Starks v MJ were still the best matchups EVER, even though I really, really hate Miller for being dirty whiner).

People talk about Richmond like he's one of the unrecognized greats (ala God Damn Dantley) or was some kind of superstar. He wasn't. He's more like Rip Hamilton, Ben Gordon or Michael Redd than anything resembling a superstar player. Or a "one-man army."

Starks v MJ ... best matchups EVER

blech.

Im not like Mitch's big fan or anything

Nah. I'd say it's pretty clear you're one of those blinded "the 90's were the best time of basketball ever!" fans. I don't see how John Starks could be involved in anything considered the "best ever" otherwise.

I'm pretty sure that Richmond will be forgotten after like 10 years because he has never been very popular nor has played in a not terriawful team in his prime. Shame

i watched the all-star celebrity game with a bunch of supposed die-hard laker fans, and none of them knew who mitch richmond was despite him winning a ring with the lakers. i bet if i asked them to name one team he played for, they wouldn't be able to do that either.

He did dominate that game far more than any towards the end of his career.

People talk about Richmond like he's one of the unrecognized greats (ala God Damn Dantley) or was some kind of superstar. He wasn't. He's more like Rip Hamilton, Ben Gordon or Michael Redd than anything resembling a superstar player. Or a "one-man army."

Starks v MJ ... best matchups EVER

blech.

Im not like Mitch's big fan or anything

Nah. I'd say it's pretty clear you're one of those blinded "the 90's were the best time of basketball ever!" fans. I don't see how John Starks could be involved in anything considered the "best ever" otherwise.

this comes from a guy who has never seen neither 90s NBA nor Kings game with Richmond

Another variant of the "watch the games!" argument. Nice.

Another variant of the "watch the games!" argument. Nice.

if he compares Mitch to Redd or Rip. what the fuck is he smoking? Mitch was the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th scoring option for Kings, was getting constantly double-teamed and so forth and hes calling him overhyped. LOL. he was one of few guys who could give every 2 guard in the league a nice beating.

i think the most adequate modern day comparison for mitch would be redd, without the injuries. he was a very consistent and reliable scorer, had a really awesome first three seasons with the warriors and did his thing for a few seasons until his neck rolls multiplied. he was the kings superstar, yeah, but the same could be said about redd with the bucks. he still didn't lead them to rings and neither has redd.

still, mitch was a really good shooter in his prime. just not as good as miller.

reggie will have his place in the hof soon. there's just a bunch of players/coaches waiting to get in.

btw, why hasn't tex winter been inducted yet? john bunn award is bs, just put him in already.

His continued exclusion from the Basketball Hall of Fame is indeed puzzling. He was inducted into the College Basketball Hall of Fame last year (the fifth class of inductions for that Hall) so even if one was to suggest that he was "only" a noteworthy assistant coach in the NBA, there's enough to his body of work as a head coach in college - not to mention his innovation of the triangle offense, utilised by eleven NBA championship teams to date - to merit induction, even if his resume lacks a lengthy and successful stint as a head coach in the pros.

Word has it that both Rodman and Winter are making the cut this year.

ARVYDAS SABONIS!!!

phpBB [video]

That three with glass in the end was sick

It's a shame he didn't make it to the NBA until age and injuries had pushed him a little past his prime. Love the "You've got to be kidding me!" then immediately switching gears to "Hey, it's cool" banter with the referees; not sure that'd fly if he were in the league today.