Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:11 pm
Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:31 pm
Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:43 pm
shadowgrin wrote:You do know the use of the word 'dynasty' in the context of sports, don't you?
Only two teams in your post can be labeled a 'dynasty' in the past decade and both of them are in the West.
Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:49 pm
Which team is REALLY better?
Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:40 pm
The one that wins the championship.
Thread ovah!
Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:35 pm
Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:42 pm
Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:17 pm
Triple J wrote:But what I admired about the Lakers were the team's ability to quickly get over roadblocks. I mean how hard is it for a team to get back to the NBA finals, after 3 years removed from one of its top contributors and superstars?
What I notice this season in the Spurs compared to their previous Championship teams is that the defense is nearly gone! The Spurs have become an offensive team and I really don't think that they would win because of this. For example when I heard about them giving up 128 points to the Knicks, I was just. How can a team win ball games when they give up to a good but not elite team in the Knicks? If they gave the points to the Lakers or Mavs, I wouldn't really care .. but the Knicks? Are you serious?
Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:04 pm
Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:11 pm
. How can a team win ball games when they give up to a good but not elite team in the Knicks? If they gave the points to the Lakers or Mavs, I wouldn't really care .. but the Knicks? Are you serious?
Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:37 pm
Sit wrote:1 game doesn't define a season.
The Spurs aren't going to give up 120+ points every night.
Sat Jan 08, 2011 9:00 am
Triple J wrote:The legacy of Dirk's team would always be remembered for getting their asses whooped by the Heat after leading by 2 games.
Sat Jan 08, 2011 10:30 am
Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:17 pm
The Spurs' defense are top 9 this season and they're 1st in offense (Def Rtg & Off Rtg).
The Knicks have offense now unlike the past seasons so it's not surprising that they are capable of doing it against a team like San Antonio.
As for defense...
1 game doesn't define a season.
The Spurs aren't going to give up 120+ points every night.
You really make me laugh , 1 game isn't the end of the world in this case
Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:47 pm
Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:03 pm
Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:01 pm
ZanShadow wrote:It was more of Dallas and Dirk choking as usual. I thought we've went over this 100 times now. Fucking idiot.
Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:11 pm
Triple J wrote: http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/ ... s-per-game
Here's the link to my source.
If Gregg Popovich said that the team has no defense .. well no use to agree with the legendary head coach
Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:27 am
Axel. wrote:ZanShadow wrote:It was more of Dallas and Dirk choking as usual. I thought we've went over this 100 times now. Fucking idiot.
So, did you get offended when I said "D-Wade cock-suckers"? Believe it or not, I was not referring to you. So don't go calling me a fucking idiot. And also, when people refer to the '06 Finals, it's more a subject of the bad officiating than Dallas choking. And to add to that, we haven't been over this 100 times, at least not with me anyways. Fucking idiot.
Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:20 pm
Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:15 pm
Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:07 am
Triple J wrote:Yes, 1 game does not define a season. But it could be the turning point of a whole season. Currently, the Spurs have 23 games that opponents scored over 100+ points. Back in the 06-07 season in which they won the championship, they allowed only 20 games , in which opponents scored over 100+ points. Yes, the numbers doesn't seem big, but if you actually look at the schedules. You will notice that the Spurs haven't won an NBA championship when they have more than 20 games (at this point of the season) in which they allowed 100+ points. Back in the 04-05 season .. they only had 2 games (at this point of the season) where opponents scored 100+ points.