Richard Hamilton
Sat Feb 07, 2004 11:01 am
Wat r ur opinions? Should he have been an All-star...I thionk he should have in front of Michael Redd
Sat Feb 07, 2004 11:23 am
no way man,
Michael Redd deserves it more, redd is the one of the best rebounding guards in the league, and a hell of a scorer to boot
Michael Redd deserves it more, redd is the one of the best rebounding guards in the league, and a hell of a scorer to boot
Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:54 pm
They are very similar... Redd is more of a 3 pt bomber while Rip has one of the best midrange games... I'd say Redd was more deserving... Rip will be an All-Star someday, too. Too bad his team wins more and he has better players to play with...
Sat Feb 07, 2004 4:16 pm
Rip's game is boring. Unlike Redd who's game has a mix of inside and outside plus he's good in clutch situations.. 
Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:26 pm
Redd is a decent slasher.. very good from outside, a better scorer
Rip has a better midrange game tho.. he is one of the best at the 12-20 footers, he is more of a shooter
Redd = scorer, Rip = shooter
scorer > shooter
Redd is main man for Bucks, Rip's got Billups to take the clutch ones, and Ben is most popular player on the team..
therefore Redd = All-Star
Rip has a better midrange game tho.. he is one of the best at the 12-20 footers, he is more of a shooter
Redd = scorer, Rip = shooter
scorer > shooter
Redd is main man for Bucks, Rip's got Billups to take the clutch ones, and Ben is most popular player on the team..
therefore Redd = All-Star
Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:37 pm
as much as i like RIP, Redd should be/is higher on the All Star list than RIP